All subjective rights fulfill a social function and these rights should therefore be exercised in compliance with their function. A social finality is attached to all rights, including the most selfish rights of all. Such rights are granted to individuals not merely for benefit of their own self-interest, but even more so for that of the community as whole. Patent right granted to inventions having intellectual applicability, novelty and nonobviousness. If Patent right has been granted contrary to requirements for patent, this right must null a trial to invalidate a patent. Patent Act adopts to authority distribution in invalidarion of patent and construction of patent. Hence, the court make not judge that patent has been granted contrary to novelty and nonobviousness. But, Court has been judged patent with not novelty and has not been judged patent with obviousness. Patent Act aims to encourage, protect and utilize inventions, thereby improving and developing technology, and to contribute to the development of industry. In accordance with, the court with an action relating to the infringement of a patent right, if unquestioned a patent invalidation, puts limitation on exercise patentee rights prior to the decision on a patent opposition relevant to the trial or the trial decision.
목차
I. 서론 II. 특허 무효사유와 그 판단 1. 신규성이 결여된 특허 2. 진보성이 결여된 특허 III. 특허권 남용의 성렵요건과 유형 1. 특허권 남용의 성립요건 : Kilby판결을 중심으로 2. 특허권 남용의 유형 IV. 당연무효의 인정 여부 V . 결론 참고문헌 Abstract
키워드
특허무효항변특허권 남용권리남용당연무효특허무효사유patent misusedefence of patent invalidationinvalidation of patentper se invalidationper se illegal
본 학회는 지식재산 및 관련 제도(특허, 실용신안, 상표, 디자인, 영업비밀, 저작권, 반도체칩, 컴퓨터프로그램, 데이터베이스, 디지털콘텐츠 등)에 관한 국내외 이론과 실무에 대한 연구를 촉진하여 지식재산분야의 학문간 융합발전과 국제적 유대를 강화하고, 지식재산에 관한 지식을 보급하여 인적 네트워크 구축과 정책제언을 추진하며 이를 통해 국가발전에 이바지하는 것을 목적으로 한다.