Earticle

초록

영어

Vaccine diplomacy is a manifestation of competition for political influence among great powers amidst the Covid-19 pandemic’s blatant illustration of ineluctable interdependency across the global community. The reinforcement of trends bolstering global polity construction intensify concomitantly with nationalist populist value and attitude expressions increasing political polarization. The interdependency graphically illustrated in the Cold War-era’s mutual assured destruction incentivized competition into indirect competitive intervention in the internal politics of third actors. Indirect international influence contestations included extended, de facto challenge competitions to generate soft power on behalf of the victor, e.g., the space race. The Covid-19 pandemic has intensified this competition to offer alternative development models while intense domestic political polarization undermines the mobilizational capacities for achieving sustainable development. In contrast to multinational and multiethnic states, nation states have an inherent mobilizational advantage because of the enhanced control capabilities available to the authorities without emphasizing coercion. Control through Gramscian hegemonic mechanisms is more readily feasible in nation states through the greater feasibility of commodification of social relations by states authorities regulating and channeling social competition to encourage social mobility and creativity. The regulation of the so-called private sector serves to manage and contain social competition while channeling it to develop the institutional capacities for control and allocation of developing societal human resources. It enhances developed state control mechanisms and international influence capacities. The appeal of offers of aid and assistance to the so-called developing world becomes ever more urgent amidst Anthropocene crises including its most recent, current Covid-19 pandemic disaster.

목차

Abstract
1. INTRODUCTION
2. THEORY
2.1 Nationalism and Ideology
3. APPLICATION
3.1 Beijing Consensus
3.2 Nationalistic Universalism
3.3 Hegemony and Interdependence
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Diplomatic Bargaining Leverage
4.2 Competitive Interference and Economic Nationalism
5. CONCLUSION
6. ACKNOWLEDGMENT
REFERENCES

키워드

저자

• Benedict E. DeDominicis [ Prof., Department of International Studies, Catholic University of Korea ] Corresponding author

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology(IJACT)

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  2288-7202

• eISSN

  2288-7318

• 수록기간

  2013~2025

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 600 DDC 700