Earticle

The Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc. for Public Works and the Compensation Therefor play a role as the framework act regarding the expropriation for public works and the compensation for their loss. In other acts, the special provisions against the same Act are prescribed and then the provisions of the same Act may apply mutatis mutandis with respect to the other matters. As a result, the provisions regarding the expropriation prescribed in each act has the standard pattern.However, the same Act may not play a role as the framework in case of entering land in possession of another person to inspect and to survey necessary for enforcing public-interest project, temporary using land in possession of another person as provisional loads, or changing/removing of obstacles. The same Act prescribes the matters about the requirements of entering land in possession of another person, the procedure, the compensation for loss, the penal provisions, etc. in detail, while the National Land Planning and Utilization Act also prescribes the matters about entering land in possession of another person, etc. in detail. In other acts, usually one of the two acts shall apply mutatis mutandis, and the way of applying is somewhat different. Even some acts may have an independent provision regardless of the two acts. As a consequence, the matters about preparation activities for enforcing public-interest project may not have the standard pattern and different contents may be prescribed in each act, which may cause a stir in legislation, interpretation, or application. This article will examine the legislative cases about entering land in possession of another person, etc. focusing on the Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc. for Public Works and the Compensation Therefor and the National Land Planning and Utilization Act, analyze the strengths and weaknesses, and present a proper legislative model based on the most reasonable legislative case.

It is valuable to learn various legal systems for understand foreign legal system, and enlarges the depth of academic. But more important, We should have drawn the lesson from the diversity, in order to provide direction for a number of legal dispute. Through the study of foreign legal system, study researchers should provide a clue to issues that can not solve within the existing legal system of academic theory. It is very valuable. Administrative Law does more. More depth studies in this area should be established and will improve the problems of existing laws. To do this, first, compensation and related issues in the current situation should determine what the key points. And we should understand the contents of the current legal system for the compensation. Second, from a legal dispute of the current legal system, we should understand that what should be particularly difficult to resolve legal disputes within the law system. Third, to solve the problem, we should be research a variety of compare legal system. For the reality of our system should be introduced. They do not fit the current situation, as the introduction of advanced system research for the value of the things should be. However, the foreign compensation system is inconsistent with our reality, or even reasonable, we can not sustain the compensation system. It is not worth more than the study. Limited research of a specific country is not desirable. This paper is about the UK's compensation system. It can be unfamiliar to us, but UK is already dealing with this issue since 1500. furthermore this paper was specifically analyzed on major legal issues, and develop lesson to come out of it. Based on the study on UK's compensation system, this paper offered improving our current compensation system.