Earticle

초록

영어

This study examines policy area selection in 1,315 member-initiated bills with fiscal implications during Korea’s 20th National Assembly. It asks whether district legislators and proportional representation legislators differed in the policy areas through which they proposed bills with expanded public spending. Whereas previous studies of legislative behavior in Korea have focused mainly on bill sponsorship, passage rates, and legislative performance, this study shifts attention to the policy choices embodied in bills with fiscal implications. The bills are classified into eight policy areas, and the analysis combined descriptive statistics, cross-tabulations, multinomial logistic regression, and average marginal effects. The results show systematic differences by type of representation. Bills sponsored by proportional representation legislators were more concentrated in welfare and family policy and labor and environmental policy, whereas bills sponsored by district legislators were more concentrated in agriculture and land development, public administration and local affairs, and industry and economy. In the model controlling for committee membership, bills sponsored by district legislators had higher adjusted predicted probabilities of falling within agriculture and land development (+8.6 percentage points), public administration and local affairs (+6.7 percentage points), and industry and economy (+6.3 percentage points). By contrast, they had lower adjusted predicted probabilities of falling within welfare and family policy (-7.2 percentage points) and labor and environmental policy (-7.8 percentage points). The overall pattern remained similar in the model excluding committee membership. These findings indicate that type of representation is systematically associated with the policy areas through which legislators seek expanded public expenditure. By focusing on bills with fiscal implications, this study contributes to research on legislative representation, distributive politics, and policy attention in the National Assembly.

한국어

본 연구는 제20대 국회의 의원발의 재정수반법률안을 대상으로 국회의원의 대표유형에 따른 정책분야 선택 차이를 실증적으로 분석하였다. 기존 의원입법 연구가 주로 발의건수, 처리율 및 입법성과에 주목한 것과 달리, 본 연구는 대표유형에 따라 어떠한 정책분야의 재정지출 확대가 의원발의를 통해 제기되는가에 초점을 두었다. 이를 위해 8개 정책분야로 분류하고, 기초통계량 분석, 다항로지스틱 회귀분석 및 평균한계효과 분석을 수행하였다. 분석결과, 기초통계 및 교차분석에서는 대표유형에 따른 정책분야 분포의 차이가 확인되었다. 비례대표 의원은 복지가족 및 노동환경 분야에, 지역구 의원은 농림국토, 행정안전 및 산업경제 분야에 상대적으로 집중되는 경향을 보였다. 평균한계효과 분석에서는 지역구 의원이 비례대표 의원에 비해 농림국토(+8.6%p), 행정안전(+6.7%p), 산업경제(+6.3%p) 분야의 선택확률이 높고, 복지가족(-7.2%p), 노동환경(-7.8%p) 분야의 선택확률은 낮게 나타났다.

목차

< 요약 >
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 논의 및 선행연구의 검토
1. 대표유형, 정책분야 선택과 분배정치
2. 선행연구의 검토와 연구설계에 대한 시사점
Ⅲ. 연구설계
1. 분석자료 및 변수
2. 분석방법
Ⅳ. 대표유형별 정책분야 선택 분석
1. 정책분야별 재정수반법률안의 분포
2. 대표유형별 정책분야 선택 차이
3. 대표유형별 정책분야 선택에 대한 다항로지스틱 분석
4. 평균한계효과 분석 결과
5. 대표유형별 정책분야 반영률 및 처리유형 분포
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
English Abstract

키워드

저자

• 金大恩 [ 김대은 | 국회 입법조사관 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  의정논총 [Journal of Parliamentary Research]

• 간기

  반년간

• pISSN

  1975-6461

• eISSN

  2465-8324

• 수록기간

  2006~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 359 DDC 350