Earticle

현재 위치 Home

동북아 문화연구 [Journal of North-east Asian Cultures]

간행물 정보
  • 자료유형
    학술지
  • 발행기관
    동북아시아문화학회 [The Association of North-east Asian Cultures]
  • pISSN
    1598-3692
  • 간기
    계간
  • 수록기간
    2001 ~ 2026
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 주제분류
    복합학 > 학제간연구
  • 십진분류
    KDC 910 DDC 950
제23집 (31건)
No
31

선박충돌사고와 형사과실책임

임석원

동북아시아문화학회 동북아 문화연구 제23집 2010.06 pp.589-601

※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

The number of traffic accidents at sea are few in comparison with traffic accidents on the road. However, there is no saying that traffic accidents at sea are few when we compare cars which are driven quickly on a narrow road with ships which make slow voyages over wide seas. It is possible for us to prevent ship accidents at sea if we take adequate notice of the radar, the gong , and the wireless installation of the ship. Nevertheless, the causes of ship accidents at sea are, firstly, making a voyage without enough attention, and, secondly, unskillfulness in the control of the ship. Taking this opportunity of this problems, went deep into the study of development and examination about a criminal liability in a ship accident of theories and cases in Japan. The question of whether or not to admit a criminal liability, is determined by the existence of the possibility of concrete foresight. It is impossible to shirk one's criminal responsibility about an illegal act, if the possibility of concrete foresight exists, and if we do not take complementary measures for evasion of a result, and if ship accidents at sea give rise to a violation of the benefit and protection of the law. If it is so, we must not only search for a standard regarding the possibility of concrete foresight, but also judge by the standard under a special feature of the ship which makes a voyage. This paper shows how we will decide a standard of criminal liability in a ship accident. Firstly, the existence of the relation of cause and effect is most important in the standard. Secondly, navigation from the maritime traffic law is also important. Thirdly, the existence of justification of circumstantial judgment from "The Daily Routine Work Act of seamen" is an important standard.

 
1 2
페이지 저장