Earticle

1947년 2월 25일 발행된 <문학> “인민항쟁특집”호는 모두 10월항쟁을 다룬 8편의 글만 수록된 매우 독특한 임시호이다. 본고는 이 작품들이 조선문학가동맹의 기관지 안에 수렴된, 특정한시기에 구성된 산물이라는 점을 고려하여, 소설의 개별적 특성과 함께 공통항을 찾아 기획의도를 분석하고자 했다. 이 특집호의 작품들을 분석함으로써 조선문학가동맹이 주목했던 10월항쟁의 원인과 과정, 더 나아가 그들이 추구했던 10월항쟁의 역사화 방향을 살펴볼 수 있다. 특집호 소설들은 우선 10월항쟁이 ‘항쟁’이 되도록 서사를 구축하고 있다. 이때 폭력투쟁이‘항쟁’이 되기 위해서는 사건이 발발할 수밖에 없도록 원인을 제공하고, 선-폭력에 대한 후-정당방위로써 폭력상황에 정당성을 부여하는 작업에 공을 들여야 했다. 또한 ‘인민’ 항쟁이 되도록 주체를 형상화하는데, 특히 작가들은 농민과 노동자 등 ‘인민’을 주인공으로 내세워 주체성을 강조하고, 이들이 투쟁의 과정에서 ‘인민들’로 연대하도록 이끌고 있다. 그리고 이 연대를 통해 깨달음을 얻게 함으로써 ‘항쟁’의 의미를 스스로 체현하도록 했다. 그렇다면 조선문학가동맹은 어째서 좌익 진영의 지도력이나 영향력을 강조하기보다 ‘인민’의 ‘항쟁’으로 기록하고자 했는지 궁금해지는데, 이 문제는 1947년의 국면 속에서 설명되어야한다. 조선문학가동맹은 10월항쟁 이후 국면 타개를 위해 문학운동의 투쟁성을 강화해나가며문화대중화운동에 매진하는데, 10월항쟁의 적극적인 작품 창작은 이러한 방법론의 하나로 해석될 수 있다. 이때 10월항쟁을 통해 투쟁적으로 변화된 대중에게 변혁의 필연성과 정당성을공감하게 하는 데에는 이 사건이 ‘인민’ ‘항쟁’으로 형상화 될 필요가 있었다. 그러나 보다 근본적인 원인은 문학자가 인민대중에 뒤쳐져 있다는 자기반성, 즉 문학자들 스스로 10월항쟁이 ‘인민’의 ‘항쟁’이었음을 목도한 충격과 자극에서 찾아야 할 것이다. 그래서 조선문학가동맹이 지향한 민주주의민족문학을 참으로 ‘인민의 문학’으로 실현시키고자 했을 때 10월항쟁의서사화는 그것의 새로운 시작이 될 수 있었다.

People’s Uprising Special Issue of [Literature] issued on February 25, 1947is a very special temporary issue in which only 8 literary works, which all dealtwith the October Uprising, are contained. This thesis attempted to analyze theintention of planning this issue by finding the common clauses of the novelsalong with their individual characteristics, considering that these literaryworks were the products which were converged in Korean Writers Alliance’organ and which were composed in the particular time period. By analyzing theliterary works contained in this special issue, the causes and process of theOctober Uprising on which Korean Writers Alliance (hereinafter referred to asWriters Alliance) focused and the historicizing direction, which they pursued,of the October Uprising can be examined. The novels in this special issue build the narration of the event so that theOctober Uprising can be “uprising.” For violence fighting to become “uprising,”elaborate efforts had to be made to justify the violent situation by providingcauses for the inevitable outbreak of the event leading to the chain of violenceand self-defense. In embodying the main agent so as to become “people”uprising, the writers emphasize subjectivity by making “people” such as farmersand laborers and induce them to band together with “peoples” in the processof struggle. And through this alliance, the writers made these people obtainenlightenment and realize the meaning of “uprising” by themselves. Then, one wonders why the Writers Alliance wanted to record it as the“uprising “of “people” instead of emphasizing the leadership and influentialpower of the left wing, and this should be explained in the aspect of the year1947. The Writers Alliance, while experiencing October Uprising, highlycriticized the cultural movement which could not sympathize with people andwhich fell far behind in consciousness. Afterwards, to change the situation, they reinforced the belligerence of the literary movement and strived toconcentrate on culture popularization movement and the active creation ofliterary works on the October Uprising can be interpreted as one of thesemethodologies. To make people, who changed to become belligerent throughOctober Uprising,, sympathize with the inevitability and justification of thereform, it was necessary to embody this event as “people” uprising. However,more fundamental causes should be sought from the shock and qualification ofthe literary persons themselves who witnessed that the October Uprising wasthe “uprising” of “people” and from their self-reflection that the literary personswere behind the general public. So the new beginning of making narrative ofthe October Uprising was the time when the Writers Alliance attempted tomaterialize the democratic national literature that they pursued as true“people’s literature.”

The purpose of this study is to investigate the residents' participation behavior which is an important factor of the success of mega-event. As the determinants of residents' participation behavior in mega-event, residents' general characteristics as well as the perception of effects of mega-event were tested in this study. The data for the study were collected from residents in Daegu, which will be held IAAF International Championships in 2011. From the results of the study, two types of participation behavior in Mega-event were classified: participation in preparation process and participation during the event. Regarding resident's general characteristics, resident's interest in athletic sports affect both types of participation behavior in mega-event. The study also reveals that residents' perception of positive economic, social, cultural impacts of the event affect both types of participation behavior. Residents' perception of negative environment impact also affect their participation behavior. The results of the study implies that it is necessary for the residents to perceive the positive effects of mega-event. It helps for residents to participate in the event by themselves which is an importance factors of successful mega-event.

Objective Research on psychological distress from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis has increased significantly, but the factors that can exacerbate or mitigate such distress have remained underexplored. To address the research gap, this study examined whether two types of rumination and perceived social support predict psychological distress during the pandemic.Methods Participants were recruited from communities of the greater Daegu area (n=316) where the first massive outbreak in South Korea occurred and most residents underwent substantial disruption of daily life. They completed self-report questionnaires that included measures of psychological distress, event-related rumination, and social support.Results The hierarchical regression analysis showed that maladaptive intrusive rumination and perceived social support predicted increases and decreases in psychological distress, respectively, even when subjective severity of COVID-19-related experiences was controlled. Putatively adaptive type of rumination (i.e., deliberate rumination) was not a significant predictor concurrently.Conclusion This is among the early endeavors to comprehensively understand risk and protective factors associated with an effective coping strategy against the COVID-19 crisis. Our results indicate that intrusive rumination aggravates but social support mitigates psychological distress during the pandemic, indicating that we can better adapt by differently attending to recent experiences and maintaining perceived social support.

This study performed to identify a conceptual model to examine which sports event qualities affect the perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty as perceived by participants of a mega sport event. Using a structural equation modeling analysis, this study found that only outcome quality had a significant influence on both perceived value and satisfaction. In addition, event quality was significant antecedent factor of satisfaction. Furthermore, significant relationships were identified among perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty. The implications for academic researchers and sports event organizers are discussed.

본 연구는 유치경쟁이 치열해지고 있는 메가 스포츠 이벤트를 성공적으로 진행하기 위한 방안의 모색을 위하여 방문객마다 다양한 행동으로 구체화되어 다르게 나타나고 방문객의 만족도에 영향을 미치는 메가 스포츠 이벤트 방문객의 방문동기를 실증분석하고 방문동기와 만족의 차이를 알아보고자 한다. 국민체육진흥공단의 분석에 따르면 메가 스포츠 이벤트의 개최는 경제 활성화에 큰 도움이 되고 고용창출과 홍보효과를 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 이 연구에서는 2003년과 2011년 대구 스타디움에서 개최된 메가 스포츠 이벤트 방문객을 대상으로 설문조사를 시행하여 방문객의 방문 동기와 만족의 차이를 파악하고자 신뢰도와 타당도 검증, 요인분석, 상관분석, 정규분포의 평균차이 검증, 분산분석, 회귀분석을 실시하였다. 본 연구에서는 26항목의 방문 동기에서 6요인의 방문 동기요인(사교와 문화적 탐구, 이벤트속성, 가족친화성, 일상탈출, 소속감, 대회에 대한 관심)이 추출되었고, 각각의 메가 스포츠 이벤트 방문객의 방문 동기가 달랐으며, 방문동기와 만족 간의 영향 관계에서는 방문 동기는 전반적인 만족과 항상 유의한 영향관계가 있지는 않았으나 방문 동기와 재방문간에는 유의한 영향관계가 있는 것으로 나타났다.

This research aims to seek measures for successful mega-sports event which have highly competitive bidding processes to become the host city. To answer the aim and objective, this paper compares the motivation and satisfaction of participants of the 22nd Universiade 2003 in Daegu and TIAAF World Championships Daegu 2011. According to Korea Sports Promotion Foundation’s report, the hosting of mega-sports events can lead to economic growth as well as providing job opportunities and creating positive country image. To achieve the purpose of this research, questionnaires were statically analyzed, using frequency analysis, factor analysis, t-test, descriptive statistics, reliability analysis, correlation analysis and regression analysis. The result and points of this study are as follows:Among 26 satisfactional attributes of the participants six factors(social & cultural study, attributes of events, family ties, escape from daily routine, sense of belonging, concern for the game) were extracted and visitor’s motivation varied according to visitor’s characteristics. There was not always statistical significance between the motivation of visitors and overall satisfaction. However, the motivation of visitors was significantly related with revisit.

기업의 동시기적(contemporaneous) 환위험노출을 분석하기 위해 기존의 논문들이 대표적으로 사용하는 Adler & Dumas (1984) 실증모형은 통계적으로 유의한 추정결과를 제시하는데 한계를 가지고 있다. 따라서 본 논문은 기존의 전통적인 방법론과는 달리 Event study 방법론을 사용하여 2008년 글로벌 금융위기 시 발생하였던 급격한 환율변동이 비수도권에 위치한 주요 4대 지역의 중소기업 수익률에 미친 효과를 분석하였다. 실증 결과로서 전체 기업의 약 51%가 환율변동에 유의하게 노출되는 것으로 발견되었는데, 이는 기존의 10% 내외의 성공률과 비교할 경우 매우 개선된 결과이다. 또한, 높은 수출비중과 많은 단기차입금을 가지고 있는 기업일수록 더 높은 노출정도를 보인 것으로 발견되었는데, 특히 단기차입금과 관련된 결과는 기존의 연구에서 다루어지지 않았다는 점에서 의미가 있다.

Existing literature using the standard empirical model of Adler & Dumas (1984) for estimating exchange -rate exposure of firms have difficulty in providing statistically significant results. Responding such difficulty, this paper first attempts to find the impact of the sizable exchange rate changes on returns of Korean "small and medium enterprises (SME)" located in 4 major regions out of the capital area for the 2008 global credit crisis period using the event study method. The primary finding is that about 51% of the total sample SMEs are significantly exposed to exchange rate fluctuations, which is an astonishing result compared to about 10% by most of prior studies. In addition, it is found that the significantly exposed SMEs have higher ratio of export to total sales and greater short-term debt, on average, rather than insignificantly exposed SMEs.

본 연구의 목적은 메가이벤트에 대한 지역민들의 참여 행동을 예측하는 요인들을 검증하는데 있다. 예측 요인검증을 위해 합리적 행위이론, 계획된 행동이론, 확장된 행동이론을 도입하여 요인들의 예측 설명력의 증감의 여부를 두 집단에 적용시켜 알아보았다. 특히 지역애착심이 메가이벤트의 성공적인 개최를 위한 중요한 요인임을 감안하여 확장된 계획행동이론의 선행변수로써 도입되었다. 또한 가설 검증과 위계적 회귀분석을 통하여 예측 설명력을 검증한 결과에 대한 재검증을 위해 두 집단에 동시에 적용시킨 PLS 구조모델 분석을 실시하였다. 2011 대구세계육상선수권대회가 개최되기 한 달 전 대구 지역민들이 가장 많이 이용하는 쇼핑몰에서 설문조사가 실시되었다. 총 420부의 설문이 배포되어 394부가 회수되었다. 설문지중 무응답치가 많거나 불성실하게 응답한 14부를 제외한380부가 최종 분석되었다. 분석결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 위계적 회귀분석 결과, 참여행동의사에 대해 태도, 주관적 규범, 지각된 행동통제 및 지역애착심이 예측변수로써 설명력이 높았으나 실제 참여행동에 대해서는 참여행동의사만이 예측설명력이 높았다. 둘째, PLS 구조모델 분석결과, 태도, 주관적규범, 지각된 행동통제, 지역애착심이참가행동의사에 모두 정(+)의 영향을 주었다. 셋째, 참가행동의사가 실제참가행동에 정(+)영향을 준 것으로 밝혀진반면 지각된 행동통제와 지역애착심은 실제참가행동에 유의미한 영향을 주지 못하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구 결과를 바탕으로 메가이벤트에 대한 지역민들의 적극적인 참여와 지지를 이끌어 낼 수 있는 실무적 시사점을 논의하였다.

The purpose of this study is to examine the predictive factors of local residents' participation behaviors in mega-events. This study adopts theory of reasoned action(TRA), theory of planned behavior(TPB) and extended theory of planned behavior and tests whether or not predictive powers of those factors increase. In particular,considering place attachment a critical factor for the mega-event to be successfully held, it has been adopted as a part of antecedents comprising of extended TPB. Furthermore, this study uses PLS structural modelling analysis to examine the suggested hypotheses as well as to re-examine the results of predictive powers from hierarchical regression analysis. The survey was undertaken at the largest shopping mall at Daegu where the Daegu residents the most frequently visit prior to the launch of the IAAF World Championships Daegu 2011. A total of 420questionnaires were distributed and 394 responses were collected. 370 responses are valid for analysis excluding 24responses due to incomplete answers. The results from the analysis are as follows: First, it was found that attitude,subjective norms, perceived behavioral control and place attachment showed the strong predictive powers toward participation behavior intention in the mega-event as a result of hierarchical regression analysis, whereas only participation behavior intention demonstrated the strong predictive powers toward actual participation behaviors of local residents.; second, it was also found attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control and place attachment had a significantly positive impact on participation behavior intention; third, it was revealed that participation behavior intention of local residents positively influenced their participation behaviors. Based on the results from this study, the practical implications were discussed.