Earticle

The purpose of this study was to set and analyze the standard model for prioritizing and deciding to take part in housing environment improvement project in the perspective of the public sector. The results of this study were as follows. The location competitiveness, potential demand, marketability and competitive price, etc were selected by assessment indicators. And Various indicators, including of the size of the area, public transportation, accessibility, convenience of living and the influx of the population, were used by weights indexes. The profit of local residents and the public promoter, variability of earnings, sensitivity analysis and the ratio of money in reserve, etc were also established as detailed indexes for the profitability and business risk analysis. To analyze the cash flow of the project process and review the necessary capital in advance, the payback, total working expenses, gearing ratio and sensitivity of a risk, etc were also set as additional detailed indexes. Lastly, considering it is quasi-public projects, the measure to protect tenants, necessity need of redevelopment and local government's will were additionally used by indexes. And Points were distributed on the importance of each index and scored out of 100. It will allow for the public project promoter to decide rationally whether to come in on the project. The public project promoter like the Korea Land and Housing Corporation will be able to make use of various indexes are based on this study to make decision whether joining the housing environment improvement project in depressed region.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the status of improvement project of residential environment implemented in Jinju City to approach to the methodology of positive and continuous improvement for residential environment. The major contents of the “Special Measure Act for the Improvement for Residential Environment of Urban Low Income Residents” that was enacted in 1989 modified and applied the pertinent laws and regulations on construction related to temporary housing environment to improve the obsolete residential environment by stimulate the participation of local residents. Since the outcome of these projects was not managed in various methods, it committed the error in assessing the environment improvement only by physical project outcome, such as road opening, construction improvement and others. Therefore, this study analyzes the outcome of the improvement project for residential environment implemented in Jinju City in the aspects of physical environment and residents with its strengths and weaknesses, and formulates the improvements through the inquiry of residents and specialists to facilitate as the guideline of improvement project in the future.

In this paper, it was studied and analyzed how the project for improvement of rural housing environment has filled the resident's requirements relative to characteristics of a rural environment, temporal and social requirements and so on. The project for improvement of rural housing environment has been executed in a few way : the rural housing environment, the development of territories for settlement, the development of a desolate region, composition of villages. To analyze and assess the accomplishments, it was considered codes and process relative to the project for improvement of rural housing environment and was analyzed present conditions and problems, through many reference books and administrative datas. 126 of residents in Chongwon county were carried out for researchs with questionaires. This study includes basic life conditions, status for improvement of rural housing environment, degrees of resident's satisfactions and so on.

The core housing-based residential environment improvement project(CHREIP) has been recognized as an alternative method for residential redevelopment since its adoption in 2006. It is a kind of rehabilitation project for low-income residents not just to execute ‘ scrap and built’-typed residential redevelopment. It cover such concepts as self-help housing,affordable housing and social regeneration. The process of the project is developing core-housing(mainly used as rent-house for native residents)district and the district infrastructure first, and building self-help housing later. Even though CHREIP has progressive concept and purpose, 12 districts of model project on a nationwide scale in Korea have not substantially been implemented until 2011. One reason could be partially ascribed to weakness of project implementation system, and the other ones are rigidity of project method and excessive focus on physical rebuilding of old housing. Especially,the contents and process of CHREIP do not reflect social properties of the residents and their needs. To overcome these shortcomings of CHREIP, this study analyzes needs of the residents for CHREIP and suggests improvements for integrating physical betterment of old housing with socio-economic programs on the basis of residents needs.

본 연구의 목적은 주거환경개선사업지구와 주택재개발사업지구 내 거주자들의 주거환경 만족도및 영향요인을 비교･분석하는 것이다. 정비사업의 사후평가 차원에서 대전광역시에 위치한 주거환경개선사업지구와 주택재개발사업지구 거주자를 설문조사하여 그 특성을 비교･분석하였다. 연구를통해 도출된 주요 내용을 요약하면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 주택재개발사업지구내 거주자의 주거환경만족도가 주거환경개선사업지구 거주자에 비해 높은 것으로 나타났으며, 상대적으로 주택재개발사업은 단지 내부적 요인 그리고 주거환경개선사업은 외부적 요인의 개선이 필요함을 인지할 수 있다. 둘째, 주거환경개선사업지구내 거주자의 주거환경 종합만족도는 물리적 환경에 대한 만족도와연관이 높은 반면, 주택재개발사업지구에서는 경제적 환경이나 근린의식과 연관이 높은 것으로나타났다. 세부항목간 상관관계 특성을 효과적으로 활용한다면 정비사업 유형별 거주자들의 주거환경 종합만족도를 보다 효과적으로 높이는 전략으로 연결할 수 있을 것이다. 마지막으로, 주거환경 종합만족도에 영향을 주는 공통요인은 경제적 환경에 대한 만족도로 파악되었다. 경제적 요인외에 주거환경개선사업지구에서는 ‘현재 단지에 대한 인식･이미지’ 항목의 만족도가, 주택재개발사업지구에서는 ‘단지의 청소 및 관리상태’와 ‘단지 주변 치안･방범’ 항목 등의 만족도가 주요 영향요인으로 도출되었다. 본 연구는 실제 정비사업지구 내 거주자 대상의 설문조사에 기초한 실증분석이라는 점에서 의미가 있다. 특히 정비사업 유형인 주거환경개선사업지구와 주택재개발사업지구를 비교･분석하였다는 점에서 기존 연구와 차별성이 있다. 또한, 주거환경 종합만족도와 세부항목 간의 만족도 연관관계 및 영향요인에 있어서 정비사업 유형별로 차이가 있었다는 점은 연구를통해 도출된 중요한 성과라고 할 수 있다. 본 연구에서 다루지 못한 다양한 관점의 연구를 진행하고, 이를 주거환경 개선전략과 연계한다면 사업유형별로 보다 효과적인 주거환경 개선을 도모할 수 있을 것이다

The purpose of this study is to compare the residential environment satisfaction and todeduce the factors of dwelling satisfaction in RIPD(Residential Improvement ProjectDistrict) and HRPD(Housing Redevelopment Project District) in Daejeon Metropolitan Area. This study conducted surveys of 120 inhabitants in RIPD and 70 in HRPD to achieve ourgoals and the results are follows. Firstly, the residential environment satisfaction in RIPDwas higher than that in HRPD. Secondly, the total residential environment satisfaction inRIPD was highly associated with the physical environment satisfaction. but the financialcondition and neighborhood environment are more important in HRPD. Lastly, the commonfactor affecting to the total residential environment satisfaction in the both districts is thefinancial condition. And the satisfaction of impression about the current district is anothermain factor influencing to the total residential environment satisfaction in RIPD. Meanwhile,the satisfactions of management and cleaning condition and of security and crime preventionare crucial in HRPD. This study is significant as an actual proof analysis based on the surveywith residents in the current urban redevelopment districts. The comparison analysis methodof the total residential environment satisfaction in RIPD and HRPD is especially worthy ofnotice. Also one of the important results from this study is the differentiation of theresidential environment satisfaction by urban redevelopment project types. If further researchwith various viewpoints and methods would be carried out, it will be helpful for theresidential environment improvement.