Earticle

This study conducted a precise recension and comparative analysis of 82 texts across 18 letter groups compiled in Jujadaejeon(A), Jujaseojeolyo(B), and Eojeongjuseobaekseon(C) Volume 4. The bibliographic and technical characteristics derived from the research are as follows: In titling System, While A maintains the original prototype sequence of ‘Epistolary Form–Topic–Title–(Annotation)’, B simplifies this into ‘Topic–Title–(Annotation),’ and C drastically reduces it to either ‘Title Only’ or ‘Title–Annotation’. In textual Compilation and Editing, Both B and C omitted ceremonial greetings and peripheral descriptions found in A, selectively compiling core academic and philosophical discourses. Notably, in the section ‘Dabyugjajeong’, a flexible editing method was identified, where a postscript selected from a different letter was appended. In annotation Placement, To enhance readability, A and C adopted the headnote (頭註) system at the top of the main text, whereas B employed the endnote (尾註) system at the close of the text, demonstrating a clear structural divergence. In philological Variants (異文), The textual variations between the editions primarily consisted of the usage of variant characters (同字), orthodox/vulgar/ancient forms (本字․俗字․古字), and synonymous terms. Additionally, specific instances of distinct words (相異語) that induce semantic changes during textual transmission, as well as contextual emendations, were identified. The findings of this study will serve as foundational baseline data for research in bibliography, Confucianism, and Sino-Korean literature to clarify the Choson-style adaptation and transmission lineage of Neo-Confucian texts.

본고에서는 조선 후기 해주오씨 정무공파 종가와 부마 오태주의 후손가(명안공주방)에 전해진 고문헌의 사례를 통해 과거 어느 시점을 지나면서 원소장처를 벗어나 흩어져 존재하는 고문헌의 실태를 구체적으로 살펴보고, 이를 토대로 학계와 고문헌 소장처에서 이러한 고문헌에 대한 출처를 기술하고자 하는 노력을 기울일 필요성을 제기하고 방안을 제안해 보았다. 현재 여러 고문헌 소장기관을 통해 확인되는 고문헌 가운데는 원소장처를 벗어난 이후 뿔뿔이 흩어져 고문헌의 표면적인 특징 위주로만 정보가 추출되고 의미가 부여되는 경우가 많다. 이런 고문헌에 대해 정리자나 연구자가 좀 더 노력을 기울여서 원소장처에 대한 근거를 확인하여 그 정보를 기술해 줄 수 있다면, 해당 고문헌에 대한 심층적인 이해와 연구가 이루어질 수 있고, 나아가 과거 어느 시점을 기준으로 한 원소장처의 규모와 면모를 복원하는 시도도 가능하다.

This paper specifically examines the current state of ancient archives that have been scattered after leaving their original storage locations at some point in the past, through the case of ancient archives passed down within the main branch of the Haeju Oh clan’s Jeongmugong branch and the descendants of Oh Tae-ju, a royal son-in-law (Myeongan Princess’s household), during the late Joseon Dynasty. Based on this, the paper raises the necessity for researchers and institutions holding these materials to make efforts to describe their sources and proposes a method for doing so. Among the ancient archives currently identified through various repositories, there are many cases where information is extracted and meaning is attributed based primarily on the superficial characteristics of the materials, as they have been scattered after leaving their original repositories. If compilers or researchers were to make greater efforts to verify the evidence regarding the original repositories and describe the information, a deeper understanding and research of the ancient archives could be achieved, and furthermore, it would be possible to attempt to reconstruct the scale and appearance of the original repositories based on a specific point in the past.

This study comprehensively examines the extant editions of Daejeon Hwasang Joo Simgyeong (｢大顚和尙注心經｣), organizing their bibliographic characteristics and textual lineages. It also establishes the relationship between the Goryeo edition and the Munsusa edition through a comparative analysis of their printed texts. In particular, the study newly reveals that the copy held by the Cheongju Early Printing Museum contains printing pages from both the 1360 edition and the 1411 Munsusa edition. Previously, only indirect evidence was available to suggest that the 1360 Goryeo edition, which predates the Munsusa edition, was produced in Korea. However, comparison with the copy held by the Cheongju Early Printing Museum provides conclusive evidence that it was a Korean edition and further confirms the strong possibility that it was the Munsusa edition.

This study aims to examine the interrelationship between the bibliographic recording and transmission of Ming Dynasty leishu (類書). To this end, it analyzes the continuity of records concerning Ming Dynasty leishu in Huang Yuji’s privately compiled catalog, Qianqingtang Shumu (󰡔千頃堂書目󰡕), and the officially compiled catalogs, the Mingshi Yiwenzhi (󰡔明史󰡕 ｢藝文志｣) and the Siku Quanshu Zongmu (󰡔四庫全書總目󰡕), while also examining the extant status of these works in Korea and China. During the 277-year period of the Ming dynasty (1368-1644), 125 Ming-dynasty leishu were recorded in the early Qing bibliographic work Qianqingtang Shumu. Subsequently, of the 78 leishu recorded in the Mingshi Yiwenzhi, 77 were found to have been derived from Qianqingtang Shumu, while 32 were subsequently recorded in Siku Quanshu Zongmu, demonstrating the continuity of their bibliographic records. An analysis of the characteristics of the Ming-dynasty leishu recorded in these three catalogs shows that works concerning texts and historical anecdotes, literature and verse, and comprehensive encyclopedic knowledge constitute the largest categories across all three catalogs. A comparative analysis of the bibliographic records of the leishu included in bibliographical catalogs of the Ming dynasty revealed differences in the recording of the number of juan (卷), authors’ names, titles, and other bibliographic information, as well as cases in which existing records were corrected or supplemented. A comparative analysis of the descriptive entries for the Yongle Dadian (永樂大典) further showed distinct characteristics among the major bibliographical sources. The Qianqingtang Shumu focused primarily on the circumstances surrounding the compilation and the organizational structure of the work. The Mingshi Yiwenzhi, as an official bibliographical catalog, presented the work relatively briefly for registration purposes. In contrast, the Siku Quanshu Zongmu provided bibliographic textual verification and critical evaluation, while also offering a positive assessment of the work from the perspective of the preservation and transmission of textual materials. Furthermore, an investigation into the survival status of the Ming-dynasty leishu listed and not listed in the Siku Quanshu Zongmu found that, of the 32 works included in the catalog, 28 are extant and 4 are presumed lost. Among the 46 works not included in the catalog, 17 are extant and 29 are presumed lost. Thus, the survival rate of the works included in the Siku Quanshu Zongmu was 87.5%, whereas that of the works not included was approximately 37.0%. This substantial difference in survival rates suggests the significance of bibliographical inclusion in examining the transmission and preservation of Ming-dynasty leishu. These findings also demonstrate that the Siku Quanshu Zongmu can serve not merely as a bibliographical catalog but also as an important bibliographic resource for identifying the bibliographic characteristics and textual value of Ming-dynasty leishu, including works that are no longer extant, and for tracing patterns of their transmission. In conclusion, this study reexamined the value and significance of traditional bibliographic catalogs and their role as a form of mass media in transmitting knowledge to the modern era by analyzing the continuity of the cataloging and transmission of Ming-dynasty leishu from the Qianqingtang Shumu through the Mingshi Yiwenzhi to the Siku Quanshu Zongmu.

국보․보물 기록유산에 대한 실물 접근이 어려운 현실에서 시공간의 제약을 벗어나 활용성을 극대화할 수 있는 전략이 온라인 정보서비스이다. 기록유산을 온전히 이해하기 위해서는 맥락 정보와 지정 가치, 기록유산 자체에 대한 정보가 충분히 전달되어야 한다. 본 연구는 국보․보물 기록유산이 갖는 국가적․역사적 중요성을 인식하고 기록유산에 대한 풍부한 정보를 체계적으로 제공하기 위한 방법을 모색하고자 하였다. 보물로 지정된 ｢박지원 열하일기 초고본 일괄｣의 지정 과정을 추적하여 지정 과정 중에 생산된 활용성이 높은 기록을 조사했으며, 이 기록을 정리하여 제공하는 방법으로 국보, 보물 컬렉션 단위의 조직과 시리즈 단위의 기술을 제안하였다. 국보․보물 기록유산에 대한 단편적 정보 전달에서 벗어나 내용, 구조, 맥락에 대한 풍부한 정보를 제공했을 때 기록유산의 가치와 내용을 제대로 이해하고 활용할 수 있다.

An online information service is a strategy that can maximize the usability of document heritage designated as national treasures or treasures. To fully understand these document heritage, there needs to be enough information on their context, designation value, and the records themselves. This study aimed to find ways to systematically provide rich information about?document heritage while recognizing the national and historical importance of those designated as national treasures or treasures. By tracking the designation process of the treasure ?Park Ji-won’s Yeolha Ilgi Draft Manuscripts Collection?, the study examined highly usable records produced during the designation process, and proposed a way to organize and provide this information through collection-level organization or series-level description. By moving away from delivering fragmented information about document heritage designated as national treasures or treasures and offering rich details on content, structure, and context, people can better understand and use the value and content of these heritage records.

이 연구는 1910년대부터 1940년대까지 일본 유학생 朱泰道와 재조일본인이 같은 표제로 발행한 ｢실업지조선｣ 잡지의 서지사항을 발행 주체와 관련하여 소개하였다. 이 과정에서 이들 잡지의 서지사항에 관한 기존의 오류를 바로잡았다. ｢실업지조선｣의 발행 주체들이 일본의 ｢실업지일본｣ 잡지의 기획을 모방했음을 밝혔다. ｢실업지일본｣은 실업성공가전을 통해 성공을 조장하였고, ‘자조론’을 20세기 자본주의 정신으로 새롭게 유포하였다. ｢실업지조선｣(경성․동경)의 발행인 崔永澤은 ‘자조론’을 수용한 지식인이었고, 편집인 주태도는 ｢자조론｣을 실업 정신으로 소개하는 한편 실업가 경험담 란을 설치하였다. ｢실업지일본｣은 실업가가 갖출 정신으로 ‘修養’을 강조하였는데, ｢실업지조선｣(군산)의 발행인 牛尾正一은 ｢수양｣란을 설치하였다. 두 개의 ｢실업지조선｣이 ｢실업지일본｣의 기획을 모방한 단서를 제시한 이 연구는 이 논의를 진전할 토대를 마련했다는 점에서 의의가 있다.

This study examined the bibliography of the magazine Business of Choseon, which was published under the same title by Ju Tae-Do who studied in Japan and by Japanese in Korea, 1910s-1940s. During the review process, I corrected existing errors regarding the bibliographic details of these two journals. It was revealed that the publishers of the two Business of Choseon publications mimicked the concept of the Japanese magazine Business of Japan. The magazine Business of Japan encouraged success in the business world through biographies of successful entrepreneurs and reintroduced the concept of self-help to Japanese society as a spirit of 20th-century capitalism. Choi Young-Taek, the publisher of Business of Choseon (Gyeongseong/Tokyo) was an intellectual who embraced self-help, while editor Ju Tae-Do included an article introducing Self-Help as a spirit of business. In addition, Ju Tae-Do established a regular column featuring the experiences of Korean Businessmen. The concept of self-cultivation emphasized in the Business of Japan as a mindset and attitude essential for business people. Shoichi Ushio, the publisher of Business of Choseon(Gunsan), established a self-cultivation column. The two publications titled the Business of Choseon mimicked this concept from the Business of Japan. In short, this study is significant in that it has laid the foundation for further research on this subject.

이 연구는 강희맹(1424-1483)이 저술한 ｢금양잡록｣의 현전본을 조사하고 판본별 서지적 특징을 비교․분석하여 전래 양상을 밝히는 데 목적이 있다. 조사 결과 ｢금양잡록｣은 성종 23년(1492)경 초기 판본 계열에서 시작하여 선조 14년(1581) ｢농사직설｣과의 합간, 효종 6년(1655) ｢농가집성｣ 편입, 순조 5년(1805) ｢사숙재집｣ 수록이라는 세 가지 경로로 전래되었음을 확인하였다. 이 과정에서 목판본을 중심으로 후쇄․번각․방각본 간행을 통해 오랜 기간 보급되었으며, 금속활자와 목활자로도 인출되었다. 이는 사찬 농서가 관찬 농서와 합간되고 종합 농서와 문집에 수록되어 조선 후기까지 전해진 양상을 현전본을 통해 실증적으로 밝힌 데 의의가 있다.

This study examines extant copies of Geumyangjaprok, written by Kang Hui-maeng (1424-1483), to identify their bibliographical characteristics and trace the work’s transmission. The findings show that, following an early edition dating to around 1492, the work was transmitted in three forms: a combined edition with Nongsajikseol in 1581, inclusion in Nonggajipseong in 1655, and inclusion in Sasukjaejip in 1805. It circulated for an extended period through later impressions, recarved woodblocks, and commercially printed editions; it was also printed using metal and wooden movable type. By examining extant copies, this study demonstrates how a privately compiled agricultural treatise continued to be transmitted into the late Joseon period through its combination with an officially compiled agricultural treatise and its inclusion in a comprehensive agricultural work and the author’s collected writings.