Earticle

초록

영어

“The interconnection between the Way of Heaven and human nature and destiny” (tian dao xing ming xiang guan tong ) as Neo-Confucian innate logic originates the question, that is how to justify “the difference between the human and the animal.” Zhu Xi’s response to the question in The Exegesis of the Collections of Texts from the Four Books (Sishu Jizhu ) is full of controversies, and unexpectedly it started the “Ho-Rak debates” in the 18th-century Korean Confucianism. However, in 17th-century Chinese Confucian scholar Wang fu-zhi in his Reading on The Encyclopaedia the Four Books (Du sishu daquan shou ) had criticised Zhu Xi’s theory. This article clarifies Wang’s criticism on Zu Xi and make a preliminary investigation of Wang’s theory of material force (qi ).

목차

논문 초록
一. 前言
二. 朱子《中庸》首章「天命之謂性」與《孟子·告子上》「生之謂性」章注中對「人性, 物性同異」的看法
三. 王船山對朱子《中庸》首章「天命之謂」章注的批判
四. 王夫之對朱子理氣論的批判 : 「氣論」 的提出
五. 結論
參考文獻
Abstract

키워드

Heavenly Mandate Principle and Material Force Theory Material Force One Principle and Many Manifestation Theory of the Difference between Human Nature and Thing’s Nature 天命 理氣論 氣 理一分殊 人性 物性同異論

저자

• 呂政倚 [ 여정의 | 臺灣中央硏究院中國文哲硏究所助硏究員 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물