Earticle

초록

영어

The main purpose of this paper is to compare referencing conventions between English-translated Korean laws and non-translated American and British laws in terms of collocational salience and frequencies. Intertexual or referencing devices serve specific functions in the discourse of law, which include signaling textual authority, providing terminological explanation, and facilitating textual mapping. Common law jurisdictions have developed their own preferences in the use of referencing patterns for displaying each function, and established specific contexts of use in their official legislative guidelines. In this respect, English translations of intertextual devices in Korean laws need to reflect the referencing conventions of non-translated laws in order to meet the cognitive expectancy norms of their intended foreign recipients and reduce difficulties with their interpretation at court. The comparison of collocations of main editing units of legislative provisions used in the translated and non-translated law corpora revealed that the translated laws show salient departures from the referencing conventions of TL non-translations for each function, thus requiring revised translation guidelines for ensuring convergence with TL non-translations.

목차

1. 연구의 목적
2. 영미법 상호텍스트장치 관련 정량적 연구의 동향과 필요성
3. 코퍼스 편찬 절차 및 분석 방법
4. 번역·비번역 법령 코퍼스의 상호텍스트장치 사용관습 비교 결과
4.1. 텍스트 근거 표시 기능 상호텍스트장치 사용관습 비교 결과
4.2. 용어 설명 기능 상호텍스트장치 사용관습 비교 결과
4.3. 텍스트맵핑 촉진 기능 상호텍스트장치 사용양상 비교 결과
5. 결론 및 제언
참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 유정주 [ Yoo, Jeongju | 한동대학교 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  통번역학연구 [Interpreting and Translation Studies]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1975-6321

• eISSN

  2713-8372

• 수록기간

  1997~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 717 DDC 400