Earticle

현재 위치 Home

보건의료 자원배분의 우선순위 설정기준 탐색
Exploring Priority Setting Criteria for Limited Health Care Resources

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    한국보건사회약료경영학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    한국보건사회약료경영학회지 바로가기
  • 통권
    Volume7 Number1 (2019.02)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.60-66
  • 저자
    배은영, 고민지, 배그린, 이보람, 임민경
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A353014

※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

원문정보

초록

영어
OBJECTIVE This study aims to investigate the priority setting criteria that the public thinks appropriate for limited health care resources. METHODS Twelve adults who reside in Jinju were recruited for focus group interview. Participants were divided into two groups of six people each, and each discussion was moderated by the same researcher based on the same scenario. RESULTS As a result of the focus group interview in the two groups, we could identify various criteria involved in prioritizing limited health care resources. In general, accessibility to necessary medical services was considered a very important value, and it was important to guarantee access to basic medical care, equity in health care use, and support for socioeconomically vulnerable classes. It was also found that many participants considered protection from financial risks as a very important function of health insurance. However, participants were divided on how to allocate resources under the constraint of a limited budget. Some insisted that it was necessary to support the latest high-priced medical treatments as it is the obligation of the nation to protect the lives and health of people, while others insisted that it needs to be balanced considering both costs and benefits. CONCLUSION Overall, the results found that equity considerations are stronger than the support for the health maximization, which corresponds to the principle of utilitarian distribution. In addition, a big difference of opinions between generations was also discovered. Participants in their 20s, they paid more attention to cost-effectiveness than the other age group.

목차

Abstract
서론
연구방법(Methods)
1. 조사대상
2. 조사방법
연구결과(Results)
1. 참가자 특성
2. 토론 결과
고찰 및 결론(Discussion & Conclusion)
감사의 말씀(Acknowledgement)
참고문헌 (References)

키워드

health maximization equity efficiency priority setting

저자

  • 배은영 [ Eun-Young Bae | 경상대학교 약학대학, 경상대학교 약학연구소 ] Corresponding author
  • 고민지 [ Minji Go | 경상대학교 약학대학 ]
  • 배그린 [ Green Bae | 이화여자대학교 약학대학 ]
  • 이보람 [ Bo Ram Lee | 서울대학교 보건대학원 ]
  • 임민경 [ Minkyeong Lim | 신한대학교 간호대학 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    한국보건사회약료경영학회 [Korean Academy of Social & Managed Care Phemacy]
  • 설립연도
    2009
  • 분야
    의약학>약학
  • 소개
    본 학회는 비영리 학술단체로서 환자의 삶의 질 향상을 위한 약료(pharmaceutical care)가 보장될 수 있도록 약료경영약학(managed care pharmacy)을 발전시키는 데 궁극 목적을 두고 다음과 같은 활동을 전개하여 사회에 기여하며 회원 상호간의 친목을 도모한다.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    한국보건사회약료경영학회지 [Journal of Korean Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy]
  • 간기
    반년간
  • pISSN
    2092-8394
  • 수록기간
    2009~2022
  • 십진분류
    KDC 518 DDC 615

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 한국보건사회약료경영학회지 Volume7 Number1

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장