This article aims to examine the grammatical meaning of double passive, whose use is increasing, in light of cognitive linguistics. Generally, double passive is considered redundant or wrong. But sometimes, it cannot be replaced by other verb expressions. Double passive voice is used to remove ambiguity or emphasize passive voice. In some cases, when passive suffix is added to verb, the verb becomes causative and passive meaning disappears. Yet, when ‘eo-ji-da’ is added to passive suffix, the verb has a diversified meaning. Sometimes, in that case, verb only with passive suffice may be regarded grammatically wrong. Also, double passive is used in order to emphasize passive voice:, to show the trace, forcibility or intentionality of agent. Especially, when passive suffix is added to verb and the verb becomes intransitive, double passive is used to reinforce passive meaning by showing the trace of agent. Those double passives are formed when a speaker attempts to engage himself/herself in the context in interpreting it, i.e. cognitive subje ctification.
중앙어문학회 [The Society of Chung-Ang Language & Literature]
설립연도
1993
분야
인문학>한국어와문학
소개
국어국문학의 연구를 통하여 국어국문학의 발전에 기여하고 국어국문학의 학풍을 진작함에 있다. 이에, 국어국문학 연구 자료의 조사/수집/정리 및 연구 결과의 평가와 편집을 하고, 전국 학회 규모의 연구 발표회와 각 분과별 세미나의 개최를 연 4회 한다. 또한 <어문론집>(현재 32집 발간)과 연구물의 간행한다. 더불어 국내외 연구 단체와의 제휴도 그 목적이 있다.