Earticle

「BPMS」is primarily concerned with the automation of the business processes. It assumes that everything is under normal operation and can be processed according to the predefined norms and standards. However, exception means a situation where things cannot be processed according to the predefined standard norms and procedures. In this regard, it seems nonsensical to apply 「BPMS」 for exception handling. This paper attempts to break this preconception, and to show that it is a viable approach to apply 「BPMS」 for exception handling, especially in the defense industry. In order to realize this scheme, we developed a system architecture which encompasses the design of a process repository, a process dictionary, a knowledge management system, and a fBPMSJ application software. In the proposed architecture, a process repository is used for the storage of the business processes developed for exception handling, a process dictionary is required to describe the various situation variables and decision variables related to the exception handling. 「BPMS」 is also essential for storage, retrieval, and utilization of the various business processes stored in the process repository.

In this paper, it is an object of the present invention that it is looking for a problem that word ‘prefix + suffix’ form has from the synchronic point of view, to confirm the formation process of a word diachronic point of view. And I want to see whether reasonable what to handle the lexical form of the word ‘suffix +prefix’ form based on this. For example, words that Korean <Oe-dung-i> is, in synchronic perspective, prefix <Oe-> can be analyzed that <-dung-i> is bound and the suffix. However, from the point of view of word formation, roots <Oe-> and the suffix <-dung-i> seems to have formed by a combination. In other words, in synchronic perspective, it appears to structure ‘suffix’ is bound to ‘prefix’, but in the formation of the word, a combination of ‘suffix’ and ‘root’ actually. On the other hand, most of the existing dictionary words were analyzed in terms of synchronic. Then, in the morphological information in the microstructure, it provides the information. For this reason, I propose to provide morphology information from the analysis of synchronic of words. And also the formation process of the word, it is proposed to provide information in etymology. I believe that it may be used as such a method, to provide accurate information theoretic form of the word. ‘Gun-dam, Nae-tteu-ri-da, Mag-chi, Min-jja, Saeng-kkun, Saeng-jja, Oe-dung-i, Jjog-ji,Chal-gi, Pus-nae-gi, Has-nae-gi’ words that are analyzed in this paper, is the word of the total and 11. In Chapter 3, we review the formation process diachronic of this word, in the fourth chapter, to seek a scheme that can be utilized in information etymology of this word dictionary.

Idu Dictionary of Dankook University Academy Of Asian Studies contained the more expanded number of Iduto(吏讀吐)'s headword entries and related examples in terms of quantity, compared to the existing Idu Dictionary(吏讀辭典) and showed developed contents in understanding by incorporating the results of studies on Idu. Thus, this article summarized the scale and process of Idu Dictionary(吏讀辭典) compilation by Dankook University Academy Of Asian Studies and pursued the ways for developing the Idu(吏讀) dictionary in the future. Some directions for improving this dictionary were mentioned in this article for showing how close Idu Dictionary(吏讀辭典) by Dankook University Academy Asian Studies Institute is to the ultimate Idu Dictionary(吏讀辭典). First of all, it is necessary to carefully review literature data on Idu to discover new headword entries of Iduto(吏讀吐). It is also required to supplement their examples which have not been found. Dankook University Academy Of Asian Studies set the criteria of the headword entries which is limited to the range of phrases due to the cost of the compilation work and applied to the Idu Dictionary(吏讀辭典). For an accurate understanding of Iduto(吏讀吐), it is necessary to apply the criteria for setting the headword entries centered on the vocabulary and morphemes forming a phrase. It is also required to explore the features which can define normative examples for Iduto. Since Iduto(吏讀吐)'s grammatical position is a postposition (an affix) or ending (a suffix), it is necessary to analyze the semantic function indicated by Iduto(吏讀吐) and present examples based on the semantic function. Understanding such semantic function of Iduto(吏讀吐) will help figure out the semantic function of the postposition of Korean or ending. Idu(吏讀) literature data is generally a recording of the lives and history of our people. Therefore, presenting modern translations about recorded examples of Idu(吏讀) is necessary to help researchers in other fields to better understand the lives and history of our people.

日本には数多くの国語辞書が存在する。ここでは、現代国語辞書の嚆矢とされる『言海』を始めとし、それ以降に出版された代表的な辞書を中心に研究した。現代の国語辞書はそれぞれ編集方針を掲げ、大きく「語源主義」と「現代語主義」に分けることができる。 本研究では各国語辞書の編纂過程や特徴を考察し、編集及び当時の日本の姿を明らかにしようとした。明治維新後の日本は、近代化を目指し事業の一環として言語統一を行った。諸文書、戸籍書類などにおける表記法は毎年のように変わり、日本全国あるいは東アジアの一部を併合し管理しようとした。国語辞書はこのような近代化の過程で大きな役割を果たし、成長した。そして、現代においても私たちが使う言葉の基準や模倣となっている。

In Japan, there are a lot of dictionaries. In this article, I studied the representative dictionary “Genkai” which is evaluated as the beginning of modern Japanese dictionary. Modern Japanese dictionaries have different compilation policies, and there are ‘ethmology’ and ‘modern languageism’. Dictionaries are compiled based on this standard. In this study, I examinated the history and characteristics of each dictionary, and tried to clarify Japan’s image at the time of compilation and publication. In midst of Japanese modernization after the Meiji Restoration, unify of Japanese Language was started. the notation of each document, family register, and text book was changed every year, and was managed uniformly through out Japan or the ruling countries. The Japanese dictionary plays a big role in the unification and is captained by the modernization of Japan. Until now, the Japanese dictionary exists as the standard of the language that we use.

Korean-Chinese Learner’s Dictionary, which was compiled by the National Institute of Korean Language, is a web dictionary translating Korean Basic Dictionary into Chinese. As more and more Chinese wanted to learn Korean, the National Institute of Korean Language planned for the translation. A research team in Korea University carried out the project for 3 years from 2016 to 2018. The main focus of the project was to present Chinese counterparts with Korean headwords by translating them into Chinese.?This paper aims to provide an overview of the compiling project, Korean-Chinese Learning Dictionary, the principles applied to the actual translation process, and to examine the current status of the Sino-Korean headwords and the detailed translation method. In Chapter 2, the review of the purpose, steps, and progress of Korean-Chinese Learner’s Dictionary is provided. Chapter 3 presents the statistical results of the Sino-Korean headwords in Korean-Chinese Learner’s Dictionary. In addition, the detailed principles applied to the process of Chinese translation are reviewed along with the main cases by the headword type. Moreover, the characteristics of the cultural vocabulary and the band system according to them are discussed.

본고는 게일(James Scarth Gale)의 「元牧師行狀」(1916)에 기술된 언더우드의 이중어사전(1890)이 지닌 당대의 학술사적 의미, 그리고 사전편찬과정에서 발견할 수 있는 한국 근대어의 재편과정을 고찰하였다. 언더우드의 이중어사전은 ‘소형사전’, ‘한영․영한사전’이란 특징을 지녔다. ‘소형사전’이라는 특징은 한국어-영어 사이의 교환관계를 한국의 구어 층위에서 정립될 필요로 인하여 비롯된 것이다. 언더우드 사전의 1부(한영사전)는 「韓佛字典」의 어휘들 중 일상회화 층위의 한국어를 엄선하는 작업이었다. 한국인들과의 구어상황, 임브리의 「英日語原」은 언더우드가 문법서 및 사전을 발행할 한국의 구어층위를 확정시켜 주었고 향후 ‘성서번역’을 위한 한글문어라는 비전을 제시해 주었다. 그의 사전 2부는 존스, 게일로 이어진 영한사전의 시원이다. 이는 한문문어가 제공해준 어휘들과 다른 층위, 서구적 개념어에 대한 역어들이 한글문어에 재편되는 과정을 엿볼 수 있는 자료들이다. 영한이라는 번역적 구도는 문자체계이며 표기법으로 인식되던 諺文을 문학과 학술담론을 구가할 한글문어로 재편할 수 있는 가능성을 보여주었다. 왜냐하면 영한이란 번역적 구도에서 한국어는 과거에는 없던 새로운 한글문어, 서구적 개념을 체현해 낼 번역문을 의미하는 것이었기 때문이다.

국어의 언어 규범을 온전하게 이해하려면 현재의 의미와 당대의 의미를 총체적으로 고려해야 한다. 현재의 언어 규범은 ≪한글 맞춤법(1988)≫을 기준으로 언어 규범의 원리가 규정으로 실현되어 규범 체계가 형성된 이전의 시기와, 세부 항목이 해석되고 적용되어 사전에서 구체화되고 언어 공동체와 소통하면서 보급되는 현재의 시기로 나눌 수 있다. 언어 규범이 정착 단계에 접어든 현재의 언어 환경에서 언어 규범이 급격하게 변화할 가능성은 높지 않다. 현재의 언어 규범은 어문 규정에 기반한 이전과는 달리 인터넷 기반의 국어사전이 언어 소통의 플랫폼으로 자리잡고 있다는 점이 특징이다. 국어사전에서는 언어 규범을 구체화하고 언어 공동체와의 소통이 강화됨으로써 이전의 언어 공동체와의 관계가 쌍방향적이고 상호적인 관계로 변화하였다. 한글 맞춤법이 자리잡고 국어사전으로 언어 규범의 중심이 변화하는 지금까지의 변화 과정을 통해 향후의 언어 규범의 성격과 소통 구조가 어떻게 될지 새로운 관점의 논의가 필요하다고 할 수 있다.

In order to fully understand the linguistic norms of the Korean language, the current meaning and contemporary meaning must be comprehensively considered. The current linguistic norms are based on the ≪Hangeul Orthography (1988)≫, the previous period when the principles of linguistic norms were realized as regulations and a normative system was formed, and detailed items were interpreted and applied, specified in dictionaries, and disseminated through communication with the linguistic community. It can be divided into the current period. In the current language environment where language norms have entered the established stage, it is not likely that language norms will change drastically. Current linguistic norms are characterized by the fact that, unlike before, which were based on linguistic regulations, Internet-based Korean dictionaries have established themselves as a platform for language communication. In the Korean dictionary, language norms were specified and communication with the language community was strengthened, changing the previous relationship with the language community into a two-way and reciprocal relationship. It can be said that there is a need to discuss from a new perspective what the nature of language norms and communication structure will be in the future through the process of change so far, in which the Korean orthography has become established and the center of language norms has changed with Korean dictionaries.

본고는 일석의 일기(1956∼1962) 내용을 중심으로 ≪국어대사전≫(1961) 편찬의 구체적인 과정과 편찬 직후의 사건들을 살펴 보았다. 사전 편찬과 관련된 해당 기간의 일기 기록은 총 72건으로, 1956년과 1957년은 각각 3건, 1958년은 36건, 1959년은 7건, 1960년은 1건, 1961년은 3건, 1962년은 19건의 기록들을 중심으로검토하였다. 기록의 내용을 통해, 연도별로 ≪국어대사전≫(1961) 편찬 과정을정리하면, 1956년에는 사전의 착수와 출판 계약이 있었고, 1957년에는 사전의 범례 재료들이 결정되었다. 또한 1958년에는 외래어, 방언, 고어 처리에 대한 과정이 진행되었고, 1959년에는 고제도 관련 어휘에 대한 작업이 진행되었다. 1960년에는 특별한 내용이 없으나, 1961년에는 출간 직전에 서문의 집필과 사전의 속표지에 대한 선택이 있었다. 출간 후인 1962년에는 새로 편찬된 사전을 친지와 제자들에게 증정한 일들과 출판기념회와 신문사 인터뷰 등의 내용이 있었다. 이러한≪국어대사전≫(1961)은 백과사전식 사전 시대의 정점을 이루었다는 점에서 국어사전 편찬사 측면에서 의의를 가지며, 품사명을 한자어로 일원화했다는 점과, 존재사와 접속사 등을 포함한 10품사 체계를 국어사전에 적용하였다는 점에서국어학사의 측면에서도 의의를 가진다고 할 수 있다.

This paper examines the specific process of compiling ≪The Korean Language Dictionary≫(1961) and the events that followed its completion, focusing on the diary entries of Il-seok (1956?1962). A total of 72 diary entries related to the dictionary compilation during this period were found: 3 entries from 1956, 3 from 1957, 36 from 1958, 7 from 1959, 1 from 1960, 3 from 1961, and 19 from 1962. The analysis centers on these entries. Based on the content of these records, the compilation process of ≪The Korean Language Dictionary≫(1961) by year is outlined as follows: In 1956, the dictionary was initiated, and a publication contract was signed. In 1957, the materials for the dictionary’s explanatory notes were determined. In 1958, the process for handling foreign words, dialects, and archaic words took place. In 1959, work on vocabulary related to old-style orthography was carried out. No significant developments occurred in 1960, but in 1961, just before publication, the preface was written, and decisions regarding the dictionary's title page were made. After its publication in 1962, the dictionary was presented to friends and disciples, and events such as a publication commemorative ceremony and newspaper interviews took place. ≪The Korean Language Dictionary≫(1961) holds significance in the history of Korean dictionary compilation as it marked the peak of the encyclopedia-style dictionary era. It also holds importance in the history of Korean linguistics for standardizing part-of-speech labels using Sino-Korean terms and for applying a ten-part-of-speech system, which includes categories such as existential verbs and conjunctions.