Earticle

In spite of the development of the service industry, research on measuring customers' service satisfaction is far insufficient. Therefore, ways to measure the service qualify accurately need to be established due to the ambiguous types of service business. This research classifies the types of service business into service factory, service shop, mass service, professional service by using Schmenner's Service Process Matrix and conducts research on domestic literature that measured service satisfaction with Servqual and ServPerf. This study intends to suggest guidelines to measure customer satisfaction according to types of service business by researching ways to measure service satisfaction according to the types of service business and analysing the actual application methods based on a table that summarizes previous research on Servqual and Servperf.

In spite of the development of the service industry, research on measuring customers' service satisfaction is far insufficient. Therefore, ways to measure the service quality accurately need to be established due to the ambiguous types of service business. This research classifies the types of service business into service factory, service shop, mass service, professional service by using Schmenner's Service Process Matrix and conducts research on domestic literature that measured service satisfaction with Servqual and ServPerf. This study intends to suggest guidelines to measure customer satisfaction according to types of service business by researching ways to measure service satisfaction according to the types of service business and analysing the actual application methods based on a table that summarizes previous research on Servqual and Servperf.

In spite of the development of the service industry, research on measuring customers' service satisfaction is far insufficient. Therefore, ways to measure the service quality accurately need to be established due to the ambiguous types of service business. This research classifies the types of service business into service factory, service shop, mass service, professional service by using Schmenner's Service Process Matrix and conducts research on domestic literature that measured service satisfaction with Servqual and ServPerf. This study intends to suggest guidelines to measure customer satisfaction according to types of service business by researching ways to measure service satisfaction according to the types of service business and analysing the actual application methods based on a table that summarizes previous research on Servqual and Servperf.

오늘날 서비스기업에서는 다양한 방법을 통하여 고객 만족을 개선하려고 노력하고 있지만 큰 실효성을 보여주고 있지 않다. 본 연구는 품질차원의 이원적 측면을 바탕으로 하여 고객접촉정도에 따른 4가지 산업군을 연구대상(호텔․수리․교육․의료서비스)으로 선정하여 산업별로 품질의 이원적 측면을 비교․측정한 후, 이에 대한 개선 방안을 제시하는 것이다. 따라서 본 연구의 목적은 첫째, Schmenner의 서비스 프로세스 매트릭스를 기준으로 고객접촉정도에 따라 서비스산업을 선정하고 SERVQUAL을 이용하여 고객들이 원하는 요인에 대해 알아보고 Kano모형을 적용해 이를 서비스품질의 유형으로 구분하고, 둘째, Timko의 고객만족계수와 잠재적 고객만족 개선지수(PCSI Index)를 이용하여 각 산업별 우선고려사항을 도출하고 이를 비교하여 고객만족을 높일 수 있는 방안을 제시하는 것이다. 본 연구의 결과, 우선 첫째, 4가지 서비스산업에서 공통적으로 ‘현대적 외관/시설’이 모두 매력적 품질로 분류되었으며 고객만족계수 역시 모두 높게 나타났다. 이는 서비스산업에서 유형성 측면이 고객들의 서비스 품질 평가기준에서 매우 높은 중요도를 갖고 있다는 것으로 해석할 수 있다. 둘째, 수리서비스를 제외한 3가지 서비스산업에서는 고객의 입장을 이해하고 이를 해결하고자 하는 유연성을 갖는 공감성 측면의 개선으로 인하여 고객만족도를 향상 시킬 수 있다는 것을 시사하고 있다. 셋째, 이 4가지 서비스산업에서 공통적인 부분은 모두 공감성 측면에 대하여 매력적 품질속성으로 분류가 되었지만 현재의 만족도는 고객의 기대수준에 미치지 못하였기에 본 공감성 측면에 대한 개선이 우선적으로 이루어져야 한다는 것을 확인할 수 있었다.

This study based on dual aspects of service quality aims at classifying service quality attributes by Kano model and also providing the necessity to decide which service quality would be carried out preferentially in the service industries(hotel service, repair service, education service, medical service). The first purpose of this study, therefore, is assorting the service quality by the Kano model about four service industries based on Schmenner’s service process matrix. Secondly, this has an intention of drawing preferred considerations and putting forward measures to increase the customer satisfaction by Timko and PCSI Index. The result of this study is as follows. First of all, it was found that tangible attributes classified the attractive quality and Timko’s score also was very high in four service industry. That is to say that tangible attributes in service industries could be interpreted into having very high importance at standards on service quality estimation of customer. Second, all but repair service of the service industries suggested empathy dimension to have flexibility solving and understanding the customer’s problem could be improve the customer satisfaction. Finally, the common result between them was empathy dimension classified attractive quality in all industries. That is because present satisfaction was not reached customer expectation so there would be a improvement of empathy dimension preferentially.

This research addresses the comparison of customer satisfaction factors on Service Process Matrix. Service can be classified into 4 categories on Service Process Matrix such as service factory, service shop, mass service and professional service. We assume that the importance of customer satisfaction factors is different by categories of service. We use KS-SQI determinants as the factors of customer satisfaction. Consequently, it is founded that reliability is the most important factor of customer satisfaction in service factory. Also sufficiency of basic wants is the most important factor in service shop. In mass service, however, physical environment is the most critical factor.