Earticle

현재 위치 Home

CISG의 한계와 UNIDROIT원칙의 적용가능성
Limitations of CISG and Applicability of UNIDROIT Principles

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    한국무역통상학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    무역통상학회지 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제23권 제2호 (2023.04)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.21-36
  • 저자
    김은빈
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A430761

※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

원문정보

초록

영어
It is necessary to present that the UNIDROIT principle can be applied to international commodity sales contracts through arbitral award on the limits of application of CISG, and to examine how it is applied. In the following, we will examine the applicability of the UNIDROIT principle as a supplement for defects in Article 7 of the CISG. The CISG is a hard law as a convention, but the biggest feature of the UNIDROIT principle is that it is not a convention like the CISG, so it does not need to be domesticized through ratification procedures in each country, and it is non-binding and soft law. The CISG can be legalized domestically through ratification by the state, but the UNIDROIT principle cannot be legalized domestically through ratification. This characteristic allows the UNIDROIT principle to define matters wider than CISG. In addition, the UNIDROIT principle is based on universality and equity in domestic transactions, so it is highly applicable. Through a comparative legal review of the CISG’s defect supplementation regulations, we intend to clarify the defect regulations to promote predictable application of the law to international transactions with high uncertainty. The principles of CISG and UNIDROIT can be seen as a representative unified law applied to international commodity sales contracts. To this end, a comparative analysis was conducted with the UNIDROIT principle’s defect supplementation regulations, and as discussed in the attitude of the arbitral award, this attempt can play a role in finding a solution to the extent that the UNIDROIT principle has not been resolved by CISG. Therefore, in order to adapt the Convention to new needs and to develop each arbitration case according to the practical situation through analysis, the interpretation and defect supplementation of the Convention will be an important means of UNIDROIT.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. CISG의 한계와 UNIDROIT 원칙
Ⅲ. CISG의 한계에 관한 중재판정의 태도
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌

키워드

CISG UNIDROT CISG Art 7 Limitations of application gap-filling law Arbitral Award

저자

  • 김은빈 [ Eun-Bin Kim | 부산대학교 무역학부 강사 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    한국무역통상학회 [Korea Research Association of International Commerce]
  • 설립연도
    2000
  • 분야
    사회과학>무역학
  • 소개
    국제무역에 관한 학술활동 1. 연구발표회 개최 2. 학술지 간행 3. 산학협동을 위한 조사 연구 4. 국제학술교류 5. 기타 학회 목적에 부합하는 사업

간행물

  • 간행물명
    무역통상학회지 [Journal of Korea Research Association of International Commerce]
  • 간기
    격월간
  • pISSN
    1738-4354
  • 수록기간
    2001~2025
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 326 DDC 380

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 무역통상학회지 제23권 제2호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장