Earticle

초록

영어

This paper addresses the perspectives of professional translators and translator trainees regarding Korean-English machine translation post-editing in comparison with human translation and revision. Six professional legal translators and six translator trainees participated in interviews one-on-one after completing two tasks for research purposes: translating Korean legal texts from scratch and post-editing DeepL machine translation outputs. Research participants generally agreed that machine translation quality was acceptable for moderately difficult Korean legislative texts. Participants mentioned some challenges in post-editing, including perceived difficulties regardless of the post-editing guidelines, such as deciding the scope of revisions, selecting legal terminology, and in comparing the original text with the machine-translated text for the purpose of identifying necessary changes. However, post-editing was reported to save cognitive load and time for draft translation. Both professionals and trainees had a positive outlook on the usage of machine translation for legal translation, but also voiced concerns about the potential impact on translators' roles and job prospects. These findings underscore the importance of incorporating technological advances into translation training and practice, and of reevaluating the role of translators.

목차

1. 서론
2. 포스트에디팅 관련 선행 연구
2.1. 번역사 인식
2.2. 전공생 인식
3. 면접조사
3.1. 연구 문제와 연구 방법
3.2. 연구 결과
3.2.1. 법률 기계번역 품질에 대한 의견
3.2.2. 포스트에디팅 작업과 애로사항
3.2.3. 포스트에디팅과 인간번역 및 감수와의 차이
3.2.4. 법률 기계번역 활용 전망
4. 결론
참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 이지은 [ Lee, Jieun | 이화여자대학교 통역번역대학원 ]
• 최효은 [ Choi, Hyoeun | 이화여자대학교 통역번역대학원 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  통번역학연구 [Interpreting and Translation Studies]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1975-6321

• eISSN

  2713-8372

• 수록기간

  1997~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 717 DDC 400