Earticle

초록 close 본 연구는 현재 기초과학연구와 관련된 연구 및 업무를 수행하고 있는 집단을 대상으로 기초과학연구 성과평가지표의 적합성 및 평가지표 분야별 영향력에 대한 실증분석을 실시한 바, 과학적 성과, 기술적 성과, 사회적 성과, 경제적 성과, 인프라 성과 등 5대 성과 모두가 전반적으로 기초과학연구 성과를 평가함에 있어 영향을 미치고 있는 것으로 나타났으며, 이중 경제적 성과는 부정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 그러나 경제적 성과는 과거부터 우리나라에서 시행해 온 평가시스템에서 주요 연구개발 성과물로서 인식되고 있는 기술료, 사업화, 경제적 수익 창출 등을 평가지표로 선정하고 적용하였던 관행을 고려할 때, 기초과학연구 성과를 평가함에 있어 완전히 배제할 수 있는 성과분야는 아니라고 판단된다. 다만, 연구착수 초·중기에는 타 성과분야에 비해서는 평가비중을 낮은 수준으로 조정할 필요가 있다.

This study was conducted to evaluate the empirical analysis of the suitability of performance indicator and impact of the current sectoral indicator for the targeting group that conducts research and work related to the current basic scientific research. The results showed that five indicators such as scientific achievements, technical performance, social performance, economic performance, and infra performance affects the basic scientific research. However, economic performance has been analyzed as an adversely affects. On the other hand, economic performance was traditionally implemented evaluation system in our country and has been recognized as a major research and development achievements. Therefore, it was determined not to have performance areas that can be totally excluded in assessing the basic scientific research. However, a research undertaken early and mid-term stages, it is necessary to adjust the ratio at a low level compared to other performance areas. Economic performance need to have relatively lower weight than the other four indicators in the evaluation of the early and mid term stages of research

우리나라 개인 기초연구사업은 연구역량단계별로 운영되고 있다. 그러나 학문분야별 차별화된 프로그램의 운영이나 학문분야별 특성을 고려한 연구비 배분에 대한 수요가 높다. 또한 기존 수월성 위주의 기초연구지원사업 틀로는 다양성과 창의성을 골자로 하는 연구자주도형 기초연구 확대에 걸림돌로 작용할 수 있다. 이에 본 연구는 기초연구의 다양성 확보를 위한 투자시스템 전환에 관한 논의의 시발점을 제공하기 위해, 논문의 질적 성과지표를 활용하여 연구역량단계별, 학문분야별 연구 성과를 분석한 후 기존 기초연구사업의 운영방향에 대해 제언을 하고자 한다. 분석 결과 개인 기초연구사업의 경우 연구역량단계가 높을수록 연구의 질적 수준이 높게 나타났다. 또한 카이제곱 검정을 통해 살펴본 결과 학문분야별로 연구 성과에 차이가 나는 것으로 분석되었다. 연구결과를 토대로 본 연구는 연구역량단계별로 운영하는 개인 기초연구사업의 운영체제에 취약 기초과학을 선배정후 학문분야별 선정률에 차이를 두는 방안을 제안한다.

In Korea, there is a high demand for the operation of differentiated programs in basic research considering the characteristics of academic fields. The results of this study shows that the higher the level of research competence, the higher the quality of research outputs. The results also tell us that the quality level of the research outputs is different according to the field of study. Based on the results, we propose a method to differentiate the selection rate of each discipline in the system that operates the individual basic research projects by the level of research capacity.

본 연구는 간호학생들의 간호학과 입학 전 과학과목학습과 기초간호과학 및 학업적응을 알아보기 위한 서술적 조사연구로 수집된 자료는 SPSS 19.0으로 분석하였다. 입학 전 과학과목학습은 부분적으로 기초간호과학성적에 차이를 가져왔고, 입학 전, 생물Ⅰ, 화학Ⅰ, 물리Ⅰ, 지구과학Ⅰ 학습은 기초간호과학평균점수를 높였다(p<.05). 입학 전 과학과목학습과 학업적응 간에는 물리Ⅰ을 제외하고는 상관관계가 없었으나, 기초간호과학성적과 학업적응 간에는 양의 상관관계가 있었고(r=0.296, p<.001), 입학 전 과학과목학습은 기초간호과학 성적에, 기초간호과학 성적은 학업적응에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타나(p=.001) 추후 반복연구 후 신입생 학업지도에 응용할 수 있다.

This study is a descriptive survey on the studying science subjects before entrance to nursing department, the scores of basic nursing sciences and the academic adjustment. The data were analyzed using SPSS 19.0. There was a significant difference between studying certain science subjects before entrance and the scores of basic nursing sciences, studying BiologyⅠ, ChemistryⅠ, PhysicsⅠ and Earth scienceⅠ increased mean score of basic nursing sciences(p<.05), there were positive correlations among them. And there was no correlation between studying science subjects before entrance and academic adjustment except PhysicsⅠ, but, there was a positive correlation between score of basic nursing sciences and academic adjustment(r=0.296, p<.001). Also, studying science subjects before entrance affected partially to the scores of basic nursing sciences, and the scores of basic nursing sciences affected academic adjustment(p=.001). This result can be used in pre-school program for the freshmen after repeated study.

This research, as a preliminary study to compile Korean Education Dictionary, has a purpose to build a system of the dictionary in a methodic and a professional way. The main goal of Korean Education Dictionary is to establish academic identity of Korean language education and to arrange and interpret terminologies from a Korean educational viewpoint. Implementation of such purpose should be achieved through specializing contents of Korean language education according to the subject and its systematic description. From this point of view, one needs to separate microstructure and macrostructure apart to study about the system of Korean Education Dictionary. In this paper, the researchers focus on macrostructure and continue in this direction. For this matter, this paper points out that study of macrostructure should be conducted by followings. One needs to do basic documentary research to select headwords of the dictionary at first. Second, based on the carefully selected primary headwords, fundamental practices committee and groups of experts extracts the headwords. Third, one then decides how to present the selected headwords. This research points out that the study of subject specialization should be conducted through frequency of basic documentary research. (Seoul National University)

This research is a pioneering work about assignment that is carried out as Korean studies project. The result of this study will combine the personality of Korean studies and social science into a special form. According to the recent tendency of Korean language study the technical terms needed for teachers and investigator making clear scientific study. Based on the personality of this science and established sphere of lemma in poly science, researchers called this Korean Studies. Researchers marked both morphological and methodological sides of the dictionary and descriptive mode of lemma before considering categories at the theoretical level and practical stratigraphy in the microstructure of this encyclopedia. It also include minor domains such as authentic information and usage. Specifically, when writers describe standard language, they have to arrange relevant entry words according to political necessity and as an authentic teaching method. In the case of foreigners learning Korean language as an educational object, it is considered in public language section. Korean language educational science has system which is included the wide scope from educational policy, course of instruction, teaching material, teaching method, assessment to the relevant basis studies. Just use educational basis and refer it as the inner circle and the outer circle as educational policy and so on. Inner depth is detected as proceeding to seeking the center. Investigators find core section(lexeme) if they enter deeply in each domain. This encyclopedia is constructed through these process. Researchers referred to foreign language education dictionaries and analyzed those structure. Entry word category is deeply examined in the basis study when researchers think about how to describe a lemma. Because this encyclopedia is suited for environment of users, the final will be developed to electronic dictionary as well as paper dictionary. In conclusion, researchers found that microstructure of this encyclopedia make clear scientific results or point at issue. Hereafter, there is remained of dividing off description methods at layers of lemma and finding description typology in entry word category. (Seoul National University)

Government-sponsored Research Institutes(GRIs) have made a great contribution to the development of Korea's Science and Technology(S&T). However, recently GRIs are facing the challenge of many problems. For instance, absence of reasonable strategies, insufficient resources and so on. Therefore, many GRIs are being asked for solving their problems with successful strategic management. This paper suggests a strategic management model to solve their problems and to cope with the changing S&T environment. In this paper, The strategic management model for GRIs which was thoroughly considered strategic management process suggested to response the need of their change and to perform their strategic management successfully. As a case of GRIs to apply this model, in this paper, Korea Basic Science Institute(KBSI) that is part of the Korea Research Council of Fundamental Science and Technology(KRCF) was analyzed. As a result of analysis with this model which applied to KBSI, various strategies and alternatives were suggested.

The Basic Science Research Promotion Act, enacted in 1989, is evaluated as the first legal device used to support basic science research in Korea. Before the law was enacted, basic scientists and the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) had to go through a period of mediation over the definitions of basic science and the targets of support. This paper seeks to reveal the meaning and dynamics contained by this law by tracing the demands of the basic scientists and the developments of related policies, and analyzing the actual process of enacting the bill. I would like to make the following arguments: First, the 1987 democratization movement was behind MOST’s change of its policy to establish the Basic Science Research Institute to build a basic science support research center. Second, the enactment of the Basic Science Research Promotion Act is a result of more reflection on the MOST’s plan, which expanded the scope of basic research and emphasized its connection with industrial developments. Third, the rhetoric of basic scientists who set the ultimate goal of basic science as industrial technology development forced themselves to follow MOST’s intentions in the legislation process.

최근 복잡한 사회문제 해결과 대학 연구소의 기초과학 역량 제고를 위한 학제 간 협력연구의 중요성이 부각되면서, 공동연구 활성화를 위한 정책적 노력들이 확산되고 있다. 본 연구는G-램프(Global-Learning & Academic research institution for Master’s･PhD students, and Postdocs)사업을 중심으로 대학 기초과학 연구소의 학제 간 지식 연계 구조를 분석하여, 정책이 의도한대학 주도 공동연구 플랫폼이 어떻게 형성되고 있는가를 탐색하는데 목적이 있다. 연결망 분석을 통해 28개 대학의 44개 학문분야를 분석한 결과, 기초과학 공동연구 협력은 학제 간 유기적 연계가 형성되는 외부 지향적 특성을 갖는 것으로 나타났다. 특히 E-I(External-Internal)Index, SMI(Segregation Matrix Index) 및 컴포넌트(Components) 분석을 통해 기초과학 연구 활동이 전문화된 개방성에 따라 다층적 측면에서 공동연구 플랫폼을 구축하고 있음을 확인하였다. 본 연구는 연결망 분석 결과를 바탕으로, 향후 학제 간 협력에 대한 체계적이고 지속가능한 대응과 전략적 기초연구 지원 방안에 대한 정책적 시사점을 제시한다.

Interdisciplinary research has become increasingly critical for addressing complex societalchallenges and strengthening the basic science capacity of university research institutes,which has prompted expanded policy initiatives to foster research collaboration. This studyexplores the formation of university-led collaborative research platforms by analyzinginterdisciplinary knowledge linkage structures within university basic science researchinstitutes, with a focus on the G-LAMP program. Network analysis of 44 academic disciplinesacross 28 universities reveals that collaborative research in basic sciences demonstratesexternally-oriented patterns characterized by cohesive cross-disciplinary linkages. The E-IIndex, SMI, and component analysis further indicate that basic science convergence researchactivities establish multi-level collaborative platforms reflecting varying degrees ofspecialized openness. These findings offer policy implications for developing systematic andsustainable approaches to interdisciplinary collaboration and implementing strategic supportmechanisms for basic research.

이 연구는 이명박 정부의 기초과학연구원(IBS) 설립과 문재인 정부의 기초연구사업예산 2배 증액 사례를 비교 분석함으로써 과학정책 의제설정 과정의 특징과 정책 대상이면서 동시에 정책형성 행위자인 과학자의 역할을 조명한다. 기초과학연구원 설립 의제는 과학자들이 중심이 된 ‘은하도시포럼’에서 처음 제시되었고, 사업의 초기 구상을 소수의 과학자가 주도하였다는 점에서 내부접근형 의제설정모형에 해당한다. 한편, 연구자 주도 기초연구예산을 확대하자는 의제는 과학자 다수가 생물학연구정보센터(BRIC) 홈페이지와 국회청원을 통해 이슈를 확산시켰고, 그 내용이 유력 대선후보의 공약과 이후 국정과제에 반영되었다는 점에서 외부주도형과 동원형이 혼합된 의제설정모형에 해당한다. 하지만 두 사례 모두 과학자들이 주도적으로 제시한 초기 의제의 내용과 정책형성과정에서 정부가 제시한 공식의제의 내용이 달라졌다. 이는 과학정책의 의제의 직접적인 편익을 계산하기 어렵고 정책형성 과정에서 대중의 관심과 지지를 얻기에도 쉽지 않아 대통령과 정부의 의지가 중요하게 작용한 것으로 풀이된다. 이 연구는 두 과학정책 사례에서 의제설정의 양상을 비교하였으며, 관찰된 차이가 편익의 집중과 분산에 대한 인식의 차이에 기인했다고 보았다. 특히, 두 사례에 대한 비교분석을 통해 다른 이익집단과 달리 인지적 권위를 이용해 의제설정 과정을 주도하는 과학자집단의 전략적 행태에 주목하였으며, 이슈의 발전단계에 따라 의제를 주도하는 행위자들과 의제설정 방식이 달라지는 과학정책의 특성을 확인하였다는 점에 의의가 있다.

This study analyzes the establishment of the Institute of Basic Science (IBS) under the Lee Myung-bak administration and the doubling of the budget for basic research projects under the Moon Jae-in administration to shed light on the characteristics of the science policy agenda-setting process and the role of scientists as both policy targets and policy-shaping actors. The agenda of establishing a basic science institute was first presented at ‘the Galactic City Forum’, which is centered on scientists, and the initial conception of the project was led by a small group of scientists, which fits the internal assess model. On the other hand, the agenda to expand the basic research budget, which was led by researchers, is a mixed agenda-setting model of external initiative and mobilization in that many scientists spread the issue through the BRIC website and a petition to the National Assembly, and the contents were reflected in the pledges of the leading presidential candidates and subsequent national issues. However, in both cases, the content of the initial agenda proposed by the scientists differed from the official agenda proposed by the government in the policy formation process. The agenda of science policy is highly specialized and difficult to calculate direct benefits, and it is difficult to gain public attention and support in the policy formation process, which explains the importance of the will of the president and the government. This study suggested that the observed differences were due to differences in perceptions of the concentration and dispersion of benefits. In particular, the comparative analysis of the two cases shows the strategic behavior of a group of scientists who use their cognitive authority to drive the agenda-setting process, and identifies the characteristics of science policy in which the actors and agenda-setting methods change depending on the stage of development of the issue.

본 연구의 목적은 국내 기초과학 관련 전문가들의 인식을 토대로 노벨과학상 수준의 연구 성과를 달성하기 위한 현실적인 방안을 구체적으로 탐색하는데 있다. 연구를 위해 관련 선행연구를 조사하였고 자료 수집 대상은 신문 기사, 도서 등이었다. ‘노벨상’이라는 키워드로 최신의 정보 및 동향을 파악하고자 2015년 10월 1일∼2017년 7월 11일까지의 기간을 대상으로 총 20,000여건의 신문기사를 기본적으로 확인하였다. 그 외 연구의 주제와 직접적으로 관련된 최신 기사와 도서를 추가적으로 반영하였다. 다음으로, 자료 처리 및 분석 과정에서 수집된 자료를 검토, 선별해 나갔다. 코딩 작업과 카테고리 분류 및 명명을 한 후 자료를 반복적으로 검토, 수정하여 최종 확정하였다. 연구 결과에서는 ‘노벨과학상’ 수준의 연구 수행을 위한 방안으로 ‘노벨상에 대한 관점의 변화’, ‘연구의 방향 및 방식의 변화’, ‘지원 및 평가 체제의 변화’, ‘교육 및 풍토의 변화’가 도출되었다. 본 연구를 통해 노벨과학상 수준의 연구 수행을 위해 필요한 개선 사항들을 구체적으로 확인할 수 있을 것이다. 연구의 결과를 바탕으로 논의 및 결론, 향후 연구에 대한 제언을 제시하였다.

The purpose of this study is to explore practical ways for research achievement at the level of Nobel Prize in Science based on the recognition of domestic experts in basic science. For the study, related research was investigated and data collection was done through newspaper articles, books, etc. In order to identify the latest information and trends with the keyword ‘Nobel Prize’, a total of 20,000 newspaper articles were basically confirmed for the period from October 1, 2015 to July 11, 2017. In addition, I added one recent article and one book directly related to the subject of this study. Next, the collected data were reviewed and selected during data processing and analysis. After coding and category classification and naming, the data were repeatedly reviewed and revised and finally confirmed. The results of this study were derived from ‘Changes in perspective on the Nobel Prize’, ‘Changes in direction and method of research’, ‘Changes in support and evaluation system’, ‘Changes in education and climate’. This study will provide improvements for conducting research at the level of Nobel Prize in Science. Based on the results of the study, the discussion, the conclusion, and suggestions for future research are presented.

1950년대부터 선진국을 중심으로 세계 도처에서 기술혁신과 사업화를 위한 수단으로서 과학 단지가 조성되기 시작하였다. 우리나라 역시 1980년대 이후 기술혁신을 위한 R&D의 양적 투자 확대를 시작으로 지금까지 지속적인 노력의 결과, 특허 창출 수준은 이미 세계 10위권 이내에 위치한다. 하지만 국내 기술무역수지 등을 통해 나타나는 현재의 기술경쟁력 수준은 선진국에 비해 매우 미흡한 현실이다. 이는 곧 투입된 재원에 비해 경제적 가치 창출이 저조하다는 것을 의미하며 기술을 통해 경제적 가치를 확보하기 위한 방안이 요구되고 있다. 현재 우리나라 전국에 걸쳐 설치된 10개의 과학연구단지는 지역의 산업고도화와 지역경제의 성공적인 활성화를 위한 R&D 수행에 어려움을 겪고 있다. 이에 따라 본 연구에서는 유사하지만 차이점이 있는 '과학 단지'의 개념을 정리하고, 지역혁신체제(RIS)의 이론을 토대로 각기 유사한 기능을 수행하고 있는 기관 및 단지를 비교 분석하여 각자에 부합 또는 적합한 임무 구분을 시도한다. 또한 이를 통해 우리나라 혁신시스템의 약점을 보완하고 관련된 각 기관의 역량 극대화와 동시에 시장 선도를 가능하게 하는 기초원천 기술을 효과적으로 활용할 수 있는 방안을 도출하고자 한다.

From the 1950s, the science parks were begun the composition as a way for innovation and commercialization in the world around developed countries. Since the 1980s, Korea also starting with quantitative investment in R & D for technology innovation, so far has been a continuous effort. Korea's patent creation level according to these R & D investment is already within the world's top 10, but the fact that the domestic technology trade balance appearing current competitive level compared to the developed technology is very insufficient. This means that the creation of economic value is low as compared with financial commitment. Therefore the plans to ensure the economic value through technology are required. As one of plans to do this for local economy activation through technical advances, constructing regional innovation systems and making science parks have been made. These science parks are required to develop the basic original technology in order to secure new growth engines, but the science parks in Korea are facing difficulties of performing research and development for regional industry advancement and local economy activation. Accordingly, this study attempts to organize the concept of 'science park' is similar but there is difference, and to compare institutions with similar functions based on regional innovation systems theory. In addition, the study is to obtain the application plans of basic original technology in science & research Parks through the model for overcoming weaknesses of Korea's innovation system and enabling organic cross-linking between institutions.

This research was conducted to make suggestions for the promotion of research activities in the field of animal resources sciences, and we evaluated the research funding trend and the present status of research funding offered by KOSEF in this field. Comparative portion of the number of research projects and grants in this field to other fields has a tendency to be decreased year by year except recent few years. Researchers in this field have received more research funding from the group-based program than from the individual-based program. Also, they have received less money(per project) than did researchers in the fields of general agricultural sciences and other science and technology. Researchers in this field ranges from 43 to 51 years of age and showed 48 years of average age. It was found that researchers who has been funded in the field of animal resources sciences have showed tendency of publication of more articles to SCI journals in recent 5 years. The strong points of the animal resources of agricultural sciences field in South Korea include: lots of researchers, the establishment of research infra-structure, the excellence in research competitiveness and technology level. However, its weaknesses are: a lack of leadership in relevant societies and institutes, a predicted shortfall of researchers in the next generation and insufficient research productivity. The opportunities include: increasing the importance of the biotechnology industry, activating international cooperation researches and exploring the multitude of possible research areas to be studied. However, some concerns still exist, such as threats from developed countries for the government to open the agricultural market, the reduction of the number of full-time farms and intensification of needs for economic and social effects. The diverse actions and systems based upon the strongpoint, weakness, opportunity and threats above-mentioned are required to encourage research activities in the field of animal resources of agricultural sciences in Korea In addition, researchers in this fields would make an effort to keep pace with international society as well as domestic demands.

The Korea Science and Engineering Foundation (KOSEF) was established in 1977 to promote universities and encourage basic research. This article focuses on the projects of KOSEF and the discourse surrounding the concept of “basic research.” Observing the changing concept of “basic research” and the role of universities in the 1970s and 1980s will allow one to understand the perspective of the Korean government, especially the Ministry of Science and Technology(MOST). This paper will show that the Korean government’s plan to integrate higher education institutions in the process of national development was inextricably linked to its notion of “basic research.” Through this process, South Korean universities were able to play significant roles as research institutes after the 1990s. During the 1980s, the concept of “basic research” was expanded to include areas of applied science and engineering, and the Korean government wanted the universities to take part in national development by conducting research in these areas. The “mission-oriented basic research project” became the largest project within KOSEF after the mid-1980s in order to actively engage universities in those areas of research.

이 연구의 목적은 개정 특수학교 기본교육과정에 의거하여 2008년 개발된 특수학교 기본교육과정 과학과 교과서에 대한 현장 특수학교 교사들의 만족도와 관련 요구를 분석함으로써 특수학교 과학과 교과서의 질적 평가 및 개선방안을 모색하는 것이다. 이를 위해 전국 11개 특수학교에 재직 중인 98명의 특수교사를 대상으로 과학과 교과서 만족도 및 요구에 대한 설문을 실시하였다. 설문결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 전반적인 구성 측면에서는 단원별, 수준별, 교과간의 연계성 및 계열성을 비롯한 적절성, 삽화․사진 구성 등이 매우 양호한 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 내용 측면에서 학습자의 참여 유도를 비롯한 학습자의 특성 반영, 단계별 에너지, 물질, 생명, 지구 내용이 적절하게 구성된 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 삽화･사진 및 활동자료 구성 측면에서 적절하게 구성된 것으로 나타났다. 넷째, 교과서 활용 및 보급 측면에서 활용 비중을 높이기 위해서는 학생 능력과 좀 더 일치하는 교과서 개발 방안 모색이 필요하며, 개인별 교과서 보급 근거 마련이 시급한 것으로 나타났다. 다섯째, 개선방향 측면에서는 현행 Ⅲ단계 체제로 구성된 교과서의 체제 개선뿐만 아니라 부족한 교과서 내용의 보충을 위한 보완교과서 개발이 필요한 것으로 나타났다.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the satisfaction and needs of special school teachers on the social studies textbooks which developed on 2008 according to the new special education course and to execute the qualitative evaluation of them and to develop the improvement plan. To accomplish this research, we practice the questionaries about the satisfaction of science studies textbooks to 98 special school teachers who work in the special schools in all different region. The result of survey is as following. First of all, the general organization such as the chapter, the level, the connection between curriculum is very good. Second, as in the contents, it contains energy, matter, life, the earth and even it reflects the individual qualities to make them to participate, so it was good. Third, the illustration, the picture, and the activity materials in the text book was well-arranged. Forth, an aspect of the application and popularities, it needed to be more adjusted with the student abilities, and a supplying individual text book preparation is a urgent matter. Fifth, an aspect of improvement, existing textbooks which organized with 3 levels needed to be organized with 7 levels and developing supplement textbooks are suggested.

본 연구에서는 2011 특수교육 기본 교육과정 초등과학 내용 성취기준의 적합성을 알아보고자, 기본 교육과정 운영 특수학교에서 초등과학 교과를 담당하는 특수교사를 대상으로 설문 조사를 실시하였다. 특히 교사가 인식하는 담당학생의 학습수준을 상중하 3가지로 분류하여 수준별로 조사하였으며, 더불어 학년군별 및 과학 영역별 적합성을 조사하였다. 그 결과 첫째, 학년군 및 학생수준별 과학 내용 성취기준 적합성에 대한 교사의 인식에 따르면, 학년군이 높을수록, 나아가 학생 수준이 낮을수록 적합성이 떨어짐을 알 수 있었다. 둘째, 과학의 4가지 영역(물질, 에너지, 생명, 지구)과 관련하여 내용 성취기준 적합성은 학생 수준이 낮아질수록, 나아가 학년군이 높아질수록 떨어졌고, 동일학년군, 동일수준 학생에게 있어서도 과학영역별 적합성에 대한 교사의 인식이 서로 상이했다. 이에 근거하여 기본교육과정 적용 학생들이 고학년이 된다고 해도 교과내용이 공통교육과정의 수준과 비례하여 어려워지면 곤란하고, 동일학년 내에서도 수준 차이가 크므로 내용성취기준 설정에서 이를 제대로 반영해야 한다는 해석이 가능했다. 나아가 이러한 현장 인식에 따라 기본 교육과정‘학년군별 성취기준’개념에 대한 학계의 교과교육학적 논의가 요청되며, 과학 영역별 성취기준 차등 분배, 중도중복장애 학생 학습 수준에 중점을 두는 성취기준 개발 필요성 등을 논의하였다.

This research was performed to learn about an appropriate learning standards and science education in the basic curriculum of special education in 2011. In order to conduct the survey, the professional teachers who are responsible for the science curriculum about intellectual and developmental disabilities from special elementary school participated in. The grades in this survey consisted of three categories (high, medium and low) depending on the difference of students' scholastic aptitude. These categories emphasized focus in the appropriateness for the achievement standards of science subjects. The results of the study demonstrates that the standards of accomplishment for current science subjects were not suitable for the students of below middle level. The majority of this group consisted of the students who had received a basic curriculum of special schools. This made it difficult for students to study energy, bio, and earth science as students got older. In addition, the achievement standards of elementary science in basic curriculum of special school should be reduced. Furthermore, the research needed to be conducted, and required continuous expertise to develop unique lecturing characteristics and created a professional approach manual for the general education curriculum.