Earticle

The purpose of this paper is to show how English overlapping reference is acquired by Korean learners of English. First, we have provided an answer to the question of whether or not Korean learners of English lend support to the zero transfer position that learners have complete access to Universal Grammar. Korean learners in the study do entertain the hypothesis that learners look for similarities whenever they can find them but do not respect the zero transfer position. Second, the results of our experiment clearly indicate that Binding Condition B may be part of the innate endowment that Korean learners of English bring to the acquisition task. Third, we have argued in this paper that Korean learners do not predict the TSC effect in the acquisition of English overlapping reference. Fourth, we have argued that L2 learners will acquire pronominal binding first, which appears within the NP, then pronominal binding, which appears within the minimal S. Finally, we have contended that in the case of pronominal binding, the acquisition of overlapping reference in L2 English is affected by Principle B.

Our purpose here has been to address the use and frequencies of universally attested local anaphors and long-distance anaphors within the corpus approach. First, both Seycong corpus and novel corpus clearly illustrate the fact that the Korean reflexive casin ‘self’ can be used more frequently and that it is one of the primary exponents of Korean reflexives with caki ‘self’. We have argued in this paper that this finding, of course, accords well with our claim that casin ‘self’ appears anywhere other reflexives appear, but other reflexives are barred from certain positions where casin ‘self’ can appear. There might be plenty of reasons why the Korean reflexive casin ‘self’ is the most preferred reflexive among Korean reflexives. The biggest reason of all may be because it admits both local binding and non-local binding. In addition, the phi-features of casin ‘self’ are defective in that they are not specified. Thus, casin ‘self’ can get its reference from the first person, the second person, and the third person. Second, we have observed earlier that possessive case-marked reflexives in Korean are preferable to other case-marked reflexives and that a reflexive is most likely to be bound by an NP in a sentence if that reflexive can be interpreted as a possessive cased-marked reflexive. Although it is not clear how this can be accounted for, there may be much relevance between reflexives and their case markers. Third, we have pointed out that the overall frequency of caki-casin ‘self-self’ is lower than that of caki ‘self’. We assume that this result is expected, given the assumption that only caki ‘self’ among Korean reflexives can refer to the hearer as its referent. That is, this can be reduced to the availability of the hearer’s accessibility to caki ‘self’. Finally, we have demonstrated that Condition A in Korean does not constrain the distribution of anaphors which are supposed to be local and that anaphors in Korean freely overlap in local domain or non-local domain. Consequently, our corpus analysis does not argue for the hypothesis that reflexives and pronouns must be in complementary distribution.

The main purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of the acquisition of split antecedence in L2 English by Korean learners. First, we have argued against the pronominal anaphor analysis. Second, we have maintained that the ability to take split antecedents in Korean unlike English may be viewed as a property of the plural morpheme tul, rather than that of the reflexive itself and that the permitted pronominal split antecedence is consistent with the Principle B effect, just as in English. Third, we have claimed that in the case of both anaphor binding and pronominal binding, the Korean adults show a strong preference toward the long-distance split antecedents. This in turn suggests that the adults do not entertain the hypothesis that anaphors and pronouns are in complementary distribution. In addition, the results of our experiment clearly illustrate the fact that in the case of reflexive binding, learning takes place through positive transfer and negative transfer of native binding. The results of our experiment also indicate that the adults did not completely capture the properties associated with English pronominal binding. This is motivated by the fact that English pronominal sentences pose a problem in applying Binding Principle B by the adults. We have also noted that the Korean learners of English did not judge split antecedence of English pronominals in accordance with their L1, namely transfer. Finally, we have argued that in the case of pronominal binding, the acquisition of long-distance binding in L2 English by the Korean learners may be affected by Universal Grammar, whereas in the case of anaphor binding, the acquisition of long-distance binding in L2 English by the Korean learners may not. Thus it seems reasonable to conclude that Binding Condition B may be part of the innate endowment that children bring to the language acquisition task, but Binding Condition A may not.

Kes in HiRC constructions cannot be an expletive such as there or it in English. More specifically, kes in HiRC constructions is a demonstrative anaphoric proform referring to the preceding subject or object within the relative clause. Kes in HiRC constructions bears phi-features such as person or number and semantic contents. Kes in HiRC constructions is an anaphoric pronominal: that is, kes in HiRC constructions bears an anaphoric property, even though it is not c-commanded (Kwon 2010). Kes in HiRC constructions can be substituted by the demonstrative anaphor ku casin ‘the himself’ or ku kes ‘the thing’, according to whether it refers to the preceding [+human] or [-human] singular subject or object within the relative clause. Principle A cannot regulate the demonstrative anaphor ku casin. In this vein, it has been shown that the demonstrative anaphoric proform kes in HiRC constructions is compatible, even though it is not c-commanded by its precedent: that is, the demonstrative anaphoric kes in HiRC constructions is Principle A-free. While the donkey anaphora can appear as a pronominal in English, kes in HiRC constructions cannot be replaced by the third person pronoun. Unlike the noun or pronoun kes, kes in HiRC constructions can refer to the respected or the noble, since it can bear the same syntactic and semantic properties as its honorific precedent.

In this paper, we argue, in support of the revised version on Principle A, that demonstrative binding is possible if one or the other occurrence of the third person is put forth as if it were a demonstrative. We contend that Principle A must be understood as a condition of demonstrative binding in Korean, thereby suggesting that Principle B does not regulate demonstrative binding. Under Higginbotham’s (1992) proposal, whereby demonstratives can stand apart from the disjointness conditions, Principle B functions so as to exclude the possibility of common reference. The central idea of our analysis, however, is that in the case of Korean demonstrative binding, Principle A functions so as to include the possibility of common reference. Even if two elements have the same coindex, one cannot determine that they have the same value without the speaker’s intention. We present evidence from the previous approaches that kare ‘he’ and ku ‘he’ cannot be bound by a quantifier irrespective of domains. However, the previous approaches are undermined by the fact that Principle A restricts demonstrative binding in Korean. The crucial evidence against the previous approaches is based on the observation that the demonstrative ku ‘he’ admits a bound variable reading and that Principle A constrains demonstrative binding through common reference arising from the speaker’s intention. In conclusion, while variable binding and demonstrative variable binding seem to be considered as having the same semantic relations, the latter is not claimed to be subject to Principle B.

Reinforcement learning (RL) is fundamental to current artificial intelligence (AI). Since dynamic programming, which is based on Richard Bellman’s principle of optimality, is the basis of RL (and other AI disciplines such as A* search), it is important to apply that principle correctly and artfully. This tutorial uses examples, many from published articles, to examine both the artful and occasionally erroneous application of Bellman’s principle. Our contribution is twofold. First, we emphasize the necessity of a general thought experiment by asking what we call “consultant questions” to determine the proper state space for DP formulation to be established by Bellman’s optimality principle. Second, we convey the role of art based on common sense and effortful cleverness in designing efficient DP. Since Bellman’s principle is intuitive based on common sense, it is sometimes misunderstood. For illustrative purposes, given a directed acyclic graph (DAG), we consider four deterministic minimum-cost path network problems (found in the literature), each bringing up some validity issue concerning Bellman’s principle on a different criterion. We approach them consistently by the conventional wisdom of state augmentation (on top of the physical system state space). As a result, we show that our artful choice of state description not only renders the principle valid in each problem, but also makes each DP as efficient as the standard DP that solves a shortest-path problem in the same DAG, circumventing successfully the so-called curse of dimensionality, a price to be paid frequently by state enlargement. After that, we discuss the potential importance of the treated type of path network problems for practical applications (e.g., communications network).

In this paper, a long distance binding of reflexives in Northeast Asian languages such as Korean, Japanese and Chinese is revisited with Binding Principle A in Chomsky (1981). It is argued that the apparent differences between English and Northeast Asian languages result from the interaction of the ECP, depending on whether Infl is a lexical or a functional category. In addition, it is assumed that reflexives can be divided into two different forms: nonphrasal forms (casin, zibun, ziji in Northeast Asian langauges) vs. phrasal forms (himself, myself etc. in English). Nonphrasal form reflexives can be either local or long distant, whereas phrasal form reflexives are strictly local. Thus, seemingly different bounded dependencies between reflexives and their antecedents can be accounted for by the same principle with parameters.

본 논문은 연간 구매수량의 일정비율에 해당하는 물품을 무상으로 공급받은 물품이 관세법 시행령 제17조의 무상수입물품에 해당되는지를 판단한 판례로, 무상공급된 물품이 수량할인 에 해당된다는 수입자의 주장과 대가를 지급하지 않고 공급받은 무상수입물품에 해당된다는 과세당국의 주장에 대한 법원의 판단을 검토하였다. 1심과 2심은 과세당국의 손을 들어주었으나, 대법원은 이 사건 계약이 연간 구매수량의 일정 비율에 해당하는 물품의 추가 공급이 예정된 연간 구매계약으로, 잠정적인 기본가격을 설정하 고 연간 구매수량에 따라 추가 공급수량이 확정되면 연간 총지급액과 연간 총구매수량에 따라 1년 단위로 최종적인 거래가격이 결정되는 구조의 계약으로 무료샘플이 무상으로 수입되었다 고 볼 수 없다고 판시했다. 이러한 대법원의 판결은 명목상 무상물품이라도 그 실질이 유상구매와 같다면 총금액을 총수 량으로 안분한 단가가 적정한 과세가격이고, 무상물품의 과세가격 판단 시 해당 거래의 실질 에 대한 정확한 판단이 필요함을 시사하고 있다. 그러나 거래의 실질에 근거한 수량할인 형태의 무상물품에 대한 과세가격 결정기준이 명확하지 않은 상황으로, 거래가격에 따른 과세가격을 결정함에 있어 가격할인 또는 수량할인과 관련한 구체적인 기준을 마련하는 것이 필요하다. 이를 위해 타 국가들의 수량할인과 관련된 사례에 적용된 세부기준들을 검토하여 기준을 마련하는 것이 권고된다. 과세당국의 이러한 기준이 명 확하게 제시될 때 기업 및 과세당국 간의 충돌로 인한 행정적 비용 낭비 및 관세포탈을 예방할 수 있을 것이다.

Purpose : This study introduces the U.S. standards applied in determining quantity discounts to ascertain whether imported goods free of charge, equivalent to a certain percentage of the annual purchase quantity, fall under free import goods as stipulated in Article 17 of the Enforcement Decree of the Customs Act. Then, we would like to analyze Korean precedent based on those standards. Research design, data, methodology : This study analyzes the precedents of the first, second, and third trials related to the imposition of taxes on goods supplied free of charge(Hanmi Pharmaceutical v. Seoul Regional Customs). Results : The Supreme Court's ruling that “free samples imported under a contract in which additional goods are supplied according to the annual purchase quantity cannot be considered to have been imported free of charge” requires an accurate judgment on the substance of the transaction. Conclusions : Customs authorities must establish specific standards related to price discounts or quantity discounts when determining the customs value based on the transaction price. For customs authorities, it is recommended to review the detailed standards applied in relation to quantity discounts in other countries. In addition, when these standards of customs authorities are clearly presented, it will be possible to prevent the waste of administrative costs caused by conflicts between companies and customs authorities and customs evasion.

해상물건운송에 관한 국제협약의 핵심은 운송인의 책임이라고 할 수 있다. 즉 운송인은 해상물건운송에 관한 국제협약 및 각국의 관련 법에 의해 운송물의 인도지체, 훼손 및 멸실에 대한 책임을 져야만 한다. 일반적으로 운송인의 책임체제는 여러 가지 측면을 포함하고 있는데, 그것은 책임의 기초, 책임의 주체, 책임의 기간, 책임의 제한 등이다. 해상물건운송에 관한 국제협약의 발전에 따라서 운송인의 책임 의 기초가 변화되고 있음을 발견할 수 있다. 즉 국제거래 및 국제운송의 발전에 따라서 선박소유자와 적하소유자의 힘이 변화하면, 새로운 국제협약이 나타나고, 이에 따라 국제운송의 발전이 촉진되었다. 본 논문에서는 운송인의 책임원칙을 분석하고, 중국해상법과 로테르담규칙, 기타 국제협약 및 각국의 관련법에 대한 철저하고 깊은 비교와 연구를 통해 중국의 해상법을 보다 완벽하게 하기 위한 입법제안을 하고자 한다. 결론적으로 운송인의 책임원칙과 관련하여 로테르담규칙이 채택하고 있는 완전과실책임원칙이 합리적이라고 생각되며, 중국해상법은 로태르담규칙이 채택하고 있는 완전과실책임원칙을 수용하여야 한다고 본다. 즉 시대의 요구와 특징에 부응하여 항해과실면책을 폐지함으로써 중국해상법의 선진화를 도모하는 것이 바람직하다고 생각된다.

본 연구는 ‘금융소비자보호에관한법률(이하, 금융소비자보호법)’ 시행으로 위기에 직면한 인 슈어테크(InsurTech) 기업의 서비스 전략에 대한 연구이다. 본 연구는 미국, 영국 등 5개 선진국 가의 인슈어테크와 관련된 적합성에 대한 선행연구와 보험 및 소비자보호 법률을 기반으로 인슈어테크 기업에 대한 보험계약상 적합성의 원칙을 적용할 수 있는지에 대해 연구하였다. 분석 자료는 법제처와 각국의 법률 정보를 활용하였으며, 적합성에 대한 조만을 비교하는 방 식으로 연구하였다. 분석결과 적합성을 일괄적으로 적용하는 것이 어떤 결과를 가져올지에 대 해서는 논란이 있으나, 보험 산업에서 적합성 원칙을 확대 적용한다는 것은 현실적으로 필요 한 조치로 판단된다. 또한 금융투자업자가 적합성 원칙에 의해 부담하는 의무는 ‘적합한 투자 권유를 할 적극적 의무’가 아니라 ‘부적합한 투자권유를 하지 않을 소극적 의무’로 이해할 필 요가 있다. ‘인슈어테크’를 보험계약으로 인정되고 있으며 P2P보험은 플랫폼을 제공하고 위험 을 인수하지 않기 때문에 보험계약에서 보험자의 역할을 하고 있는지에 대한 문제가 존재할 수 있다. 따라서, ‘적합성 원칙’을 비롯한 소비자 보호 제도의 적용이 불가능할 수 있어 인슈어 테크를 통한 적합성의 원칙을 가장 잘 표현하고 있는 ‘know your customer rule’을 적극적으로 도입할 수 있도록 제정적 지원과 환경의 변화가 필요하다.

Purpose : This study is a study on the service strategies of InsurTech companies facing a crisis due to the enforcement of the Financial Consumer Protection Act. Research design, data, methodology : This study investigated whether the principle of suitability in insurance contracts for insurtech companies can be applied based on prior research and the laws of major countries. For the analysis data, the Ministry of Legislation and the legal information of each country was used, and the study was conducted in a way that compared articles about suitability. Results : Although there is some controversy about what kind of results will be obtained by applying the suitability as a result of the analysis, it is judged that the expanded application of the suitability principle in the insurance industry is a realistically necessary measure. In addition, it is necessary to understand that the obligation borne by a financial investment business entity under the suitability principle is not an 'active obligation to make appropriate investment recommendations' but a 'passive obligation not to make inappropriate investment recommendations'. Conclusions : Since ‘InsurTech’ is recognized as an insurance contract, and P2P insurance provides a platform and does not undertake risks, there may be a problem as to whether it is playing the role of an insurer in the insurance contract. Therefore, it may not be possible to apply consumer protection systems including the 'conformity principle'. Therefore, financial support and environmental change is needed.

The coexistence of the symmetries and asymmetries of coordinate structures has long been a challenge in the tradition of generative grammar. In most coordinate constructions, it is argued, symmetric coordination is maintained through feature mapping algorithms across all syntactic levels, which are first proposed in Velde (2005). In particular, the apparent asymmetric phenomenon like CSC is in fact the result of both symmetric feature mapping at lexical selection and Remerge in narrow syntax. In the approach to coordinate structures proposed here, which is based on the assumptions and principles of the Survive-minimalism (cf. Putnam and Stroik (2008) and Stroik and Putnam (2013)), the second conjunct, to which a coordinating conjunction has already adjoined due to its defectiveness instead of projecting its phrase, is right-adjoined to the last member of the first conjunct. The resulting structure implies that any elements in the first conjunct c-command those in the second conjunct, accounting for coordinate asymmetries structurally. Moreover, in a derivational way, we can account for the surprising Principle A symmetry in coordinate constructions, following Lebeaux’s (2009) suggestion about the domain of binding principles and Velde’s (2009) list-adjunction.

본 연구의 목적은 두 가지로 구성되어 있다. 먼저, 보충성원칙에 대한 단편적인 이해를 극복하고 보다 포괄적이고 통일적인 맥락에서 보충성을 파악하고자 한다. 이를 위해서 독일의 사회정책에서 보충성원칙이 어떻게 형성되었는가를 가톨릭 사회윤리의 발전을 중심으로 살펴보았다. 그리고 보충성원칙이 독일의 기본법에 어떻게 규정되어 있는가, 특히 기본법에서 국가와 가족과의 관계가 어떻게 규정되어 있는가를 고찰하였다. 두 번째의 목적은 최근의 저출산․고령화시대를 맞이하여 우리나라뿐만 아니라 전 세계적인 차원에서 점점 중요성이 강조되고 있는 가족정책 영역에서 보충성원칙이 어떻게 적용될 수 있는가를 독일의 경험을 중심으로 검토하는 것이다. 이를 위해서 최근 가족정책에서 중요한 개념으로 등장한 ‘선택의 자유’(Wahlfreiheit)가 보충성원칙과 어떻게 조응할 수 있는지를 살펴보고, 보충성원칙의 적용으로서 지역차원의 가족복지정책을 검토하였다. 이를 통해 가족에 대해서 개인, 지역 및 국가가 책임져야 할 범위는 어디까지인가에 대한 보다 근본적인 질문에 대한 해답을 모색하고자 하였다.

The purpose of this paper is to examine how the principle of subsidiarity is applied in family policy in Germany. The principle of subsidiarity is based on the social ethics of Catholic Church. Through this study, it is attempted to investigate the family related clauses in basic law and find an application of principle of subsidiarity in the family policy in Germany. The principle of subsidiarity has both positive and negative characteristics. Traditionally, the negative characteristics is emphasized, but recently nation's active intervention in the family is justified by the positive characteristics of priciple of subsidiarity.

대부분 한국 기독교인들은 정교분리 원칙이 종교가 정치에 대해서 말하지 않는 것, 교회는 모든 권세에 순복할 것이라고 인식하고 있다. 그런데 한국에 기독교를 전해주었고, 또한 정교분리 원칙을 처음으로 시행한 사람들이 미국선교사들이었기 때문에 한국의 기독교인들은 마치 미국 선교사들이 대부분의 한국 교인들이 이해하고 있는 그런 내용의 정교분리 원칙을 한국 교회에 심어준 것으로 생각하고 있다. 그러나 미국선교사들은 18세기 미국 청교도 시대에 형성되었고 당시 미국인들의 의식 속에 자리 잡고 있는 정교분리의 원칙을 전한 것이었다. 그리고 선교사들이 가지고 있었던 정교분리 원칙이 무엇인지 잘 나타낸 것이 바로 3.1운동이후 선교사들이 조선통독부에 건의 한 <건백서>이다. 우리가 살펴본 대로 <건백서>에서 선교사들은 일본정부가 조선통감부 시절부터 실시해왔던 포교규칙의 모든 보고제도를 폐지할 것을 주장하였다. 이것은 미국 선교사들의 의식속에 있는 정교분리 원칙이 국가가 종교에 관여해서는 안 되고 정부의 행정력에 의해 종교의 자유가 제한되어서는 안 된다는 청교도적 정교분리 원칙에 대한 이해가 있음을 나타내는 것이다. 또한 일본정부가 조선의 기독교 사립학교들에 대해서 천황 숭배를 강요할 때, 선교사들은 이를 거부하고 조선인들에게 양심에 따라 정부의 명령을 거부할 수 있는 양심의 자유를 허용해 줄 것을 요구했다. 미국선교사들이 이해하고 있는 정교분리 원칙은 정부가 종교문제에 개입하는 것은 잘못이며, 정부의 관원은 종교적인 견해를 이유로 사람들을 처벌할 권리를 갖고 있지 않다는 것이었다. 그런데 종교를 국민 교화의 도구로 혹은 정부 시책을 국민들에게 알리고 계도하는 정부의 기구로 이해하는 포학적인 일본의 군국주의자들의 통치 상황 하에서 정교분리원칙을 훼손하는 많은 종교정책을 실행하는 과정에서 한국교회 지도자들과 성도들은 정교분리 원칙이 교회가 정치에 대하여 말하지 않고 관여하지 않는 것으로 또한 교회는 정부에 대해서 무조건 협조하고 순종해야 한다고 받아들이게 된 것이다.

Mostly Korean Christians is recognizing that a principle of the separation of church and government is religious about politics and a church is obedient to all powers. By the way, Korean Christians are handed down to things following by American missionaries : introducing into Christianity to Korea, and planting a principle of the separation of church and government, and enforcing for the first time the principle. However, it was to have come down on the principle which American missionaries were formed in the Puritan times American the 18th century, and a seat was catching in at that time American consciousness. And it is just a written memorial having done a suggestion to a Chosun Tongdog Bu after Samil Independence Movement in 1919 that the principle how missionaries had it showed what there is well. Like our watching, missionaries in the written memorial insisted to abolish all reports system of the propagation rule that the Japanese government had executed from Chosun Tongdog Bu period. This is for there be understanding regarding the principle of Puritan that a nation shall not participate to a religion, and freedom of religion by governmental administrative power had not to be limited, and the principle in consciousness of American missionaries to show. And therefore, when the Japanese government compelled Emperor worship about Christian private schools of Chosun, missionaries should have permitted the early freedom of conscience that they refused it, and can refuse a governmental command by conscience of Chosun. The principle how American missionaries were understanding it was thing that governmental staff of a section didn't have wrong rights to punish people because of the religious opinions the government intervening in a religious issue. But, Under rule situations of a tyrannical militarists Japanese on a tool of national reformation to a religion understanding to an organization of the government, and in processes performing a lot of religious policies to damage the principle, Korean church leaders and christians are what they were accepted that, also, a church cooperates about the governments, and they shall be obedient to what a church becomes quiet about politics, and the principle doesn't participate in.

동서양을 막론하고 역사 속에 구현된 일련의 사실과 현재 일어나고 있 는 사건들은 우리가 흔히 알고 있는 것과 다름이 많다. 왜곡된 사실과 그 것을 통한 잘못된 인식은 우리의 발전적 미래에 전혀 도움이 되지 않을 뿐 아니라 인간이 추구해야 할 진리와 정의와 같은 근본적 가치를 훼손하 기 때문에 반드시 바로 잡아야 할 근거를 갖는다. 소위 기술시대, 첨단과학의 시대라 불리는 지금, 우리는 지금 무수히 많은 매체를 통한 정보의 홍수 속에서 살고 있다. 그러나 그 정보들은 진 실을 말하고 있는가? 많은 수용자들은 그것에 대해 올바른 판단을 할 수 있는가? 이와 같은 물음에 브레히트와 알튀세르의 이론은 예술적, 철학 적 방향을 제시한다. 모든 예술과 사상이 인간이 추구해야 할 가치, 그리고 역사에 대한 성찰과 사회 개선에 목적을 둔다면 지식인들이나 예술가들의 의무는 명백 하다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 브레히트의 연극이론과 알튀세르의 호명이 론을 중심으로 무대예술로서의 사회극의 창작 원리와 사회적 기능에 대 해 고찰하였다.

We can see clearly many differences between the truth of historical events and incidents of the present, and what we commonly know about them. Because distorted truths and wrong understandings not only don’t help our future but also damage the fundamental value that people have to persue qualities such as truth and justice, we must correct them. In a so-called ‘age of high technology’ and ‘age of science’, we receive a lot of information through various mediums, but do they report the truth? Do we judge correctly? Bertolt Brecht and Louis Pierre Althusser present artistic and philosophical directions with regard to these questions. If in every study and thought, people’s pursuits must have value, and if they must have the purpose of reflecting history and improving society, it is obvious that intellectuals and artists have certain obligations. In this paper, I considered a principle and function that social theater could have.

이 연구의 목적은 아츠프로펠(Arts PROPEL)을 적용한 음악감상수업 원리를 연구하는 데 있 다. 이를 위해 아츠프로펠과 음악감상수업 단계, 아츠프로펠을 적용한 음악감상학습에 대해 고 찰하였다. 이러한 내용을 기반으로 감각적 감상, 분석적 감상, 심미적 감상 단계를 음악감상수 업 도메인 프로젝트의 하위 도메인으로 설정하여 9가지 원리를 연구하고 적용하였다. 이러한 결 과에 근거하여 실질적 적용을 위해 다음과 같이 제언한다. 첫째, 교사는 학생들에 대한 충분한 관심과 소통이 요구된다. 둘째, 감상 곡에 대한 교사의 충분한 이해가 필요하다. 셋째, 교사는 학생의 흥미와 창의성을 유도하는 다양한 활동을 통한 교수 학습 방법에 대해 늘 상고하여야 한다. 넷째, 자기 생각을 자유롭게 표현하고 이야기 할 수 있는 수업 분위기를 조성해야 한다. 다섯째, 포트폴리오의 방대하고 사적인 자료들의 객관적 평가방법을 요구한다. 이 연구를 통해 아츠프로펠 음악감상수업 계획 수립을 위한 자료 제시에 도움이 되기를 기대한다.

The purpose of this research is to study the principle of music appreciation classes applying Arts PROPEL. For this, Arts PROPEL, music appreciation class process, and musical appreciation classes applying Arts PROPEL were explored. Based on the results, the process of sensuous appreciation, analytic appreciation, esthetic appreciation were established as the sub-domains of the musical appreciation class domain project for research and application. Based on the results, the following suggestions were made for practical application: first, teachers need to have sufficient interest in students and communicate with them. Second, teachers need to understand enough about songs to be appreciated. Third, teachers always need to examine the teaching-learning methods through various activities to encourage students’ interest and creativity. Fourth, it is required to create class atmosphere where students can freely express their thoughts. Fifth, it is necessary to evaluate the broad and private data of the portfolio objectively. This research is expected to be helpful to suggest data to establish plans for Arts PROPEL music appreciation classes.