Earticle

The purpose of this study is to research the procedure of terminological interpretation. The foreign term, 'physical education' was initially introduced to Korea and was translated as 'cheyang'. The bibliographical method was done for this research by analyzing 　The Royal Rescript on Education　 which was announced by King Kojong in 1895. The noun, 'cheyang' is a new language that is created by unifying 'che' meaning body in Chinese and 'yang' derived from 'yangsheng' which means 'nourishing vitality' in Chinese. The predicate, 'cheyang' was designed by Kabo reformers who governed contemporary politics. The Kabo reformers were constituted by the committee members, Yu Kil Jun (1856-1914, a university student in the US at that time), Park Junyang, Kim Hongjip others, who inspected Japanese institutions in a variety of areas as members of envoy of a goodwill mission. The Japanese term meaning physical education was fixed since the Institute of Physical Exercise and Instruction was established in October, 1878. An idea spread among the Public of Korea that they should avoid using the Japanese term and instead follow their traditional and philosophical principle called yangsheng. The Korean people created and used 'cheyang' in particular, although they had used the term 'physical education' earlier. The Kabo reformers insisted on national autonomy while still imitating Japanese politics and their military system as intervention in domestic affairs of Japan was getting increasing. They felt this would confirm an independent position of national autonomy and free them from the control of the Chung dynasty. Therefore,. cheyang' is the term used to also show the emotion of the Korean people.

In this research is clarified the contents of a tactics military art in the cultural structure of Korean, China and Japan after the 16th century. It is through a document analysis and comparison of whole one approach method of a study of sports anthropology. I think the movement technology of ≪Heiho-hidensho≫,≪Bujutsu-hayamanabi≫ and≪Muye-dobo-tongji≫ will be compared and examined focusing on 'Nian-zhou-shi' for this research ≪Jixiao-xinshu≫ 'The Art of Fist', and considers military art culture common in Korea, China and Japan through such contents. ≪ Jixiao-xinshu≫, it was possible to compare ≪Heiho-hidensho≫,≪Bujutsu-hayamanabi≫ and ≪Muye-dobo-tongji≫, and copies of military art of Korea, China and Japan through consideration focusing on `Nian-zhou-shi''. ≪Jixiao-xinshu≫ at China in spite of a Chinese book on tactics, and it was also exerted on Korea and Japan. It's possible to confirm ≪Muye-dobo-tongji≫ by which compilation was issued at Korea and Japan. ≪Heiho-hidensho≫ and≪Bujutsu-hayamanabi≫, the contents common to ≪Jixiao-xinshu≫ and the typical example is `Nian-zhou-shi' of the movement the 'The Art of Fist' of Representatives is. After movement technology was compared and examined 3 books of `Description' and 'Explanation' focusing on `Nian-zhou-shi' of ≪Jixiao-xinshu≫. The `Description' of movement was similar, but a movement name was different from the `Explanation'. Such 4 books were doing the movement explanation separately to the same movement. But it was possible to see the part of the military art culture in at that time through a common point of a described setting example movement of `Nian-zhou-shi''.

There has been an increase in the festivals for historical figures in Korea today. This study was aimed to investigate the 'Cultural Festival of General Nam I-Heung' in terms of its establishment and development focusing on archery. In order to solve the questions, the study conducted a survey for literary documents and Field work and its results were as below. First, it seemed that 'General Yisunshin Festival' held by the state gave a direct opportunity to the opening of the said festival. Second, in its initial stage, there were some conflicts with local residents, but the dedicated efforts of the Family Nam and the support of administrative authorities in the region enabled them to have a larger scale. Third, as years go by, new items were added in the festival and were mainly related to martial arts. Fourth, unlike other martial arts, archery served as a cultural focus resisting strong acculturation experienced in socio-cultural aspects, and its symbolic capital has become a driving force that has endorsed spiritual culture. As shown above, the festivals have changed a lot in the methods of operation while maintaining their original quality with regards to value.

This study focused on the freedom of department choice and right of learning between these system and student-athlete that contribute good life for student-athlete in the future. In this study, I criticize the unlawfulness admission examination for a sport talent at present. The groundless of critic logic have six reasons. first, A student-athlete have not right to choice freely departments at University. Second, It is losing right that a student-athlete learn freely for himself. Third, There are a problems that physical education departments have no choice but admit a student-athlete no studying talent. Forth, University give student-athlete to diploma without completion of a school course. Fifth, A student-athlete have not participate in class for graduation. Sixth, University have not control speciality class for student-athlete. In conclusion, We should solve the problems step by step by harmonizing choice and right, University and student-athlete for respect human and good life. This study was to criticizes the unlawfulness admission examination for a sport talent from the perspectives of human respect.