Earticle

초록

영어

Contrasting the Classical Japanese and Modern Korean aspectual forms that originated from existential verbs, this paper argues that there is a parallel relationship between the two languages in that both have intentionality as a factor in the choice of aspectual form. First, referring to An and Fukushima (2005) and Kim, Kyung-ae (2006), we confirm the similarity between Classical Japanese and Modern Korean as well as the difference between -ko iss- and -e iss- in Modern Korean. We go on to reveal that there are commonalities in the uses of aspectual forms in Classical Japanese and Modern Korean. One of the similarities between the two languages is that a factor in the choice of aspectual form is whether or not the relevant action or state is maintained by the subject, though the use of the two forms in Korean is not restricted by animacy or genericity. We suggest that the restrictions on animacy and genericity observed in Classical Japanese reflect the semantic difference between the existential verbs iru and aru.

목차

1. はじめに
2．日本語と韓国語の存在型アスペクト形式をめぐる議論
2.1 中世末期日本語と現代韓国語
2.2 現代韓国語：고 있다と아/어 있다
3. 中世日本語と現代韓国語の共通性
3.1 中世日本語の｢ている／てある｣の選択要因
3.2 中世日本語と現代韓国語とを比較して
4. おわりに
【参考文献】

키워드

저자

• 野田高広 [ Noda, Takahiro | 韓国外国語大学 日本言語文化専攻 助教授 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  일본언어문화 [Journal of japanese Language and Culture]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-9585

• 수록기간

  2002~2025

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 730 DDC 495