Earticle

본 연구는 지난 17대 대선 캠페인과 관련된 여론조사보도가 흥미보도인지, 정책보도 인지에 대해 조선일보와 한겨레신문을 대상으로 고찰했다. 결과에 따르면, 한겨레신문의 정책보도 기사는 18.4%였으며 대체로 이명박 후보에게 부정적인 내용이 많았지만 긍정적인 기사도 다소 게재된 것으로 나타났다. 조선일보의 정책보도 기사는 17.5%였으며 이명박 후보에게 긍정적인 기사가 절대적으로 많았다. 한겨레신문의 흥미보도 기사의 비중은 69.4%로 높게 나타났다. 기사들은 대부분 이명박 후보에게 유리한 내용이었으며, 여타 후보들에게 유리한 기사가 일부 있었다. 조선일보는 전체 기사 중 68.4%가 흥미위주 보도였다. 특히 조선일보의 흥미보도 기사는 이명박 후보에게 유리한 기사를 절대적으로 많이 보도했다. 결론적으로 언론은 흥미와 정책 관련 여론조사 보도에서 앞서가는 특정 후보에게 유리하게 보도하는 행태를 보였다. 특히 흥미위주 기사는 대부분 앞선 후보에게 유리한 보도 행태를 보였다. 이는 진보적인 것으로 알려진 한겨레신문과 보수적인 조선일보가 크게 다르지 않았다.

This study explored newspapers’ reporting patterns of public opinion polls during the 17th presidential election campaign period in the country. According to the analysis, Hankyoreh’s policy reporting was 18.4%. The news articles were relatively negative toward Lee Myung-park while some of them were positive. Chosun’s policy reporting was 17.5%. Most of them were positive toward Lee Myung-park. Hankyoreh’s human interest reporting was 69.4%. Most of the articles were positive toward Lee while some of them were positive toward others. Chosun’s human interest reporting was 68.4%. Most of the articles were absolutely positive toward Lee. In conclusion, public opinion news articles in terms of policy reporting as well as human interest reporting tended to lean to the winning candidate. Specially, human interest articles tended to lean to the winning candidate absolutely even further. So called, the progressive Hankyoreh as well as the conservative Chosun showed the similar patterns.

Objective: To describe patterns of spontaneous reporting on adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) using the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine according to the Brighton Collaboration (BC) criteria. Methods: We used the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System (KAERS) database including vaccinations between 2008 and 2017. To apply BC criteria, we classified 58 BC AEFIs into World Health Organization Adverse Reaction Terminology (WHO-ART) codes. We applied MedDRA standard medical queries that were pre-defined as five BC AEFIs. Terminology mapping between MedDRA and WHO-ART terms was performed by three researchers. Descriptive statistics of individual case safety reports were analyzed according to BC applicability. Disproportionality analyses were performed on each BC AEFI and each preferred AEFI term according to the case-noncase approach; reporting odds ratio (ROR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Results: Among the 30,266 reports of vaccinations between 2008 and 2017, 2,845 reports included the HPV vaccine. Of these reports, 1,511 (53.1%) included at least one BC AEFI. Reports from physicians or manufacturers included more BC AEFIs than from other reporters. Injection site reactions and fever were frequently reported in BC AEFIs; spontaneous abortion and ectopic pregnancy (ROR, 14.29 [95% CI, 4.30-47.49]) and vasculitic peripheral neuropathy (ROR, 8.57 [95% CI, 2.61-28.10]) showed the highest ROR. Among non-BC AEFIs, dizziness or myalgia were frequently reported; exposure during pregnancy (ROR, 23.95 [95% CI, 16.27-35.25]) and inappropriate schedule of administration (ROR, 22.89 [95% CI, 16.74-31.31]) showed the highest ROR. Conclusion: BC criteria would be applicable for labeled AEFIs, whereas analyzing non-BC AEFIs would be useful for detecting unlabeled AEFIs.

본 연구는 2012년 4월 11일 치러진 19대 총선 캠페인에 대한 <동아일보>와 <한겨레신문>의 보도 행태를 고찰했다. 분석에 따르면, <한겨레신문>의 정책보도는 전체 기사 47건 중 3건, <동아일보>는 총 39건 중 2건에 불과했다. 또한 선거쟁점 보도는 <한겨레신문>이 32건, <동아일보> 24건 이었다. 흥미보도는 <한겨레신문> 8건, <동아일보> 6건이었다. 또한 네거티브 보도와 관련해서는 <한겨레신문>과 <동아일보>가 각각 1건이었다. 마지막으로 지역주의/연고주의 관련해서는 <동아일보>가 1건을 보도했다. 이처럼 두 신문은 19대 총선과 관련, 정책보도를 거의 하지 않고 쟁점보도에 치중한 것으로 드러났다. 단순한 순위경쟁과 같은 경마저널리즘 식의 흥미보도의 비중은 높지 않은 것으로 나타났다. 하지만 네거티브 보도와 지역주의 보도가 미미하지만 여전히 보도되는 것을 알 수 있었다.

This study explored the reporting patterns of the press including <Dongailbo> and <Hankyoreh> during the 19th general election campaign period in the country. According to the analysis, <Hankyoreh>’s policy reportings were 3 out of 47 and <Dongailbo>’s policy reportings were 2 out of 39. Regarding the election issues reporting <Dongailbo> showed 24 and <Hankyoreh> showed 32 reportings. <Dongailbo> showed 6 human interest reportings and <Hankyoreh> showed 8human interest reportings. Reregarding the localism reporting, <Dongailbo> showed 1 article. Like this two newspapers focused on the election issues reporting rather than policy reporting during the 19th general election campaign period. Portion of human interest reportings such as ranking competition and horse-race journalism were not relatively high. However, negative and localism reportings were shown even though they were not significant.

본 연구에서는 분기손익의 차별적 보고행태를 분석하였다. 최종보고성과에 해당하는 연차손익의 부호에 따라 경영자의 보고유인이 다르기 때문에 분기손실과 분기이익의 보고행태는 다를 것으로 예상된다. 그러나 분기손익의 보고행태 또는 이익조정에 관한 선행연구에서는 이러한 손익보고유인의 차별성을 고려하지 않았다. 그에 따라 선행연구에서 관찰된 손익보고패턴이 손실 또는 이익 여부에 관계없는 것처럼 오도될 가능성이 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 손실 또는 이익의 보고유인의 차별성으로 인하여 연차손실을 보고한 기업의 분기손익보고패턴은 연차이익을 보고한 기업의 분기손익보고패턴과 다르다는 가설을 검증하였다. 2003년부터 2011년 사이에 한국거래소에 상장된 금융업에 속하지 않는 12월 결산법인(3,589개 기업-년 또는 14,356개 기업-분기)을 대상으로 실증분석한 결과, 연차손실보고집단에서는 분기손실이 4분기로 갈수록 심화되는 반면에 연차이익보고집단에서는 분기이익이 분기별로 큰 차이를 보이지 않는 차별적 행태를 보였다. 이는 평균/중위수 차이분석 및 회귀분석에서 일관되게 관찰되었다. 선행연구에서는 4분기손익이 1~3분기에 충분히 반영되지 않은 손익을 조정하는 역할을 하며, 결산기의 외부감사인의 보수적 태도로 인하여 4분기손익 및 재량적 발생액이 타분기에 비하여 작다는 결과를 보고하였다. 그러나 이러한 1~3분기손익에 대한 4분기손익의 조정효과는 연차이익보고집단이 아닌 연차손실보고집단에서 두드러진 것으로 관찰되었다.

This study examines differential patterns of reporting quarterly earnings when a manager reports annual profit or loss. Previous studies documented that managerial incentives for reporting loss are different from those for reporting profit. This leads us to expect that loss-reporting patterns should be distinguished from profit-reporting patterns. However, few studies have pay attention to such distinction between loss-reporting patterns and profit-reporting patterns. We hypothesize thus that managerial reporting patterns are different between annual loss and profit firms. We test the hypothesis by examining (i) univariate comparison of mean and median differences across quarters and (ii) a multiple regression that allows the intercept dummy to vary across quarters along with control variables. The sample consists of 3,589 non-banking firm-years (or 14,356 firm-quarters) that are traded over Korea Exchange for 2003-2011 with non-missing data collected from KIS-Value database. The empirical results show that losses tend to be concentrated on the fourth-quarter while profits do not, supporting the hypothesis. Specifically, for the annual loss firms, the means (medians) of quarterly losses during the sample period are -0.0067 (-0.0039), -0.0092 (-0.0049), -0.0109 (-0.0078) and -0.0397 (-0.0262), from the first to fourth quarters, respectively. Meanwhile, for the annual profit firms, the mean (medians) of quarterly profits are 0.0168 (0.0146), 0.0187 (0.0157), 0.0166 (0.0132) and 0.0161 (0.0131) from the first and fourth quarters, respectively. The regression analysis of quarterly earnings yields qualitatively the same results as the univariate results. When we regress quarterly earnings on three dummies indicating corresponding three interim quarters after controlling for several variables, the incremental coefficients on the three interim-quarter dummies (0.0101 ~ 0.0149) are significantly greater than zero for the annual loss firms. On the other hand, the incremental coefficients on the three interim-quarter dummies are insignificant or do not show a consistent pattern for the annual profit firms (-0.0005 ~ 0.0016). This also indicates that the fourth-quarter earnings are consistently smaller than the interim-quarter earnings only for the annual loss firms. Prior studies document that the fourth-quarter earnings are in general lowered by the settling-up or reversal effect of understated expenses in the first three quarters and/or by auditor's conservatism. To examine whether this is observed regardless of the sign of annual earnings, we examine (1) the matching between interim-quarter revenues and fourth-quarter expenses, and (2) the distribution and magnitudes of quarterly discretionary accruals estimated from cross-sectional modified Jones model. First, we find that the interim-period revenue is significantly associated with the fourth-quarter expenses only for the annual loss firms. This implies that there exists the settling-up effect of interim-period earnings on the fourth-quarter earnings only for the annual loss firms, but not the annual profit firms. Second, the settling- up effect using the fourth-quarter discretionary accruals is not evident for the annual profit firms. Together these results suggest that the explanation that the lower fourth-quarter discretionary accruals are attributed to the settling-up effect and/ or auditor's conservatism is at best incomplete because of over-simplified analysis without distinguishing between loss and profit. This study contributes to the literature by providing a consistent evidence on the differential reporting patterns of quarterly earnings between the annual loss and profit firms so that subsequent studies exploring reporting patterns of quarterly earnings should consider such distinction. Also, the results in this study imply that researchers pay careful attention to take the settling-up effect and/or auditor's conservatism as an explanation of earnings management...

본 연구는 자발적인 공시와 경영성과 측정지표와 관련한 우리 기업들의 재무보고 행태에 관한 연구이다. 본 연구에서는 재무정보를 생산하여 전달하는 역할을 담당하고 있는 한국 상장기업의 재무담당임원(Chief Financial Officer, CFO)들을 대상으로, 재무정보 공시와 관련된 경영자들의 인식과 성과보고에 영향을 미치는 여러 요인에 대한 설문조사를 시행하여 재무보고행태에 대한 좀 더 실제적이고 직접적인 설명과 해석을 얻고자 한다. 한국 상장기업 총 99개사에 속해 있는 116명의 CFO에 대한 설문조사 결과는 다음과 같다. 경영자들의 가장 큰 자발적 공시 유인은 투명하고 신뢰할 수 있는 재무보고로 기업의 명성을 제고하는 것이다. 반면 기업의 중요한 정보가 외부에 누설될 가능성이 자발적공시를 저해하는 주요 요인으로 나타났다. 경영자들은 악재보다는 호재를 더 빨리 공시하는 것으로 나타나 정보의 성격에 따른 비대칭적인 공시행태가 상존하고 있음을 확인하였다. 경영자들이 가장 중요한 성과측정지표로 인식하는 것은 영업이익이며, 분기보고에서는 전년도 동일분기 주당순이익이 가장 중요한 준거지표(benchmark)라고 인식하고 있다. 목표 이익을 달성하기 위해 비용지출을 감소시킬 가능성이 높게 나타나, 한국 기업에서의 실물 이익조정 가능성이 확인되었다. 기업들은 이익유연화를 선호하였으며, 안정적인 이익을 보고하기 위해 기업 가치를 희생할 의향이 상당히 있는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 한국 상장사 CFO들의 재무보고정책과 관련된 유인 및 행태에 대한 직접적인 응답결과를 제시한 국내 최초의 광범위한 설문조사연구이다. 본 연구결과는 규제당국의 향후 정책 방향설정과 학계의 연구범위의 확장에 기여할 것이다.

We investigate firms' various incentives with respect to voluntary disclosure and performance measures (i.e., measures that represent the firm performance such as net income, operating income, cash flows, earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, etc.) which can decrease information asymmetry in financial reporting for outside stakeholders and other capital market participants. Financial reporting and voluntary disclosures can help relieving information asymmetry and thus agency problems between insiders and outsiders. Chief Financial Officer (CFO) plays an important role in producing and delivering financial information to outsiders. As a result, it is very important to understand the motivations and behaviors of CFOs for financial reporting. For this purpose, we survey 116 CFOs of 99 listed companies in Korea to collect concrete explanations on the factors that are related to financial reporting and disclosure decisions. From the answers we collect, this study examines how the manager thinks and reports performance- related factors in the financial reporting and disclosures. Similar to this study, Graham et al. (2005) surveys and interviews about 400 CFOs in the U.S. extensively and examines the factors related to firms' financial reporting behaviors. The study of Graham et al. (2005) has great impact on accounting areas, revealing various facts related to financial reporting. The survey results are summarized as follows. CFOs responded that the most important reason for voluntary disclosure is to raise the firms' reputation for transparent and accurate financial reporting. In contrast, the risk of revealing proprietary information makes managers reluctant to disclose more information voluntarily. Regarding the timing of disclosure, good news are released faster to the public than bad news, showing asymmetric reporting behavior. Among various firm performance measures, CFOs perceive operating income to be the most important performance measure. In quarterly reports, earningsper share (EPS) of the same quarter last year is the most important earnings benchmark for a firm. The incentives to meet earnings benchmarks are to convey future growth prospects to investors, to maintain and increase stock price, and to build financial credibility. We find strong evidence to support real activities management in discretionary spending (R&D, advertising, ets.) rather than accrual- based earnings management. The results are robust indeed considering the limitations of survey. This issue is relatively important because CFOs are less likely to admit that they are manipulating earnings or real activities to meet earnings benchmarks. As a result, the fact that CFOs admit the possibility of manipulating real activities implies that the incentive is very strong in Korean settings. Managers prefer smooth pattern of earnings in many reasons identified in the previous studies, especially for being perceived as less risky by investors. CFOs are more likely to sacrifice firm value for smooth earnings, rather than to meet earnings benchmarks. CFOs admit that institutional and foreign investors as well as financial analysts are important price-setters in stock market. This study is the first and extensive survey conducted in Korea to elicit direct answers from CFOs to their incentives and behaviors related to financial reporting. Especially, the fact that CFOs regard operating income as the most important measure for performance is an important finding. Additionally, the finding that CFOs are likely to manage real activities to increase earnings is also important. These findings are useful to guide regulators to set up appropriate policies and monitor firms. This study also complements prior empirical-archival studies on earnings management and corporate financial reporting decisions. The findings suggest that Korean studies should focus on the real activities management more. In this way, we believe that this study can cont...

본 연구의 목적은 최근 장애 유형 중 비중이 증가하고 있는 ‘자폐’ 관련 언론사(전국단위 신문사와 방송사)의 보도형태 변화를 분석하여 그 결과를 제시하는 것이다. 본 연구에서 설정한보도형태의 변화의 분기점은 2022년 인기리에 반영된 ‘이상한 변호사 우영우’ 드라마이다. 본연구에서 사용한 주요 연구방법론은 ‘텍스트 마이닝(text mining)’과 ‘언어네트워크 분석(semantic network analysis)’이다. 본 연구에서는 한국언론진흥재단의 뉴스 빅데이터 분석 시스템 빅카인즈(BIGKinds), 한국어 형태소 분석 프로그램 KrKwic, 워드클라우드 구현 사이트(wordcloud.kr), 의미연결망 분석 프로그램 Ucinet6, 네트워크 시각화 프로그램인 NetDraw 등 공인된 분석도구들을 활용하여 객관적으로 분석하고자 노력하였다. 본 연구의 주요 분석대상은 2021 년과 2022년 각 1년 동안 ‘자폐’라는 용어가 포함된 전국단위 신문사와 방송사의 보도기사 제목들이었다. 본 연구결과로는 2021년과 2022년의 ‘자폐’ 관련 언론사 기사 건수와 키워드 트렌드의 유의미한 증가 및 변화, ‘자폐’ 관련 언론사 기사 제목들에서 보이는 상위출현빈도 핵심어들의 변화, 연도별 핵심어의 연결정도 중심성값과 네트워크 그림의 변화를 분석하여 제시하였다. 본 연구결과는 특수교육과 장애복지 관련 연구자와 관련 기관 등의 장애인식개선 교육자료 개발과프로그램 이수 정책 등에 반영이 되길 기대해 본다. 또한 관련 연구자와 관련 기관 등에서는 전국단위 언론사와의 협조를 통한 장애인식개선 노력을 확대해 나가길 기대한다.

The purpose of this study is to analyze and present the results of the changes in the reporting pattern of media(major newspapers and broadcasters nationwide) related to ‘autism’, which has recently increased in proportion among the types of disabilities. The turning point of the change in the form of reporting set in this study is the drama “Weird Lawyer Woo Young-woo” reflected in the popularity of 2022. The main research methodologies used in this study are ‘text mining’ and 'semantic network analysis'. In this study, tried to objectively analyze using recognized analysis tools such as BIGKinds, a Korean morpheme analysis program KrKwick, a word cloud implementation site(wordcloud.kr), a semantic network analysis program Ucinet6, and a network visualization program NetDraw. The main analysis targets of this study were the titles of press articles by national newspapers and broadcasters, including the term ‘autism’ for one year, in 2021 and 2022. The results of this study include a significant increase and change in the number of articles in the media related to 'autism' and keyword trends in 2021 and 2022, changes in keywords with high frequency of occurrence in the titles of articles in the media related to 'autism', and the degree of connection of key words by year Changes in centrality values and network diagrams were analyzed and presented. The results of this study are expected to be reflected in the development of educational materials for improving disability awareness of researchers and related institutions related to special education and disability welfare and the policy of completing the program. In addition, related researchers and related organizations are expected to expand efforts to improve disability awareness through cooperation with national media companies.

본 연구의 목적은 국내 주요 신문사(중앙지, 경제지)의 NCS(국가직무능력표준) 관련 기사들의 기사건수, 키워드 트렌드, 핵심어, 관계도 변화 등을 확인하는 것이다. 연구의 대상은 2010년 1월 1일부터 2019년 12월 31일까지(총 10년간) 중앙지, 경제지의 NCS 관련 기사들이다. 연구의 주요 연구방법론은 대표적인 뉴스 기사 빅데이터 분석 서비스인 한국언론진흥재단의 빅카인즈를 활용하여, 기사건수 및 키워드 트렌드 분석, 주요 핵심어 추출 및 관계도 변화 등을 확인하였다. 연구의 주요 결과로는 첫째, 2010-2019년 10년간 중앙지 및 경제지 신문에서 NCS 관련 기사건수는 총 8,170건이며, 2013년 이후 관련 기사건수가 늘어나다가 2015년과 2016년에 가장 많은 기사들이 보도되었다. 둘째, NCS 관련 기사들의 주요 핵심어로는 교육과정, 국가직무능력표준, 특성화, 공공기관, 산업현장, 공기업, NCS기반 교육과정, 교육부, 학습모듈, 고용노동부 등이며, 분석대상 전반기와 후반기의 관계도의 의미 있는 변화가 확인되었다. 후속연구 아이디어로는 분석대상인 기사제목 및 기사내용을 다양하고 심도 있는 네트워크 분석기법을 활용하여, 의미망 분석 연구를 진행하는 것이다.

The goal of this study is to check the number of articles, keyword trends, keywords, and relationship changes in NCS of major domestic newspapers (central and economic). The subjects of this study were NCS-related articles from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019. The main research methodology of this study utilized the Bigkinds of the Korea Press Foundation, a representative news article big data analysis service, to analyze the number of articles and keyword trends, extract key keywords, and change relation map. The main results are as follows: First, the number of NCS-related articles in the central and economic newspapers in the 2010-2019 (10-year period) was 8,170, and the number of related articles increased since 2013, followed by the largest number of articles in 2015 and 2016. Second, the main keywords of NCS-related articles are the curriculum, national job competence standards, specialization, public institutions, industrial sites, public enterprises, NCS-based curriculum, the Ministry of Education, the learning module, and the Ministry of Employment and Labor. And, significant changes were identified. As a follow-up research idea in this study, a variety of in-depth network analysis methods are used to conduct semantic network analysis research.

본 연구는 A건설 내부 운영시스템에 축적된 2020~2025년 아차사고 자료를 활용하여 발굴 주체 직군에 따른 인지된 위험도 분류 특성과 요일·시간대별 보고 패턴을 정량적으로 탐색하는 데 목적이 있다. 원자료 13,908건 중 실무 전문가의 전수 스크리닝을 거쳐 확정된 유효 자료 5,051건을 분석 대상으로 하였다. 작업 공종과 아차사고 유형 간 분포 차이는 카이제곱 검정과 Cramér’s V로 검토하였고, 인지된 위험도 분류의 결정 요인은 순서형 로지스틱 회귀분석으로 분석하였다. 요일·시간대별 결과는 절대 보고 빈도에 기반한 보조적 기술통계 분석으로 검토하였다. 분석 결과, 작업 공종과 아차사고 유형 간 분포 차이는 유의하였으며, 효과크기는 작은 수준으로 나타났다. 또한 발굴 주체 직군에 따라 인지된 위험도 분류 경향에 유의한 차이가 확인되었고, 작업 공종 효과는 일부 공종에서만 제한적으로 나타났다. 요일·시간대별 분석에서는 09:00~11:00 구간에 보고 빈도가 상대적으로 집중되는 양상이 관찰되었다. 이러한 결과는 건설현장 아차사고 관리가 단순 신고 건수 확대를 넘어 발굴 주체별 분류 경향과 공종별 특성을 반영한 정밀 타겟팅 체계로 고도화될 필요가 있음을 시사한다. 다만 요일·시간대별 결과는 절대 보고 빈도에 기반한 탐색적 현황이므로 인과적 해석에는 한계가 있다.

This study aimed to explore classification characteristics of perceived severity by reporter-role groups and reporting patterns by day of week and time of day using near-miss data accumulated in Company A’s internal safety and health management system from 2020 to 2025. Among 13,908 raw records, 5,051 validated cases selected through exhaustive expert screening were analyzed. Distributional differences between work types and near-miss categories were examined using chi-square tests and Cramer’s V, and determinants of perceived severity classification were estimated using ordinal logistic regression. Day-of-week and time-of-day patterns were examined only as supplementary descriptive findings based on absolute report counts. The results showed significant distributional differences between work types and near-miss categories, with a small effect size. Reporter-role group differences were significantly associated with perceived severity classification, whereas work-type effects were observed only in a limited number of categories. Supplementary analysis also indicated that reports were relatively concentrated in the 09:00?11:00 time interval. These findings suggest that construction near-miss management should move beyond simply increasing report counts and adopt a more targeted approach that reflects reporter-group differences and work-type-related classification patterns. However, the day-of-week and time-of-day results should be interpreted as exploratory descriptive findings based on absolute reporting frequency rather than as evidence of causal or exposure-adjusted risk.

Territorial disputes are diplomatic and military conflicts between countries over their territorial boundaries. Recently, the disputes over islands of Dokdo (Takeshima in Japanese) and Senkaku(Diaoyudao in Chinese) have been hot issues. There have been frequent confrontations over Dokdo/Senkaku between the adjacent countries. The main purpose of this paper is to analyze the tendencies in the reporting on islands of Dokdo and Senkaku in Korean newspapers. This study deals with the reporting tendencies of two major daily newspapers (Chosu Ilbo and Hankyoreh Sinmoon) and examines their points of view on the dominium problem over Dokdo and Senkaku in 2013 through content analysis. The results are listed as follows. Firstly, in the analysis of the coverage on the Dokdo issue, the news media reported more of the issues from the political frame, sociocultural frame, and political conditions on Northeast Asian frame. Meanwhile, in the analysis of the coverage on the Senkaku issue, the news media reported more issues from the political frame, political conditions on Northeast Asian frame, and military frame. Secondly, Korean newspapers showed more negative views toward Japan than China when dealing with the conflict between them owing to historical reasons related to the colonization of Japan. Thirdly, the topics of the news reports moved from inter-national conflicts to international relationships in Northeast Asia. Fourthly, the tones of the arguments on territorial disputes moved from calm response to positive action.

본 논문의 목표는 2022년 2월 24일 시작된 우크라이나 전쟁을 국내 언론이 어떻게 보도해왔는지를 살펴보는 것이다. 일각에서 주장하는 친우크라이나, 반러시아 보도 경향이 어떻게 표출되었는지 고찰해본다. 이를 위해 매일경제신문과 조선일보의 신문 지면에 2년 동안 실린 기사들을 분석했다. 그 결과 서방 언론 보도를 인용해 중립적인 내용의 기사들이 많았다. 반면 러시아 언론을 인용하거나 국내 기자들이 해외 현장을 찾아가 자체적인 기사를 쓰는 비중은 상대적으로 낮았다. 러시아에 대한 부정적인 내용은 우크라이나에 대한 기사보다 훨씬 많았다. 러시아와 대리전을 벌이는 미국과 유럽 언론의 영향 때문이다. 하지만 러시아에 부정적인 보도 내용이 거짓이라고 단정할 수는 없다. 러시아에 잘못된 점이 있다면 사실을 전달하고, 전쟁 당사국들의 입장을 좀 더 균형 있게 보도할 필요가 있다.

The goal of this paper is to examine how the South Korean media has reported the Ukraine war, which began on February 24, 2022. It is also to see how the pro-Ukrainian and anti-Russian reporting trends that some argue have been expressed. To this end, the articles written on the newspaper pages of the Maeil Business Newspaper and the Chosun Ilbo were analyzed. As a result, there were many articles citing western media reports, many of which were neutral. The rate of writing articles citing Russian media or Korean reporters visiting overseas sites for their own coverage was relatively low. And also there were far more negative articles about Russia than about Ukraine. This is due to the influence of the US and European media, which are engaged in a proxy war with Russia. However, even if it is bad for Russia, it cannot be concluded that the news content is false. If there is anything wrong with Russia, it is the role of the media to point out as it is. Of course, it is important to listen to the positions of the warring parties and write a balanced article.