Earticle

초록

영어

In this paper, I examine the sentence-final particle “mon” and classify it into three main categories. The first category is , where “mon” is used to provide reasons or supplementary information regarding a judgment or situation. The second category is , where “mon” is used to assert a statement contrary to the listener’s opinion. The third category is , where “mon ne” is used to reinforce the speaker’s statement for greater impact. A common feature among these three categories is that the speaker asserts the legitimacy of their statement. Furthermore, each category differs in terms of the existence or connection of the underlying situation as follows: First, in , before the utterance of “…mon,” there exists a situation such as the speaker’s judgment or claim that should be explained. The relationship between the situation and the explanation is not a strict logical one but maintains a hierarchical structure. Next, in , a situation precedes the use of “…mon,” but it involves a claim, question, or directive from the listener that opposes the speaker’s opinion or position. “Mon” is used in response to this, and unlike , it does not carry an explanatory function. In this case, the preceding situation and “…mon” are connected in opposition. Finally, in , “…mon ne” does not rely on any particular situation, distinguishing it from and , as “mon ne” can stand independently.

목차

1. はじめに
2. 先行研究と本稿の立場
2.1 坪根由香里(1994b、1996b)
2.2 橋本佳美(1997)
2.3 本稿の立場
3. ｢もん｣の3タイプ
3.1 ＜説明＞の｢もん｣
3.2 ＜対立＞の｢もん｣
3.3 ＜見せつけ＞の｢もんね｣
4. まとめ
【参考文献】
【用例出典】

키워드

저자

• 吉田玲子 [ Yoshida, Reiko | 梨花女子大学校 人文科学部 助教授, 日本語学 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  일본언어문화 [Journal of japanese Language and Culture]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-9585

• 수록기간

  2002~2025

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 730 DDC 495