Earticle

Home

산업재산권 [Journal of Industrial Property]

간행물 정보
  • 자료유형
    학술지
  • 발행기관
    한국지식재산학회 [Korea Intellectual Property Society]
  • ISSN
    1598-6055
  • 간기
    연3회
  • 수록기간
    1995~2019
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 주제분류
    사회과학 > 법학
  • 십진분류
    KDC 360 DDC 340
제21호 (9건)
No
1

유전자원 관련 전통지식의 보호와 지적재산

김병일, 김경준, 채지영

한국지식재산학회 산업재산권 제21호 2006.12 pp.1-34

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

The traditional knowledge("TK") and practices of indigenous and local communities that are developed and passed on through traditional culture are closely linked to the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. But there is no protection for the traditional knowledge obtained by indigenous or local communities, usually from developing countries, through collective processes that may have taken even centuries. Advocates for conventional intellectual property systems argue that intellectual property rights create effective incentives for innovative use of biodiversity, which in turn creates profits on which innovators can draw in negotiating benefit-sharing arrangements with the holders of traditional knowledge and biodiversity. Nowadays, the implications of conventional intellectual property systems for traditional knowledge and biodiversity have been the subject of a polarized international debate. Traditional knowledge includes a vast and complex amount of manifestations. This article, nonetheless, will deal exclusively with TK related to genetic resources. Its protection from the perspective of the framework of multilateral treaties, the possible protection through existing intellectual property rights and the search for an alternative solution. This article has sought to suggest how Intellectual Property system could be a tool to protect traditional knowledge.

7,600원

2

특허무효사유와 특허권 남용

유대종

한국지식재산학회 산업재산권 제21호 2006.12 pp.35-61

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

All subjective rights fulfill a social function and these rights should therefore be exercised in compliance with their function. A social finality is attached to all rights, including the most selfish rights of all. Such rights are granted to individuals not merely for benefit of their own self-interest, but even more so for that of the community as whole. Patent right granted to inventions having intellectual applicability, novelty and nonobviousness. If Patent right has been granted contrary to requirements for patent, this right must null a trial to invalidate a patent. Patent Act adopts to authority distribution in invalidarion of patent and construction of patent. Hence, the court make not judge that patent has been granted contrary to novelty and nonobviousness. But, Court has been judged patent with not novelty and has not been judged patent with obviousness. Patent Act aims to encourage, protect and utilize inventions, thereby improving and developing technology, and to contribute to the development of industry. In accordance with, the court with an action relating to the infringement of a patent right, if unquestioned a patent invalidation, puts limitation on exercise patentee rights prior to the decision on a patent opposition relevant to the trial or the trial decision.

6,600원

3

도면간소화 방안 연구

배상철

한국지식재산학회 산업재산권 제21호 2006.12 pp.103-146

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

In present Design Law, the applicant should submitt six views and perspective view to KIPO when a design of three-dimensional product is filed. It has recognized that Request of many views is a burden to the applicant. In Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement, no contracting party may requires more than six views where the product is three-dimensional. And the foreign countries have entrust the applicant with a drawing sumbission matter. Therefore, the simplification to submission of a design-drawing is desirble, considering national harmonization, conveniece of the applicant and etc., From this point of view, a study wii1l review a enactment of foreign countries and International Aggrement. Then, offer an alternative plan on the simplification to submission of the design-drawing.

9,100원

4

현행 저작권법상 저작인격권의 법리에 관한 검토

배대헌

한국지식재산학회 산업재산권 제21호 2006.12 pp.147-191

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

The doctrine of moral right reflects the idea that author has spiritual(or personal) interests from his or her copyright work. An author may concern that his work should be recognized as his, and attributed to him by his name, then he wants to protect his works against harmful attributions or distortion. All of these personal interests are protected as 'droit moral'(moral right) in copyright laws. And the development of digital technology for the creation and reproduction of works opens a new copyright world which to present new creative possibilities as well as difficulties for authors. This article argues that the moral rights would be protected to keep authors' spiritual and economic interests altogether, and to hand down historical heritage for next generations, as well. This article is made up with five parts; Part I of this article introduces the legal definition, the historical development of moral right and the problem statement, Part Ⅱ discusses the legal theories of moral right in copyright laws. Part Ⅲ argues three mortal rights which stipulates in the Copyright Law of Korea; right of disclosure, right of attribution and right of integrity, Part Ⅳ examines that wether moral rights would be strengthened or be become weak, as it were. Lastly, this article concludes that moral rights can serve an important social function in emerging information economy, and can expand authors into continuing controls.

9,300원

5

‘기술적 보호조치’(TPM)와 ‘상호운용성’(Interoperability) : 최근 프랑스에서 행해진 Apple사의 FairPlay(iPod 전용DRM)에 관한 공정거래위원회의 결정과 지적재산권법 개정안에 관한 헌법위원회의 위헌성 결정을 중심으로

남궁술, 신재호

한국지식재산학회 산업재산권 제21호 2006.12 pp.227-254

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

Aujourd'hui, le probleme pour l'harmonisation entre la protection du droit d'auteur et le respect du droit d'usager de l'information est un theme essentiel dans Ie domaine du droit de la propriete intelleetuelle. Ce probleme s'est lie particulierernent aux partiques exclusives du TPM(Technicai Protection Measures), c'est-a-dire que comment peut-on resoudre de f~on harmonieuse Ie probleme de conflit entre la pratique exclusive du TPM et Ie droit d'usager de l'information. A propos de ce probleme, il y a deux decisions essentielles juridiques en France. L'une d'elles concerne la decision du Conseil de la concurrence sur la pratique fermee du FairPlay(DRM exclusive pour iPod) d'Apple. D'apres cette decision, 『 Meme si Apple Computer France peut se situer a une position dominante dans certains marches de la musique numerique, la pratique fermee du FairPlay ne constitue pas les conditions de l'abus de position dominanre.』 L'autre concerne la decion du Conseil constitutionnel sur le projet pour la reforme du Code de la propriete intellectuelle(la loi du 30 juin 2006). D'apres cette decision, 『Meme si la limitation legislative de la pratique exclusive du TPM pour l'interoperabilire n'esr pas contraire a la Constitution francaise, il est incosntitutionnel d'exclure la responsabilite en l'absence de la definition de l'interoperabilite des actes qui portent atteintes au TPM.』 Apres cette decision du Conseil constitutionnel, il est juridiquement confirrne en France de limiter la pratique ferrnee du DRM, c'est-a-dire TPM, mais uniquement par la decision de l'Autorite de regulation des mesures techniques. Cette legislation est un premier pas pour l'harmonisation entre la protection du droit d'auteur et le respect du droit d'usager de l'information. Mais il nous reste encore un probleme fondamental sur la propriete intellectuelle. Est-ce qu'il faut maintenir le concept traditionnel selon lequel la propriere intellectuelle est un droit exclusive sans consideration des particularites de celle-ci ?

6,700원

6

지주회사제도를 통한 산학협력단 보유기술 활용방안

김선정, 이동원

한국지식재산학회 산업재산권 제21호 2006.12 pp.255-289

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

Recently, almost all the universities stress the need of entrepreneurship and technology transfer including design and intellectual property, and the main paradigm of university on service invention is changed rapidly all over the world. In Korea, the application and utilization of the technology of university are also getting the main point of the operation of the university by degrees, and the technology licensing organization is founded in various forms to utilize that technology more effectively in the fields of IT, BT, and NT. But the existing TLOs of universities have difficulties in utilization, and are facing various limitations including the legal and philosophical ones; first, the foundation of the technological company is prohibited on account of the nature of the non-profit corporation of TLO and second, it is hard to found the technological company on account of the academic character of universities. The more efficient way to attain the goal to commercialize the technology is by way of the utilization of technology holding company such as that of Tsinghua University, Royal Institute of Technology, and Karolinska Institutet. The technology holding company can give the university the useful value to maximize the utilization of the technologies, and this article will show the desirable ways to use that company.

7,800원

7

산업기술 유출규제에 관한 법적 고찰 : 부정경쟁방지 및 영업 비밀보호에 관한 법률과 산업기술유출방지 및 보호에 관한 법률을 중심으로

조용순, 홍영서

한국지식재산학회 산업재산권 제21호 2006.12 pp.291-315

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

The importance of industrial technology is enormously growing in the age of limitless competition. Because the superiority of advanced science technology is directly linked to national power. So many countries around the world not only dashed into the research and development of industrial technology but also enacted laws and regulation to protect themselves from losing advanced science technology. Korea have developed very rapidly in the field of technology, especially in IT technology. This means that Korean companies are now no exception of the global economic espionage. So, it is necessary for the Korean government to revise the relevant laws and regulation for the effective enforcement on the industrial spies. In Korea, the legal Regulation of industrial technology outflow has been prescribed with the revision of the Unfair Competition Protection Law on Dec. 31. 1991, and has become effective since Dec.15.1992 to cope with the foreign trade pressure from the WTO/TRIPs negotiations. Nevertheless the revised Act does not provide enough criminal protection against economic espionage. so, Unfair Competition Protection Law was revised in 1998, 2004. And Industrial technology outflow Prevention and Protection Law(the Technology Outflow Prevention Law) was be established in September.2006. So, This study intent to explain the Legal Regulation of industrial technology outflow, especially Unfair Competition prevention and Business Secret Protection Law and Industrial technology outflow Prevention and Protection Law and reviews legal confliction of two major laws and suggests methods to solve the confliction fundamentally.

6,300원

발표논문

8

Strategies in using the Madrid, CTM and national trademark registration systems : Including some licensing aspects(Procedures, Advantages, Disadvantages and options from the perspective of a Korean applicant)

Michael Best

한국지식재산학회 산업재산권 제21호 2006.12 pp.317-342

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

세계 각국에 상표를 출원 및 등록하는 방법에는 각 국가별 출원, 마드리드 시스템에 의한 출원, 유럽공동체 상표출원 등의 방법이 있다. 각 국가별 출원이란 출원하고자 하는 해외의 각 국가별로 해당국의 전문가에게 출원을 의뢰하는 방법으로서,출원인은 각 국가의 전문가들과 연락하여 절차를 진행하여야 한다. 마드리드 시스템(마드리드 협정과 마드리드 프로토콜을 포함)이란,국제 출원시스템에 대한 저렴하고 간면 한 방안의 모색에 의하여 탄생된 시스템으로서, 하나의 국제등록 절차에 의하여 각 국가별로 권리의 확장이 가능한 방법이다. 유럽공동체상표는 유럽공동체 국가 전역에 대한 저렴하고 간편한 출원 및 권리보호를 위하여 고안된 시스템 으로서, 현재 27개국의 가입국으로 구성되어 있다. 유럽공동체 국가 전역에 대하여 하나의 등록만이 존재하며, 가입국가별로 권리의 확장이 가능하다. 본 논문에서는 각 시스템에 있어서의 상표조사 방법, 출원절차, 비용, 이의신청 절차, 등록절차, 대응방법, 라 이센싱 등의 단계별 절차에 대하여 알아보고, 장단점을 비교한 후, 대한민국 출원인의 관점에서 조망한 각 시 스템의 전략적 운영방안에 대하여 살펴보았다.

6,400원

9

The Most Efficient Strategies for International Trademark Searching

Brigitta Best

한국지식재산학회 산업재산권 제21호 2006.12 pp.343-354

※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.

“국제상표검색(조새)”이라는 용어에 있어서, “국제”의 의미란 200여개 이상의 세계 모는 국가를 의미할 수도 있고, 50여개국의 주요 국가를 의미할 수도 있으며. 3개국 정도의 해외국가를 의미할 수도 있는 등 실로 다양하다. 따라 서, 효율적 국제상표검색에 있어서 수행해야 할 작업은 “국제”라는 용어의 다양성만큼이나 다양하다. 상표검색은 정보 수집의 준비단계에서 시작하여, 분석 및 검토 작업으로 마무리 되는데, 효율적 국제상표검색을 위 해서는 관련자 및 검색의 용도, 조사 대상국가 및 상품, 서비스업의 범위, 예산 등에 대한 정보가 펼요하다. 또한, 상표검색은 상표의 각 단계별로 수행될 수 있는데, 상표가 어느 단계에 있는지에 대한 정보는 검색수행에 있어서 매우 중요하다. 본 논문에서는 효율적 국제상표검색을 위하여 알아두어야 할 사항에 대하여 구체적으로 살펴보고, 후미에 이와 같 은 기준에 입각한 실제 검색사 례를 소개하였다.

4,300원

 
페이지 저장