Earticle

본 논문은 정부 R&D 투자의 우선순위 설정에서 작동하는 요소들을 검토하고, 그 과정에서 과학자 공동체 는 어떤 역할을 하는지 검토하였다. 최근 선진국들에서 대규모 연구들이 예상한 목표를 달성하지 못한 것으로 평가 됨에도 불구하고, 더 많은 대규모 연구들이 계획되고 추진되고 있다. 이러한 현상은 자원의 한정성이라는 근본적 문 제를 고려할 때, 역설적인 것이다. 우리나라에서 추진된 대규모 연구들을 살펴본 결과, 국민 및 미디어의 관심 등 정 치적 자원의 확보, 국가의 위상 제고, 기술자립을 통한 경제적 효과 제고 등의 요인들이 작동하는 것을 확인하였다. 그리고 그 과정에서 과학자 공동체는 전문성과 합리성에 따라 연구 과제를 선택하는 합리적 전문가로서 행동하는 것 뿐만 아니라 자기 분야의 대규모 연구 과제들이 채택되도록 노력하는 정치적 행위자로서 행동한다는 것을 확인하였 다. 본 논문은 정부 R&D 투자의 우선순위 설정에서 대규모 연구에 대한 조급한 투자 결정을 줄이기 위해 공적 담 론이나 국회의 심도 있는 심사 등의 새로운 절차가 필요함을 제시하였다.

This article has reviewed some possible factors of priority setting in the government R&D investment, and also reviewed the roles of scientific community. Recently many development countries have planned more and more large-scale researches which require huge resources. Many large-scale researches have presented strikingly poor performance records in terms of efficiency. Nevertheless, more and more large-scale researches have been selected and executed. According to this article, some factors such as attracting attention of the media and the public, enhancing national prestige, raising the technological independence for economic growth were raised. As implications for policy, this article presented a necessity of strengthening the public control for priority setting of government R&D investment. And new procedures such as public discourse and National Assembly's in-depth deliberation were presented.

최근 발생하고 있는 기후변화는 전세계적으로 많은 피해를 발생시키고 있다. 한반도의 기존 강우형태는 장시간에 걸친 강우와 발생기간을 예측할 수 있었으나, 기후 변화로 인한 강우 형태의 변화는 기존에 마련한 위기대응방안이 무용한 상황을 만들고 있다. 2022년 8월 집중호우로 인해 서울·경기·강원·충남 등 10개 지자체가 특별재난지역으로 우선 선포되었다. 도시화에 따른 불투수면적의 증가와 건물의 지하 공간의 활용 증가하고 있는 가운데 기후 변화로 인한 집중호우는 도심지 내 하수관로 설계용량을 초과하 는 경우가 빈번해지고 있으며, 범위는 국부적이지만 피해의 규모는 커지는 사례들이 증가하고 있다. 도시침수는 다양한 조건에 의해 침수범위가 결정되며 불시에 일어나는 침수의 형태로 인해 신속한 침수상황 인지 및 위기대응이 필요하다. 이를 위하여 AI기반 영상분석 기술을 통해 전국에 분포되어 있는 CCTV를 활용하여 침수상황을 상시 모니터링 할 수 있는 시스템 구축이 필요하며, 정형화된 IoT기반 실시간 계측센서 데이터와 비정형 데이터인 CCTV영상을 분석하고 연계한 새로운 형태의 도시침수 모니터링 기술이 필요하다.

Recently, climate change has caused a lot of damage worldwide. Existing rainfall patterns on the Korean Peninsula could predict long-term rainfall patterns and periods, but changes in rainfall patterns due to climate change made crisis response measures useless. Due to heavy rain in August 2022, 10 local governments, including Seoul, Gyeonggi, Gangwon, and Chungnam, were declared as special disaster areas for the first time. As the impermeable area increases due to urbanization and the use of the underground space of buildings increases, the design capacity of sewage pipes is often exceeded, and the scope is local but the damage scale is increasing. Urban floods require rapid situational awareness and crisis response. To this end, it is necessary to establish a system that can monitor the flood situation at all times using CCTV distributed across the country through AI-based image analysis technology, and a new type of urban flood monitoring technology that analyzes and links it based on standardized IoT unstructured data such as real-time measurement sensor data and CCTV images is required.

지자체 저수지의 노후화가 극심한 가운데 저수지의 하류부 친수공간확대로 인하여 거주인구의 생활공간 이 증가하고 있으며 지자체 저수지의 실질적인 재난대응체계 마련이 미흡하여 매년 이상기후에 따른 피해사례가 발생하고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 위치정보 및 속성정보 확인이 가능한 지자체가 관할 저수지 13,118개소를 대상으로 경과년도와 하류부 인명 및 시설피해규모 분석결과를 바탕으로 위험특성 유형을 분류하고 각 우선적 관리 대책전략을 제시하였다. 전국 분석대상 저수지 13,118개 중 9,139개 (69%)가 시설 유지 및 관리에 우선적인 유형으로 식별되었고, 6,044개(46%)가 하류지역 피해예방 지원사 업에 우선적인 유형으로 확인되며, 3,495개(26%)가 비상대처계획(EAP)에 우선적으로 필요한 유형으로 확인되었다. 본 연구방법론을 토대로 저수지의 잠재적 위험특성을 분석하고 우선적으로 관리가 필요하 다고 판단되는 저수지를 도출하여, 저수지와 하류지역에 대한 관리방향을 수립할 수 있는 기초자료를 구축할 필요성이 있다.

While the local reservoirs are aging severely, the resident's living space is increasing due to the expansion of amenity space downstream of the reservoir. Additionally, damage cases due to abnormal weather occur every year due to lack of practical disaster measures. This study categorized risk characteristics based on the elapsed years and the scale of human and facility damage downstream for 13,118 reservoirs under the jurisdiction of local governments, which can provide location and attribute information. It proposed priority management strategies for each category. 9,139(69%) of the analyzed subjects were identified as priority types for facility maintenance and management, 6,044(46%) were identified as priority types for downstream damage prevention support projects, and 3,495(26%) were identified as priority types for an EAP(Emergency Action Plan). Based on this research methodology, it is necessary to analyze the potential risk characteristics of reservoirs and derive reservoirs that are deemed to need management first, and establish basic data to establish management directions for reservoirs and downstream areas.

본 연구는 인공지능 의료 제품 및 서비스에 대한 국민의 선호도를 파악해 시사점을 제공하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 7가지 인공지능 의료 제품 및 서비스를 대상으로 BWS 설문조사를 수행하였고, 총 663명의 응답자 설문결과를 계량경제학적 모형으로 추정하여 선호도를 파악하였다. 응답자들은 ‘암 진단과 치료 제언’, ‘질병관련 모니터링’, ‘방사선, 심혈관 등 영상 이미지 자동 분석 / 예측 제공’, ‘혈액 검사와 결과 제공’, ‘수술 중 혈액 등 신체지표 모니터링’, ‘생활습관 관련 모니터링 및 조언’, ‘가상의료 전문가와의 상담 및 진단’ 순으로 인공지능 의료 제품 및 서비스에 대한 선호도가 높았다. 응답자들을 연령, 소득, 건강관리에 관한 관심 정도 등에 따라 세분화하여 추정한 결과에서도 선호도 우선순위 결과는 달라지지 않고 일관되었다. 본 연구결과는 국민들이 인식하는 인공지능 의료 서비스 분야 내 상대적 중요도와 선호도를 파악하였다는 점에서 향후 관련 정책수립 및 사업추진 방향 설정에 참고 자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

This study aims to analyze public preference for the fields of artificial intelligence medical products and services. A BWS survey on artificial intelligence medical products and services was conducted with 663 respondents; the survey results were estimated using an econometric model. Based on the results, respondents preferred the following, in the order of most preferred first: 1) suggestions for cancer diagnosis and treatment; 2) disease-related monitoring; 3) automatic analysis/prediction of images such as radiation and cardiovascular systems; 4) blood tests and presentation of test results; 5) monitoring body indicators such as blood during surgery; 6) monitoring and advice related to lifestyle; 7) consultation and diagnosis with a virtual medical professional. In particular, it was confirmed that the results of priority setting for AI medical products and services was consistent regardless of age, income, and level of interest in healthcare. The results of preference for artificial intelligence medical products and services perceived by the people who are taxpayers and beneficiaries of medical policies can contribute to establishing medical policies and setting program directions.

지역보건의료사업의 효과성과 효율성을 개선하기 위해 지역사회 요구에 기반한 우선순위과제가 선정되어 추진되고 있으나, 선정방법의 체계적인 사용이 이루어지지 못하고 있다. 본 연구는 우선순위선정 방법의 개선방안을 제시하고자 수행되었다. 81개의 지역보건의료계획에서 사용된 우선순위선정에 대해 방법 및 기준의 빈도를 파악하고, 각 방법이 제시한 내용을 바탕으로 실제 사용의 적절성을 분석하였다. 우선순위선정을 위한 분석대상으로 건강문제가 아닌 사업 자체를 하고 있는 경우가 많았다. 가장 많이 사용된 우선순위선정 방법은 Basic priority rating 이었으며 다음은 우선순위화 매트릭스이었다. 우선순위기준 중 문제의 크기를 보면, 만성질환에서는 유병률, 건강행위에서는 주로 건강문제를 가진 사람의 비율이 지표로 사용되고 있었다. 문제의 크기를 비롯하여 심각성, 중재 효과 등의 우선순위선정 기준이 객관적 자료 없이 평가되고 있었으며, 점수화기준도 명확하지 않았다. 우선순위선정의 분석대상을 건강문제로 한정하고, 건강문제 영역별로 점수화 기준을 제시해 줄 필요가 있다.

While the method of prioritization has been practicing in the community needs-based programs to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of community health planning, it has not been systematically used. This study aims to suggest more sophisticated method of prioritizing. Based on the analysis of 81 community health plans which adopt prioritizing method, this study tried to examine their methods and criteria and evaluate their adequacy. In the prioritization process, projects themselves, rather than health problems, were commonly adopted for the subject of the analysis. The most used was the Basic priority rating, followed by the Prioritization matrix. Looking at the size of health problem among the prioritization criteria, the prevalence for chronic diseases and the proportion of people with health problems for health behaviors, mainly were used as indicators. Along with the size of health problem, other factors such as the degree of seriousness of health problem, and the effectiveness of intervention have been used as the criteria of prioritizing, not fully supported by objective data base and the clear standard of scoring. In the prioritization, the analysis need to be limited only to health problems, and the scoring criteria for each health problem area be presented.

This study conducted an AHP analysis for experts in urban planning and regional development in order to derive the priority of urban policy. As a result of analyzing the weight of each respondent by policy, the weights of the areas of culture and tourism development and manufacturing competitiveness were high in the large category, and the weights of culture and tourism resource development and strategic industry development were high for the small category. When classifying respondents as residents and non-residents, residents rated transportation weights higher than non-residents, and the two sides also ranked somewhat differently among the sub-categories. This difference is interpreted as being related to policy interest. Expert questionnaires can be used in the process of establishing city's development direction and prioritizing policies, and to reach a reasonable conclusion, it is necessary to check the respondent's residency characteristics and to fully understand objective values. In the process of establishing city's development direction and prioritizing policies, expert questionnaires can be used. In order to reach a reasonable conclusion through this, it is necessary to check the respondent's residency characteristics, and the process of sufficiently deliberating about objective values should be followed.

The purpose of this paper is an application of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) in the priority setting of promising technology in division of senior friendly product based on the previous studies. In this paper, the decision criteria for evaluating promising technologies in division of senior friendly product are identified and the hierarchical structure of decision making process is developed systematically. Subsequently the values of weights for relative importance among decision criteria are derived using AHP methodology, and the score of importance of promising technology in division of senior friendly product with respect to each criterion is evaluated. Finally the score of each promising technology in division of senior friendly product is quantified in order to prioritize them. We discuss implications of our results with a viewpoint of technology policy in division of senior friendly product.

OBJECTIVE This study aims to investigate the priority setting criteria that the public thinks appropriate for limited health care resources. METHODS Twelve adults who reside in Jinju were recruited for focus group interview. Participants were divided into two groups of six people each, and each discussion was moderated by the same researcher based on the same scenario. RESULTS As a result of the focus group interview in the two groups, we could identify various criteria involved in prioritizing limited health care resources. In general, accessibility to necessary medical services was considered a very important value, and it was important to guarantee access to basic medical care, equity in health care use, and support for socioeconomically vulnerable classes. It was also found that many participants considered protection from financial risks as a very important function of health insurance. However, participants were divided on how to allocate resources under the constraint of a limited budget. Some insisted that it was necessary to support the latest high-priced medical treatments as it is the obligation of the nation to protect the lives and health of people, while others insisted that it needs to be balanced considering both costs and benefits. CONCLUSION Overall, the results found that equity considerations are stronger than the support for the health maximization, which corresponds to the principle of utilitarian distribution. In addition, a big difference of opinions between generations was also discovered. Participants in their 20s, they paid more attention to cost-effectiveness than the other age group.

우리나라는 지난 2013년 북극이사회 옵서버 지위 획득의 후속 조치로 같은 해 12월 ‘북극정책기본계획’을 수립했다. 이는 우리나라 정부의 첫 공식 북극정책이다. 이 기본계획에 이은 2차 계획 성격인 ‘북극활동진흥기본계획’(2018-2022)이 2018년 발표되면서 우리나라 북극정책이 체계화되었다. 해양수산부는 또한 2018년 12월 ‘2050 극지비전’을 선포하여 우리나라 극지정책의 장기 비전도 마련하였다. 이 연구에서는 우리나라 북극정책 관련 국내외 선행연구를 분석하고, 북극정책기본계획, 북극활동진흥기본계획를 상호비교하여 정책 아젠다의 우선순위 변화를 살펴보았다. 그리고, 이 두 기본계획을 바탕으로 우리나라 북극정책 유형을 살펴보고 그 유형을 토대로 한 우리나라 북극정책 모형과 2050 극지비전 간 연계성을 검토하였다. 그 결과, 2050 극지비전이 두 기본계획과 같은 논리 구조로 하여 장기적인 정책적 기반을 제공하였음을 확인하였다. 한편 국내 전문가 설문조사를 통해 2050년 예상되는 극지분야 20개 도전과제를 제시하고 중요도에 따라 5개를 순서대로 선별토록 하여, 정책 우선순위를 분석하였다. 그리고, 분석결과를 기반으로 북극활동진흥기본계획의 정책아젠다 순위를 재구성하였다. 결론 부문에서 2013년의 북극정책기본계획과 2018년의 북극활동진흥기본계획 간 차이점을 통한 북극활동진흥기본계획의 특징을 검토한 후, 전문가 설문 분석결과를 토대로 한 우리나라 정책 우선순위를 제안하였다. 그리고, 정책의 이해관계자인 극지과학계, 업계 등의 입장에서 고려할 시사점과 대응방안을 도출하였다.

After gaining the Arctic Council Observer status in 2013, the Korean Government established the 1st Masterplan for the Arctic policy (2013-2017) as a follow-up action in the same year. The 2nd Masterplan for the second term (2018-2022) was adopted in July, 2018. Then, the Ministry of Ocean and Fishery (MOF) declared a statement during the Arctic Partnership Week in December, 2018 on the “2050 Polar Vision” to provide a long-term Arctic policy vision. This study reviews Korea’s Arctic Policies in terms of historical perspectives, and analyzed the differences between the 1st Masterplan (2013) and the 2nd Masterplan (2018) from the vision to action-plans. Korea’s Arctic Policy Model is developed as a part of the study, based on the categories of the policy contents of the “2050 polar vision”. As the next step, after identifying the changes in the direction of governmental-level policy between 2013 and 2018 masterplan, the study deducted perspectives, and implications based on those changes. Through expert-questionnaire analysis, the study sets the priority on the polar 20 challenges including Climate Change, Ecosystem Change, and Arctic Shipping, and suggests Korea’s future Arctic policy directions. Furthermore, considering the governmental policy change, the study suggests how the policy can provide responses for the domestic stakeholders, including R&D, Industries, and Academia.

Background: Selecting priority occupational carcinogens is important for cancer prevention efforts; however, standardized selection methods are not available. The objective of this paper was to describe the methods used by CAREX Canada in 2015 to establish priorities for preventing occupational cancer, with a focus on exposure estimation and descriptive profiles. Methods: Four criteria were used in an expert assessment process to guide carcinogen prioritization: (1) the likelihood of presence and/or use in Canadian workplaces; (2) toxicity of the substance (strength of evidence for carcinogenicity and other health effects); (3) feasibility of producing a carcinogen profile and/or an occupational estimate; and (4) special interest from the public/scientific community. Carcinogens were ranked as high, medium or low priority based on specific conditions regarding these criteria, and stakeholder input was incorporated. Priorities were set separately for the creation of new carcinogen profiles and for new occupational exposure estimates. Results: Overall, 246 agents were reviewed for inclusion in the occupational priorities list. For carcinogen profile generation, 103 were prioritized (11 high, 33 medium, and 59 low priority), and 36 carcinogens were deemed priorities for occupational exposure estimation (13 high, 17 medium, and 6 low priority). Conclusion: Prioritizing and ranking occupational carcinogens is required for a variety of purposes, including research, resource allocation at different jurisdictional levels, calculations of occupational cancer burden, and planning of CAREX-type projects in different countries. This paper outlines how this process was achieved in Canada; this may provide a model for other countries and jurisdictions as a part of occupational cancer prevention efforts.

Objectives: With growing attention on the healthcare industry as a potential market for big data and artificial intelligence inthe Fourth Industrial Revolution, countries around the world are introducing and developing various policies and projects relatedto health information technology (HIT). To assist prioritizing HIT topics in policy making, this study adopts the Delphitechnique to garner expert opinions from various fields of health informatics. Methods: Data were collected from November2019 to February 2020 using the Delphi technique through two rounds of surveys administered via email. The Delphi panelconsisted of 16 experts with a high level of experience in health informatics. They were from the Health Information PolicyAdvisory Committee of the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Korea, and the board of directors of the Korean Society ofMedical Informatics. The experts were asked to assess the importance, urgency, and difficulty of HIT topics in three domains:technology, application, and infrastructure. Results: Of the 40 topic items, a 100% agreement was reached for the importanceof 6 items, including 2 items in technology, 1 item in application, and 3 items in infrastructure domains. Especially, QuadrantI of a 2×2 matrix showing high importance and high urgency included 7 items in the technology domain, 2 items in the applicationdomain, and 13 items in the infrastructure domain. Conclusions: Most items with high importance and urgency belongedto the infrastructure domain. The findings indicated that fostering an infrastructural environment should be policeswith top priorities of HIT.

Background: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women in both developed and developing countries. The burden is increasing in low-income and middle-income countries (LMCs) and threatens the public health of such societies. Introduction of expensive monoclonal antibodies to cancer treatment regimens poses a real challenge in the health systems of LMCs. Despite controversy of cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab in breast cancer, some studies indicate gain of patients from this drug. The present study aimed to propose a priority setting model for administration of anti-angiogenic agents in breast cancer via assessment of tumor angiogenesis by the microvessel density (MVD) method and associations with clinicopathological characteristics (including simultaneous mutations of TP53 and HER-2 genes). Materials and Methods: Age, axillary lymph nodes status, tumor size, stage and grade, estrogen and progesterone receptors status, HER-2/neu status (by immunohistochemistry and FISH test), TP53 mutation, Ki-67 (for proliferation assay) and CD34 (for angiogenesis assay) were assessed in 111 breast cancer patients. The molecular subtype of each tumor was also determined and correlations of simultaneous mutations of HER-2 and p53 genes with angiogenesis and other clinicopathological characteristics were evaluated. Results: There were significant associations between simultaneous mutations of HER-2 and p53 genes and all other parameters except tumor size. The degree of angiogenesis in the ERBB2 subtype was greater than the others. Younger patients showed a higher angiogenesis rate rather those older than 50 years. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that patients with simultaneous mutations of HER-2 and p53 genes, those with ERBB2 molecular subtype and also younger women (often triple negative) seem more eligible for obtaining anti-angiogenic agents. These results suggest a model for priority setting of patients with breast cancer for treatment with anti-angiogenic drugs in LMCs.

MAUT and AHP are widely used for quantification of subjective judgements in various fields of decision making. This study focuses on the introduction and application of MAUT/AHP method which is a hybrid of MAUT and AHP techniques in R&D project priority setting. This hybrid model can clarify each factors' contribution using MAUT method and can reduce the number of pairwise comparisons of AHP method. This study applies AMUT/AHP method to the evaluation of R&D projects in a Government - funded research institute. To evaluate R&D projects, six evaluation factors are derived. SMART(Simple MultiAttribute Rating Technique) and DVM(Difference Value Measurement ) out of many MAUT methods are used to design the utility function ad AHP is used to allocate the weights among evaluation factors. The major findings of this study can be summarized as follows. First, the SMART/AHP and the DVM/AHP have the same results with the SMART and the DVM, and they are different results with AHP. It is very hard to decide which one is better. Second, MAUT/AHP's strength is analyzed. MAUT reflects utility values of evaluators to alternatives and AHP results objective and consistent weights of factors through pariwise comparisons. Third, its possible application fields are proposed. It is applicable to subjective decision making problems with high complexity and inter-independent factors.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has been challenging the healthcare service, i.e., the vitalization of the point of care accompanying self-testing in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDs). This study aims to suggest priority criteria to classify self-testing IVDs using the analytic hierarchy process technique. Methods: Two dimensions of the characteristics embedded in the IVDs and the diseases to be diagnosed with self-testing IVDs were parallelly considered and independently investigated. In addition, three expert panels consisting of laboratory medical doctors (n=11), clinicians (n=10), and citizens (n=11) who have an interest in the selection of self-testing IVDs were asked to answer to questionnaires. Priorities were derived and compared among each expert panel. Results: First of all, ease of specimen collection (0.241), urgency of the situation (0.224), and simplicity of device operation (0.214) were found to be the most important criteria in light of the functional characteristics of self-testing IVDs. Medical doctors valued the ease of specimen collection, but the citizen's panel valued self-management of the disease more. Second, considering the characteristics of the diseases, the priority criteria were shown in the order of prevalence of diseases (0.421), fatality of disease (0.378), and disease with stigma (0.201). Third, medical doctors responded that self-testing IVDs were more than twice as suitable for non-communicable diseases as compared to communicable diseases (0.688 vs. 0.312), but the citizen's group responded that self-testing IVDs were slightly more suitable for infectious diseases (0.511 vs. 0.489). Conclusion: Our findings suggested that self-testing IVDs could be primarily classified as the items for diagnosis of non-communicable diseases for the purpose of self-management with easy specimen collection and simple operation of devices, taking into account the urgency of the situation as well as prevalence and fatality of the disease.

본 연구는 경제가 가진 성장의 한계를 극복하고 새로운 도약의 계기를 마련하기 위해 새로운 성장동력산업의 발굴의 중요성을 인식하고, 미래성장동력으로서의 잠재력을 평가하기 위한 수단으로 한국미래기술지수(Korea Future Technology Index: KOFTI)를 개발하였다. 한국미래기술지수는 미래성장동력의 선정과 관련한 선행연구의 문제점을 보완하여 미래 성장동력 발굴의 객관성과 신뢰성 제고에 기여할 수 있는 종합지수이다. 본 연구는 경제성, 미래전략성, 기술영향력이라는 세 개별지수를 통합하는 한국미래기술지수를 설계하고, 이의 현장 적용성을 검증하기 위해 정부에서 추진 중인 신성장동력 사업의 62개 스타브랜드를 대상으로 실제 분석을 실시하여 13개 대표 스타브랜드를 도출하였다.

This paper aims at developing a new index that represents the Korean new growth industries, which is named the Korea Future Technology Index(KOFTI). The KOFTI is designed to provide a reliable and econometric index based on which the Korean government searches for new growth engines. The KOFTI is composed of three individual indexes such as the Economic Impact Index, the Future Strategy Index, and the Technological Influence Index. The KOFTI is applied for 62 star brands, which have been promoted by the Korean government for the korean future industrial competitiveness. The top 13 leading industries are drawn from the calculation of the KOFTI for 62 star brands.

In this study, priority setting model of new promising IT industries which will be the growth engines for the Korean IT industry, was established. Based on the AHP model, priority setting of IT new promising IT industries was conducted. Firstly, the selection cases of the new promising IT industries and major priority setting methodologies including the AHP methodology, were analyzed. The AHP model was selected as the most feasible methodology for priority setting of the new IT industries, among the various priority setting methodologies. Secondly, in setting up the AHP model for prioritization of the new promising If industries, a 'goal' was established to be priority setting of the new promising IT industries, and an 'alternatives' to be 18 new promising IT industries. Then a logical and a systematic assessment criteria including 5 main criteria('Technological Innovation', 'Market Ability', 'SPin-off Effect', 'Public Benefit', 'Strategic Importance') and 14 sub-criteria, were developed for priority setting of the 18 new promising industries. Finally, with the AHP model, the substantial analysis was made to set up priority of the 18 new promising IT industries. The substantial analysis showed the following priority setting results and implications for the 18 new promising IT industries.

본 연구에서는 사전에 수행된 델파이 조사의 기초자료를 통하여 유통분야의 미래유망기술을 AHP 방법을 사용하여 우선순위를 설정하였다. 조사방법은 10명의 전문가에게 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 조사결과는 AHP의 분석 소프트웨어인 EC2000를 이용하여 분석하였다. 분석결과 평가대항목간 중요도에서는 시장성이 0.495로 가장 중요하게 나타났으며, 기술성이 0.261, 그리고 공공성은 0.244로 나타났다. 각 평가소항목의 세부적 중요도는 기술성 측면에서는 기술파급성, 기술실현성, 기술독창성 순으로, 시장성 측면에서는 투자수익성, 시장성장성, 시장규모성 순으로, 공공성 측면에서는 산업파급성, 국가전략과의 부합성, 사회영향성 순으로 중요하게 나타났다. 각 기술군 중 중요도가 가장 높은 기술은 I군의 기술에서는 '수출입 농산물의 병ㆍ해충 검역 기술이 개발된다'의 기술이, 그리고 Ⅱ군의 기술에서는 '농축산물의 가공, 저장 및 유통 중 발생되는 유해성분 평가 및 제어 기술이 개발된다'의 기술로 나타났다.

The study focused on setting priority among future core technologies that were derived by Delphi in agricultural management ＆ information using AHP. Items for the setting priority were decided as 'technology', 'market', and 'public concerns' by council. The future core technologies were divided as four parts by importance and R＆D level. Technologies that are consisted with upper two parts that have high importance were considered in the study. Questionnaires were given to 10 specialists in division of postharvest agriculture. As the results, 'market' was decided as a most important item. The most important technologies number were PⅠ16 in group Ⅰ, and PⅡ12 in group Ⅱ.

2016년 제주방문 크루즈 관광객 수는 120만여 명으로 최고치를 달성하였으나, 사드사태 이후 지난 2년 간에 걸쳐 크루즈 관광객이 급감하였다. 따라서 방한 중국 단체관광시장이 금지된 이후에 제주특별자치도의 크루즈 관광전략에 대한 전반적인 검토가 필요한 시점이다. 본 연구는 사드사태 이후의 제주지역 크루즈관광 마케팅 및 관광수용태세 측면에서의 개선을 위한 제주특별자치도의 정책의사결정을 돕기 위해 크루즈관광 전략 우선순위를 선정하고자 하였다. 개선과제 우선순위를 도출하기 위해 교수 및 연구원, 지방자치단체 및 공사, 크루즈업계 등의 전문가집단을 대상으로 3회의 전문가조사를 실시했다. 15개의 세부과제에 대한 AHP 분석 결과, 기항지 관광프로그램 다양화 및 차별화, 크루즈관광객 대상 안내편의 제공, 크루즈관광객 대상 교통편의 제공, 크루즈 관광시장 다변화, CIQ 인력 확대 및 출입국절차 간소화, 크루즈 관광상품의 저가 관광구조 개선 등의 순으로 중요하게 인식하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 향후 제주특별자치도의 크루즈관광 정책 수립시 정책의사결정의 참고자료로 활용할 수 있을 것이다.

The number of cruise tourists visiting Jeju Island in 2016 reached a peak of 1.2 million, but the number of cruise tourists has decreased over the past two years since the THAAD deployment issue. Therefore, it is necessary to review the cruise tourism policy in Jeju Island after the prohibition of Chinese group travel to South Korea. The purpose of this study was to prioritize cruise tourism policy to help Jeju Island make a better decision for improvement of aspects marketing and readiness for cruise tourism market after the THAAD issue. In order to derive priorities for the improvement tasks, three expert surveys including professors and researchers, employees in local governments and related organizations, and staff in cruise and related industries were conducted. As a result of the AHP analysis, diversification and differentiation of destination products and programs was the most important task among the 15 detailed items. Provision of convenient information for cruise tourists, provision of convenient transportation for cruise tourists, diversification of cruise tourism markets, expansion of CIQ personnel and simplification of immigration procedures, cruise tourism And improvement of low-cost tourism structure of products follow in that order. The results of this study can be used as significant, fundamental information for better decision making in establishing cruise tourism marketing and policy in the future in Jeju Special Self-Governing Province.

2009년 건강보험 보험료율은 지난해와 같은 5.08%로 동결되는 등 재원확충은 점차 어려워지고 있지만, 의료서비스 공급자들에게 지불하는 진료수가는 평균 2.2% 인상되었고, 건강보험 보장성강화정책은 지속되고 있다. 재원확충이 뒷받침되지 않은 상황에서 지출규모를 증가시키는 방향으로 정책이 집행되고 있는 현재 국민건강보험의 지속가능성과 연계된 급여범위 설정을 위한 보건의료 자원할당에 관한 우선순위 논의는 사회적으로 공론화되지 못하고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 보건의료정책의 정당성을 확보하기 위한 사회적 합의에 기초한 보건의료 자원할당 우선순위 선정의 제도적인 틀을 어떠한 형태로 구축할 수 있는가를 분석하였다. 국민들의 직접 참여 또는 국민을 대표할 수 있는 집단들이 사회적으로 합의한 건강보험 재원 할당의 우선순위 원칙에 기초하여 보험자, 의료서비스 공급자와 전문가가 합의한 우선순위 선정의 세부 기준을 수립하고, 그 기준에 따른 급여 항목과 대상의 결정 및 이를 위한 재원확보를 뒷받침할 수 있는 기전의 확립이 국민건강보험 재원할당의 우선순위 선정의 체계의 핵심이라고 할 수 있다. 즉, 지속가능하고 보다 공정한 보건의료 자원할당이 가능하려면 국민들의 참여를 보장하고 참여한 국민의 대표에게 정보를 지속적으로 제공하여 대표성, 투명성, 공정성을 담보할 수 있게 함으로써 국민으로부터 형식적일뿐만 아니라 실질적인 정당성을 획득할 수 있는 의사결정기구로 구조화될 필요가 있다. 2007년 ‘차세대 건강보장 혁신위원회’ 산하의 건강보장미래전략위원회가 제시한 ‘가입자위원회’가 하나의 사례가 될 수 있다.

The priority setting based on social consensus related to the financial substantiality and benefits range of the National Health Insurance is social not discussed as before. This Study dealt with a Korean model of the priority setting based on social consensus in health care. Related to the NHI, this study focused on the objects, levels and mechanism of the priority setting in health care as well as the recent international discussions on this theme. The particular criteria after the principle based on the social consensus can acquire the legitimation for the decision of the expanding benefit catalogue of the NHI. The establishment of the priority setting based on social consensus leads the restructuralization of the present decision-making framework of the NHI for the purpose of the national participation.