Chosun's scholars, who proposed Bukhakron(北學論) in 18th century, argued that Chosun had to accept the developed civilization of Quing China. What was remarkable in Quning civilization was various production tools and living things. The scholars of Bukhakron(北學論) not only tried to make people's living condition more efficient and convenient by improvement of production tools and living things, but also pursued to establish a totally new culture or civilization. In that sense, Bukhakron(北學論) had an aspect to theory of civilization reconstruction. In Bukhakron(北學論), we can find the vestiges of toadism to chinese culture as well as deconstructing phase of that toadism. We can find also at a time the viewpoint that distinguishes between fact and value, and the viewpoint that does not in Bukhakron(北學論). The scholars of Bukhakron(北學論) seemed to think the newer the better, since they believe that there is a progress in history. They did not any more keep the viewpoint that there was a center(China) and the peripheral(Chosun), instead they started to compare the east(Asia) to the west(Europe). In a word, Bukhakron(北學論) was a landmark to show that the scholar's viewpoint on civilization had been changed to the modern one in 18th century.
목차
I. 머리말 II. 북학의 대상과 지향 III. 북학론과 華夷論ㆍ道器論 1. 中華遺制論과 華夷無分論의 交錯 2. 道器分離的 사유와 道器-致的 사유의 交錯 IV. 北學論의 東西·古今意識 1. 新式 指向의 古今意識 2. 東西意識의 대두 V. 맺음말 Abstract
키워드
Bukhakron(北學論)progress in historya center(China) and the peripheral(Chosun)the east(Asia) to the west(Europe)viewpoint on civilization
한림대학교 태동고전연구소 [THE TAEDONG CENTER FOR EASTERN CLASSICS]
설립연도
1963
분야
인문학>한국어와문학
소개
연구소는 한국 및 동양의 전통문화를 계승 발전시키기 위하여 한문연수를 통한 연구인력 양성과 연구사업수행을 목적으로 한다. 연구소는 위 목적을 달성하기 위하여 교육사업으로 한문연수과정을 개설하여 연구인력을 양성하고 고전문헌의 조사연구정리 학술지간행 고전번역출판 학술발표회개최 국내외연구기관과의 교류사업을 추진한다.