Exercise interventions to improve postural malalignments in head, neck, and trunk among adolescents, adults, and older people : systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Mohammad Bayattork, Margrethe Bordado Sköld, Emil Sundstrup, Lars Louis Andersen
언어
영어(ENG)
URL
https://www.earticle.net/Article/A369673
※ 기관로그인 시 무료 이용이 가능합니다.
4,500원
원문정보
초록
영어
Despite the widespread use of postural correction in exercise interven-tions, limited experimental evidence exists for its effectiveness. The present study aimed to systematically review the literature on the effi-cacy of exercise interventions in improving postural malalignment in head, neck, and trunk. A systematic review was performed by screen-ing four scientific databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane database) for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in English from 1996–2019. The review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement guidelines. Two researchers independently performed study screening, extracting data and assessing the risk of bias for each included study using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for evaluating the risk of bias. A total of 22 RCTs comprising 1,209 participants were identified for in-clusion in the review. There was a high risk of bias across most of the included studies (12 studies). Only two studies were classified as low risk of bias, and eight studies were classified as moderate risk of bias. The intervention duration ranged from 2 to 13 weeks, frequency from 2 to 4 days per week, and duration of each session between 15 to 60 min. The insufficiency and quality of included studies did not allow an inte-grated assessment of the efficacy of exercise interventions on postural malalignments; however, the positive effects noticed in most of the studies indicate some advantages but underscores the necessity of ad-equately designed RCTs in this field.
목차
Abstract INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS Protocol and registration Eligibility criteria for considering studies for this review Information sources and search strategy Study records Risk of bias assessment from individual studies Analysis and GRADE approach RESULTS Study selection and characteristics Risk of bias and quality of evidence within studies DISCUSSION The key issues impacting on the outcome Future research priorities Limitations CONCLUSIONS CONFLICT OF INTEREST SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL REFERENCES
키워드
ExercisePostureMalalignmentAdolescentsAdults
저자
Mohammad Bayattork [ Department of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, Faculty of Humanities Science, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark ]
Corresponding Author
Margrethe Bordado Sköld [ National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark, Department of Occupational and Social Medicine, Holbæk University Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark ]
Emil Sundstrup [ National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark ]
Lars Louis Andersen [ National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark, Sport Sciences, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark ]