Earticle

The multifarious array of benefits to the e-Government systems research, from evaluative frameworks and conceptual models to guidelines for initiatives, adoption, and assimilation, evidences the requirement, both from the researcher's and the practitioner's standpoint, of sound theoretical foundations that can be applied directly in practice. Grounded upon structuration theory, this paper proposes a framework for e-Government systems assimilation through the structuration of its organizational factors. Upon this proposition, we map the factors of e-Government systems assimilation with the organizational meta-structures of signification, domination and legitimization. The framework is then tested for the case of one particular e-Government systems of Korean government. The juxtaposition of the theoretical position and the practical findings leads us to isolate the organizational, technological, and inter-organizational factors that shape the meta-structures for the assimilation of e-Government systems. This framework offers interesting possibilities to researchers in exploring the relationships and insights into the complex interactions that shape the relationships among government, people and technology. Thus, the paper's contribution lies on three axes: first, the furthering of a theoretical perspective of e-Government systems assimilation; second, a detailed exposition of the structuration theory and an illustration of its application to the issues of e-Government systems assimilation in the organizational context; and finally, developed framework through the isolation of a usable set of theoretically grounded factors affecting e-Government systems assimilation that can be applied in future research and practice.

이 글은 A. Giddens의 구조화 이론을 이해하고 그것이 지니는 제도 및 행정에 대한 함의를 찾는 것을 목적으로 한다. 이러한 목적을 가지고 수행한 이 논문의 주요 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, A. Giddens의 구조화 이론에서는 동인과 구조간의 이중성, 즉 이들간의 상호전제와 중복 성을 전제하고 있다. 구조는 인간들의 기억 흔적과 실천적 의식 속에 존재하고 관행적 실천을 통해 현시화된다. 둘째, 구조는 규칙과 자원으로서 이들 중 규칙은 의미화와 규범으로 세분되 고, 또한 자원은 권위적 및 할당적 자원으로 구별된다. 이들 중 의미화와 규범은 구조의 세 가 지 이중성 차원들 중 의미화와 정당화 차원을 나타내고, 두 자원은 구조의 세 가지 이중성 차 원들 중 지배 차원을 나타낸다. 셋째, 구조가 시-공간적으로 널리 확장될 때 제도가 확립되는 데, 각 제도는 의미화, 권위적 지배, 할당적 지배, 정당화 각각에 따라 상징적, 정치적, 경제적, 사법적 제도로 분류된다. 끝으로, 구조화 이론의 함의를 살펴보면, 구조의 이중성은 인간들의 제도 실천이 일상적으로 이루어지는 의미에서 관례화를 의미하는데, 행정의 경우 관련 행위자 들의 관례화를 통하여 행정 제도가 역동적으로 유지되고 있음을 알 수 있다.

This paper attempts to understand A. Giddens’ structuration theory, and to find out it’s implications for public administration. The followings are main findings of this paper. Firstly, A. Giddens supposes duality of structure–and–agency and mutual premise between them. Structures exist in memory traces and practical consciousness, and they are instantiated through practical routine. Secondly, structure means rule and resource, and rule has two features, signification and norm, and resource has also two features, authoritative and allocative. Signification represents meaning dimension of duality of structure, and norm represents justification dimension of duality of structure. The two resources represent domination dimension of duality of structure. Thirdly, we call the time-spaciously extended structure as institution, there four kinds institutions(symbolic, political, economic, and judical), each institution is derived from signification, authoritative domination, allocative domination, and justification. Finally, structuration theory has implications for dynamic maintaining of public administration institutions. Routinization of public administration means instatiation and implementation of institutions.

The purpose of this study is to suggest a regulation determinant applicable for Internet- based convergent media. The adaptation of Internet in the media industry has dismissed the role of scarcity and pervasiveness which used to justify regulating media. A basic question is how technical feature of convergent media affects diversity, one of the essential goals of media regulation. The Structuration theory suggests that media technology doesn’t change the level of diversity directly, but it changes participant’s actions, consequently affecting the level of diversity in a society. Broadcaster as a gatekeeper has a strong incentive to have more power in screening and provisioning information in the process of delivering information to users whereas information owner and user also do so for their sakes. Diversity is promoted when information flows from its origins to final uses without constraints. Considering that the degrees of broadcaster’ s control of information flow are varied depending on architecture of convergent media and it affects the level of diversity it, the study concludes that the level of control over information flow by broadcaster can serve as a regulation determinant of upcoming convergent media. The study is the first to extend structuration theory to the media regulation study and is expected to make a practical contribution as it proposes a unified concept as a guiding rule for convergent media regulation.

최근 도심쇠퇴에 관한 관심이 도시재생과 맞물려 학계와 관계 그리고 실무계를 중심으로 커지고 있다. 이 연구에서는 행위와 구조를 변증법적으로 결합시킨 앤서니 기든스의 구조화이론을 통해 도심쇠퇴 현상을 설명하고자 했다. 도시연구에서 구조화이론은 지역의 제반조건과 행위자를 중시하는데 도시생태학과 정치경제학이 갖는 한계를 극복할 수 있는 유용한 이론이다. 아울러, 이 연구에서는 구축된 모델을 통해 동두천시의 도심쇠퇴를 분석해 모델의 적용가능성을 타진했다. 분석 결과 구조화이론이 도심쇠퇴 현상을 분석하는 데 유용하다는 결론을 보여주었다. 다만 구조화이론이 도시연구의 대안이론으로 자리매김하기 위해서는 다양한 사례연구를 통해 구조와 행위의 구체적 구성요소에 대한 일반적인 범주가 마련될 필요가 있다.

Recently urban issues related to the inner city decline has attracted interest from policy-makers and academics in Korea. In this context this paper is aimed at explain-ing the inner city decline through Antony Giddens’ Structuration Theory combined structure with agency dialectically. Structuration Theory is a useful model which is overcome the limitation of urban ecology and political economy. In this paper the downtown decline of Dongducheon city is examined by using the Structuration Theory Model, and applicability of the model is proved. As a result of applicability of the model, it is very useful to explain a downtown decline phenomenon of a city. But, in order to place this model as an alternative theory of urban studies, general categorization of component of structure and agency by various case studies will be needed.

The renowned “Epic of Geser Khan” is a vital part of Mongolian cultural heritage, woven with captivating folklore and legends. When it gained popularity in Mongolia, it led to various versions like “Peking woodblock printed Geser,” “Nomch Khatan’s Geser,” “Monk Zaya Pandita’s Geser,” “Zamlin Senchin’s Biography,” “Mongolian Lin Geser,” “Story of Tseveen’s Geser,” and “Geser in clear script.” In 1959 and 1960, B. Renchin and Ts. Damdinsuren contributed introductions and published these versions in the ‘Mongolian Memorial Writing Conference’ series, providing concise and detailed summaries in terms of content and size. Scholars believe that the narrative structures of the versions of “Peking woodblock printed Geser,” “Monk Zaya Pandita’s Geser,” “Nomch Khatan’s Geser,” and “Story of Tseveen’s Geser” share the similarity. It is suggested that “Yun Fu Se’s Geser,” published in 1716, is considered the subsequent volume of the “Peking woodblock printed Geser.” Hence, the objective is to scrutinize the narrative patterns within the novels “Yun Fu Se’s Geser” and “Peking woodblock printed Geser”, aiming to clarify and explain the interrelationship between these versions. It is a method of imagining epic events without a specific sequence. When comparing the two volumes, Firstly, it follows a common sequence in Mongolian epics. Time is often emphasized at the start, detailing the hero, his loyal companion, the assisting knight, and sworn oaths. Various obstacles are then introduced in diverse ways. Secondly, despite the Hero’s triumph, a contradiction arises as the seeds of suffering ripen within him. In Geser’s youth, an archenemy seizes his possessions and robs his parents, leading to Geser’s growth into a hero. This recurring pattern shapes the overall structure of the novel. The ensuing analysis employs structural theory to explicate internal connections, detailing how a fixed typology was utilized to iterate and elaborate upon the content of Geser’s novel. Thirdly, the queen gets captured, the hero’s home faces an invasion, and the hero chases and rescues, restores order, defeats enemies, and gains glory. The story of the Mongolian epic revolves around two main themes: the adventure of the hero’s wedding, and the battle against the monster, witch, or the other tribes. Based on these two themes, the new chapters of Geser’s novel, enriched with stories of heroes’ adventures, and heroic battles were created in interaction with oral and written traditions. Chapters XII and XIII of “Yun Fu Se’s Geser” exhibit a similar syntagmatic structure to the battle group featuring Sharaygol’s three kings in “Beijing Tiger’s Geser.” However, in “Yun Fu Se’s Geser” the events unfold on a grand scale, characterized by a high narrative frequency and a rich linguistic composition. Notably, these chapters align more with the tradition of written literature, preserving a distinct emphasis on detailed character descriptions and pronounced event depictions, in contrast to the oral tradition.

Few would challenge the notion that social reality is created by human agents operating in the pre-existing social structure. However, social theorists are divided over how structure and agencies are related. Anthony Giddens’ structuration theory and Jeffrey Alexander’s multidimensional theory represent efforts to overcome the basic dualism of “interpretative” and “structural” sociology. Both theories attempt to explain the historical processes engendering the structures that mold human social life and strive to overcome the problem of dualism between structure and agency. In this paper, Giddens’ structuration theory and Alexander’s multidimensional theory are assessed in light of the question of whether they have contributed any insights not already anticipated in the classical tradition of sociological thinking. The paper argues that both Giddens and Alexander largely fail to accomplish this task of convergence. It is also argued that while Giddens work shows an inclination toward a micro direction, Alexander ultimately leans toward an extreme macro level of social reality.

사회과학에 속하는 회계학에도 실증적 방법론, 비판적 방법론, 해석적 방법론 등의 많은 방법론이 있다. 구조화이론은 최근에 회계학에서 이용되는 해석적 방법론 중의 하나이다. 이것은 영국인 사회학자 Anthony Giddens(1938－)가 사회구성론(1984)에서 주장한 것으로 다른 사회과학에서 오늘날 많이 적용되고 있다. Giddens의 구조화이론은 사회시스템의 구조와 행위 사이의 관계를 이해하는 것과 관련있으며, 회계학에서는 관리회계분야에서 많이 이용되고 있는 바, 관리회계의 사회적 맥락을 이해하는데 유용할 것이다. 여기서는 구조화이론의 세 가지 차원(의미화, 정당화, 지배)에서 살펴보고 있는 바, 이 세 가지 차원이 특히 관리회계실무를 연구할 때 상호 관련되는 방식을 인식하는 것이 중요하며, 사회관계의 제도화에 회계가 포함되는 방식을 구조화이론을 이용하여 살펴본다. 회계현상에 구조화이론을 적용할 때, 주로 회계책임, 회계시스템의 안전성, 저항, 통제의 변증법, 회계윤리 등을 중심으로 연구되고 있다.

In the social science general and accounting specific, there are many methodologies such as positive, critical, interpretive. Structuration theory is one of interpretive methodologies used in the accounting discipline. It was suggested by an English Sociologist, Anthony Giddens(1938－) at the Constitution of Society(1984). It has been proposed that Giddens' structuration theory could be useful in attempting to understand the social context of management accounting in organizations. Structuration theory is concerned with understanding the relationship between the activities of knowledgeable human actors and the structuring of social systems. Management accounting systems represent modalities of structuration in the three dimensions of signification, legitimation, and domination. In studying management accounting practice, it is important to recognize the way in which the three dimensions of structure are interwined. The applicable fields of structuration theory to the accounting phenomena are the accounting system, accountability, stability and resistence of system, dilectics of control, accounting ethics. Structuration theory indicates the ways in which accounting is involved in the institutionalization of social relations.

참여정부는 국가균형발전을 통한 국가 경쟁력 제고를 국정의 중요 목표로 삼고 있다. 이는 지방분권에 의한 지방정부의 혁신적 역량 강화를 통해 달성 될 수 있을 것이다. 지방정부의 역량은 다양한 요소들 간의 상호 작용적 관계에 의해 구현된다. 이에 본 연구는 지방정부의 역량에 관련된 구성요소들을 포괄적으로 다루고 그들 간의 관계를 설명하는 이론 틀을 제시하고자 하였다. 본 연구는 혁신 역량을 둘러싼 행위자와 구조의 관계를 기든스(A. Giddens)의 구조화 이론을 적용하여 설명하였다. 특히, 구조화 이론의 특징적 요소인 구조의 이중성 개념과 층화 등의 주요 논점을 중심으로 혁신역량 구조화 모델을 제시하고 이를 통한 지방정부의 역량 강화를 강조하였다. 본 연구가 제시한 혁신역량 구조화 모델의 다양한 전략들은 지방정부의 운영과 발전에 새로운 발판을 제공 할 수 있을 것으로 기대한다. 이에 더하여, 기든스의 구조화 이론을 적용한 지방정부의 혁신역량 구조화에 대한 논의는, 지방정부 역량연구와 관련하여 시각의 포괄성과 새로운 이론적 모색이라는 측면에서 학술적인 의의가 있다.

최근 도심쇠퇴에 관한 관심이 도시재생과 맞물려 학계와 관계 그리고 실무계를중심으로 커지고 있다. 이 연구에서는 행위와 구조를 변증법적으로 결합시킨 앤서니 기든스의 구조화이론을 통해 도심쇠퇴 현상을 설명하고자 했다. 도시연구에서 구조화이론은 지역의 제반조건과 행위자를 중시하는데 도시생태학과 정치경제학이 갖는 한계를 극복할 수 있는 유용한 이론이다. 아울러, 이 연구에서는 구축된 모델을 통해 동두천시의 도심쇠퇴를 분석해 모델의 적용가능성을 타진했다. 분석 결과 구조화이론이 도심쇠퇴 현상을 분석하는 데 유용하다는 결론을 보여주었다. 다만 구조화이론이 도시연구의 대안이론으로 자리매김하기 위해서는 다양한 사례연구를 통해 구조와 행위의 구체적 구성요소에 대한 일반적인 범주가 마련될 필요가 있다.

Recently urban issues related to the inner city decline has attracted interest from policy-makers and academics in Korea. In this context this paper is aimed at explaining the inner city decline through Antony Giddens’ Structuration Theory combined structure with agency dialectically. Structuration Theory is a useful model which is overcome the limitation of urban ecology and political economy. In this paper the downtown decline of Dongducheon city is examined by using the Structuration Theory Model, and applicability of the model is proved. As a result of applicability of the model, it is very useful to explain a downtown decline phenomenon of a city. But, in order to place this model as an alternative theory of urban studies, general categorization of component of structure and agency by various case studies will be needed.

More recently, Advanced Information Technology of a firm such as KMS supports interpersonal communication and coordination of group works as well as business task. It means that AIT mediates human interaction in addition to support business functions to enhance the efficiency of performing tasks. The adaptive structuration theory is one of the most important theories that can describe the social aspects of AIT. The purpose of this study is to identify the appropriation of KMS based on AST and TAM. To empirically test the proposed model, this study performed an empirical research from a survey was conducted. Total 213 reponses were collected from the employees of several corporations who are using KMS and 203 responses were used in statistical analyses excepting 10 invalid reponses. The results show that perceived ease of use has a significant positive effect on perceived usefulness, faithfulness of appropriation, and consensus on appropriation. Also, faithfulness of appropriation and perceived usefulness have significant effects on user satisfaction in their KMS usage. But consensus on appropriation doesn't have significant effects on user satisfaction. The implication of this study is to help better understand the use of AIT in organizations by suggesting and empirically test the variables to explain the appropriation process of AIT. This study also implies that faithfulness of appropriation and consensus on appropriation are important to obtain user satisfaction of AIT users in general and of KMS users in particular.

이러닝은 인터넷과 시스템적 특성을 이용하여 사용자들의 정보나 지식획득에 기여하고 있다. 특히 많은 기업들이 구성원들의 역량 강화를 위해 이러닝을 도입하고 있어, 사용자 중심의 설계가 더욱 중요시되고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 사용자들이 이러닝에서 학습을 수용하고 채택하는 과정이 시스템의 실제 사용 정도와 관련이 있는 것으로 보고, 기술의 전유(appropriation)로 사용자의 태도와 행동을 예측해보고자 한다. 그리고 기업의 이러닝 도입 활성화를 위해서 요구되는 방안에 대하여 기술사용 관점에서 논의하고자 한다.

본 연구는 행위자와 구조에 대한 포괄적인 논의로 평가받고 있는 Giddens의 구조화(structuration) 이론을 이용하여 행정구역 통합과정에서 발생하는 갈등관계를 청주시･청원군 지역과 성남･광주･하남시 지역의 사례를 통해 살펴보았다. 통합논의 과정에서 발생하는 갈등과 관련된 행위자들의 행위는 상당부분 그들이 존재하고 있는 구조적 요인들에 의해 영향을 받고 있는 것으로 보인다. 행위자들은 그가 속해 있는 기관이나 단체(지방의회, 지방정부, 정당 등)로부터 영향을 받기도 하지만, 지역적 특성과 상황, 선거제도, 그리고 행정구역개편에 따른 정부 인센티브 등도 구조로서 그들의 행위에 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 행정구역개편에는 행위자에게 영향을 미칠 수 있는 다양한 구조가 존재하고 주요 행위자들이 속해 있는 구조(지역적 특성, 기관･단체의 성향)가 상이하기 때문에 통합 논의에서 반대의견 및 갈등이 초래된다고 할 수 있다. 이런 현상은 자치역량 및 경쟁력 강화 차원에서 자율통합이 추진되었으나 추진과정에서 지역 행위자들이 속한 구조의 영향으로 인해 정치적 이해관계에 의해 상당히 좌우됨에 따라 구조적 여건이 복잡하고 상이한 자치단체 간의 통합은 정부나 정치권에서 의도하는 형태로 진행되기 어렵다는 것을 의미한다.

This study analyzes the conflicts in the process of local administrative district consolidation, using Giddens's theory of structuration. The behaviors of actors against consolidation, which are related to conflicts occurring in the process of consolidation discussion, seem to be affected by structural factors within which the actors exist. The actors' actions are shaped by organizations to which they belong (e.g., local councils, local governments, political parties), local dimensions and conditions, the election system, and government incentives aimed at facilitating consolidation. Since there are a variety of structures that can affect the actors, and the characteristics of the structures within which they act differ, conflicts among the actors can be caused in the process of consolidation discussion. This means that local administrative district consolidation, initiated to enhance the competitiveness of local governments, is conditioned by political interests due to the structures to which local actors belong.

본 연구에서는 고등학교 지리수업이 안고 있는 대학입시 지도와의 관련성, 기초개 념의 중복성, 수업시간의 제한 등 세가지 문제점을 해결하기 위해 수업을 구조화하여 고등 사고 기능을 기를 수 있는 수업을 설계하고자 하였다. 그러기 위해서 행동이론과 구조분석 을 통합한 지리수업 설계에 대하여 단계적으로 다음과 같이 정리해 볼 수 있다. 우선, 제 1 단계로서, 학습자는 경험적인 현상의 기술인 자료를 조사하고, 과학자의 시점에 따라서 객관 성과 정확성을 유지하면서, 가설-검증의 과정을 통하여 說明的 知識에 이른다, 제 2단계에 서는, 추론적인 진술에 대한 비판적 사고를 통하여 공간구조를 분석하는 것으로 槪念的 知 識을 이론적으로 설명한다. 제 3단계에서는, 지역주민의 행위를 둘러싸고 있는 상황을 파악 하기 위해 자료를 비판적으로 다시 검토하여 사회 제도 간의 관계까지 實踐的 解釋에 이른 다. 제4단계로서는, 정보를 활용하는 능력을 기르기 위해 事例地域 學習에 대해 주체적으로 참여한다. 따라서, 행동이론과 구조분석의 통합을 통한 지리수업의 설계에서 본다면, 수업이 구조화되고 실증론에 대한 인식론적 입장에서 전개될 것이다.

Kyonggi Province in the late Chosun dynasty was a center of superior government offices including 'Han' River water-road transportation and was located in the middle of an 'X'-shaped arterial road network. Because of these reasons, Kyonggi Province had a faster inflow of commodities, informations and technics compared with the other province. At this period of time, every local 'Eup' (name of administrative district) had not been affected by their above administrative districts and had their own autonomy. For this reason, every 'Eup' could be developed as a town, even if its size was small when it had sufficient internal growing conditions. Moreover, the markets ('Si-Jon') in big towns and periodical markets which were spread over the Kyonggi Province played role of commercial functions of town. And because military bases for the defence of the royal capital in Kyonggi Province also took parts of a non-agricultural city role, Xyonggi Provinc had much more possibilities of growing as a town rather than the other provinces. The towns of the late Chosun Dynasty were, except the capital and superior administrative districts which were governed by the 'You-Su', small towns which had only about 3, 000-5, 000 people. Most of the town dewellers were local officials, nobles, merchants, craftmen and slaves. And the farmers who lived near town became a pseudo-towner through suburb agriculture. Among these people, the merchants were leaders of townization. The downtowns were affected by the landform and traffic roads. The most fundamental function of towns were administrative. The opcial's grade, which was dispatched to the local administrative district ('Kun' or 'Hyun'), was decided by the size of population and agricultural land of each county. Large county which was governed by a high ranking opcial had more possibilities to develop as a large town. Because they supervised other opcials of lower rank and obtained more land and population for the town. The phonomena of farm abandonment after the Japanese Invasion of Korea in 1592-1598 stimulated the development of towns for commercial function. The commercial functions of towns were evident in the Si-Jon or Nan-Jon (names of markets) in the big cities such as Hansung and Kaesung, meanffwhile in the local areas it was emerged in the shape of periodical market networks as allied with near markets (which were called as Jang-Si) or permanent markets which were grown up from periodical markets. These facts of commercial development induced the birth of commercial town. Kyonggi Province showed the weak points of its defense system during both wars (Japanese Invasion in 1592 and Manchu's Invasion in 1636). The government reinforced its defense system by adding 4 'You-Su-Bus' and several military bases. Each local districts ('Eup'), where Geo-Jins were established, were stimulated to be a town while Jin-Kwan system were, adjusted and enforced. Among Dok-Jins(name of solitary military bases), Youngjongjin was grown up as a large garrison town which only played a role of defense. The number of towns that took roles of non-agricultural functions in Kyonggi Province was 52. Among these towns, 29 were developed as big towns which had above 3, 000 people and most of these towns were located on the northwest-southeast axes of 'X'-shaped arterial trafic network in the Chosn Dynasty, This fact points out that the traffic road is one of the important causes of the development of towns. When we make hierarchy of the towns of Kyonggi Province according to its population and how many functions it had, we can make it as 6 grades. The virst grade town 'Hansung' was the biggest central town of administration, commerce and defdnse. The 2nd grade town includes 'Kaesung' which had historical inertia that it had been the c

이 연구는 법인자본주의에서 소유, 통제의 이중화를 일반이론적 출발점으로 삼아 자본주의 다양성론과 원리론의 통합을 시도한다. 그런 이론적 기반위에 이차대전후 현대자본주의, 특히 1980년대 초 이래 신자유주의의 역사적, 국민적 다양성을 설명한다. 마르크스의 『자본론』에는 생산의 제도적 주체인 기업론이 빠져 있다. 소유자, 경영자가 일체화된 소유자 자본주의론에 멈추어 있다. 제도주의 정치경제학의 관점에서 보면 『자본론』은 자본주의 일반이론이라기보다 단순이론적 측면을 갖고 있다. 법인자본주의에는 법률적 소유와 실질적 통제가 범주적으로 분리되면서 자본주의 사적 소유제에 중대한 변모가 일어난다. 사람, 물재, 화폐자금에 대한 사용·통제권은 경영자와 노동자 등 이해당사자의 수중에 놓인다. 나아가 법인기업은 규범적으로 공공적 사회제도로서의 성격을 갖게 된다. 법인자본주의에서 소유와 통제의 분리는 다시 자본 축적 구조라는 각도에서 바라볼 수 있다. 자본 축적 체제는 산업적 축적과 금융적 축적이라는 두 가지 중심축과 그것들의 복잡한 연관 관계에 의해 재구조화된다. 그러나 소유와 통제의 조합은 결코 순수한 자본형태의 이중화가 아니라 다층적 원리 및 진화경로 앞에 개방된다. 이에 따라 법인자본주의에서 자본 축적의 이중화는 매우 다양하게 나타난다. 그 이중화 방식의 다양성은 기본적으로 주주, 경영자, 그리고 노동자 삼자의 역학 관계와 계급타협의 다양성에 의해 규정된다. 금융주도형은 미국이 세계자본주의 패권국의 위치에 있기 때문에 신자유주의의 주도적 유형이라고 할 수 있다. 그러나 금융주도형 신자유주의는 동시에 매우 특수한 유형이기도 하다. 따라서 생산주의형의 신자유주의화 경로를, 금융주도형과 별개로 설정해야 한다.

This paper attempts to link and combine the theory of the varieties of capitalism with the principle of capitalism in general, based on the reformulation of the theory of the corporate capitalism. And thereafter it explains the historical and national varieties the contemporary capitalisms after the 2nd world war, particularly those of neoliberalism. In the corporate capitalism, the ownership rights and the control rights is separated each other. And more importantly, the regime of capital accumulation has the two-pronged movements with the two poles of the industrial accumulation and the financial accumulation. The forms of the two-pronged movements of the capital accumulation regimes becomes pretty much various. Basically, the varieties of them depend on the power relations and the class compromises between three classes, i.e. shareholders, managers and labourers. Finance-led regime of accumulation, which U.S. takes the lead in the age of global neoliberalism, is the main type and also very particular one. Therefore, it needs to consider the different path of the productionist neoliberalism, which is distinguished from the finance-led type.