해역네트워크의 관점에서 다시 보는 부산항 부산항 : 연구를 위한 이론적 시탐(試探)
Busan Port from the perspective of sea area network - Theoretical examination for the study of Busan Port
Takeshi Hamashita, a leading Japanese scholar who sought to grasp Asia in diverse regional relations, conceived the modern era of East Asia by conceptualizing the traditional relationship between East Asia and the East Asian region as a tribute system in his hesitation, The tribute System and Modern Asia. In East Asia, the traditional tributary system was formed as a co-existence method, which meant the interrelationship in which multi-cultural networks operated with a complex regional relationship, not a single center. What is meaningful in Hamashita's logical structure is the deployment of a third port beyond the concept of binomial confrontation, which is an attempt beyond the dual alternative perception of Quantum choice. And this medium is the network. He said that the history of East Asia since the mid-19th century can be understood by the formation of a field network in Asia, which is different from the modern East Asian history of Europeanization and confrontation with Europe. The principle of wide-area order in Asia, which is different from that of modern countries, needed a wide-area merchant network, and this was the driving force of modern Asia. This article examined the status of Busan by using Hamashita's view that the network between the city and the city, which opened in the waters of Northeast Asia, is the formation of a network of open port networks. Many studies have been conducted, either Busan Research or Busan Studies, which reviewed the results of this study and checked the deficiencies in the conventional study from the external perspective of the open port network. Since the Joseon Dynasty, Busan has provided a space called '倭館' for Japanese trade. After the opening of the port in 1876, Waegwan (Waegwan) was transformed into a Japanese land and remained until before liberation. As such, from the perspective of the network, Busan is historically closely related to Japan. This is an important factor in identifying Busan Studies or Busan personality. However, since modern times, Chinese and Westerners have also visited and resided in Busan Port, in addition to the Japanese. Although the lack of data has not activated the relevant research, this is a clear fact. The achievements of Asian researchers such as Ryota Ishikawa disprove this. The activities of a Chinese merchant in Northeast Asia and the establishment of a settlement of the Qing Dynasty in Busan are typical examples. What is noteworthy here is that the initial Busan burn also came from Japan. This shows that one important axis connecting the open port network in Northeast Asia was the network caused by burns. Japanese occupation after the video due to decrease the number of Chinese since, and working class to find a job of Busan, Korea, but expand further as the advent of the video is an open portCompare favorably to show the network. The Japanese occupation of Busan for entry to the continent as the entrance of Japan. It was a crowded place where people came by Busan Shimonoseki Ferry and tried to head for Manchuria. Busan Station, built near the port of Busan, was built earlier to transport them to Manchuria. During this period, Busan was actively used as a port for Japan's advancement into the continent along with Najin(羅津) and Cheongjin(淸津). As the function of Busan Port and the occupations of residents were defined by Japan, Busan Port seems to be out of the existing open port network, but it still functions as a physical network and as a mediated port of human network of human movement. After liberation and through the Korean War, Busan became a city of refugees in its traditional form, namely the colonial legacy that Japan left behind. On top of the traces left by the Japanese, fault lines due to the devastation of the war were piled up, and the birth of the marine industry began with modernization. Busan personality was sprouting right here.
목차
서론 1) 동북아해역과 네트워크 2) 동북아해역과 이동 3) 동북아해역과 공간: 근대 부산항의 탄생 결론 Abstract
동북아시아문화학회 [The Association of North-east Asian Cultures]
설립연도
2000
분야
복합학>학제간연구
소개
동북아시아 문화의 다양성과 정체성을 연구 토론하고, 지역내 문화 교류의 다양한 모습을 연구하고 문화변동의 큰 틀을 집적함으로써 우리 민족 문화 및 상대 민족의 문화적 터전을 이해하여 문화공동체적 특성을 계발하고 상호 관련성의 강화를 유도하는 학술활동을 통해 동북아시아의 문화발전에 이바지함.