Earticle

초록

영어

This study applies the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to identify the optimal heating system for apartment housing. As energy efficiency in residential buildings has become increasingly important, four heating alternatives—central heating, district heating, individual heating, and cascade systems—were evaluated using five criteria: safety, economic feasibility, efficiency, environmental impact, and convenience. Sixteen sub-criteria were derived through literature review and expert input. A survey of 22 experts was conducted, and 21 valid responses were analyzed after consistency verification (CR ≤ 0.1). The results indicate that district heating is the most suitable alternative overall because of its superior safety, economic feasibility, and environmental performance. Individual heating showed relatively high efficiency due to its controllability, whereas the cascade system demonstrated balanced performance and emerged as a practical alternative in areas without district heating. Sensitivity analysis confirmed that the ranking remained stable under reasonable changes in criteria weights. This study contributes to the literature by presenting an integrated AHP-based framework that includes cascade systems, which have rarely been examined in previous research.

목차

Abstract
1. 서론
2. 이론적 배경
2.1 공동주택 난방방식
2.2 계층분석과정(AHP : Analytic Hierarchy Process)
2.3 기존연구 고찰
3. AHP 기법을 이용한 난방방식 선정
3.1 연구대상
3.2 연구 방법
4. 연구 결과
4.1 자료 분석
4.2 결과 해석
4.3 민감도 분석
5. 결론
[References]

키워드

저자

• 임소연 [ SoYoun Lim | CNCITY p&s ] 제1저자
• 이동형 [ Donghyung Lee | 국립한밭대학교 ] 제2저자
• 조은현 [ EunHyeon Jo | 국립한밭대학교 ] 교신저자

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  프로젝트경영연구 [Project Management Review]

• 간기

  반년간

• eISSN

  2799-3434

• 수록기간

  2021~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 325 DDC 658