Earticle

현재 위치 Home

한국

김수영과 베이다오 산문에 나타난 참여의식 비교연구
A Comparative Study of Consciousness of Participation by Prose KimSu-young (金洙暎) and Bei Dao (北島)

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    동북아시아문화학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    동북아 문화연구 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제61집 (2019.12)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.57-71
  • 저자
    이미옥
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A367449

※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

원문정보

초록

한국어
This study aims to make a traced comparison following the trend of social change for the participation awareness as the common characteristics displayed in the essays of Kim Su-young who is known as the representative poem of participatory poem during 1960s in Korea and Bei Dao who is known as the representative poem of misty poetry in 1980s in China. These two poets were the representative runners of the participatory poems with clear foot print in the literature history, and their essays also have undertaken an important role in displaying their activities and ideologies as the participatory poets. Through the essay collection of Bei Dao, it displayed the activities and life style of Bei Dao after his defection as well as tracing down on what influence would the people he met in his exile and incidents he experienced on the participation awareness of Bei Dao. If there is a difference, Kim Su-young structured the theory on his participatory poetry mainly through the essays but Bei Dao expanded the participation awareness through his life on exile and record on people of exile while displaying the activities of participation as an activist poet. Under this article, their participation awareness as appeared on their essays is compared in three aspects. First, it is the part that the discourse was undertaken (Kim Su-young) on participation literature through essays and records his activities as a participation poet after the revolution in essays. Kim Su-young strenuously asserted his opinion on participatory poems on his essay in 1968 and further dissipated his theory on participatory poetry as well. Bei Dao did not personally mentioned, but through visiting the conflict areas, he occasionally implied the possibility of participation through verbal expression. Second, (it also forms an axis in poetry) it would be the criticism on daily lives where the capitalism has penetrated and this is also deemed as a way of participation.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 산문을 통한 김수영의 참여론과 베이다오의 참여 기록
Ⅲ. 김수영과 베이다오의 자본주의 일상 비판
Ⅳ. 맺는말
참고문헌
논문초록

키워드

김수영 베이다오 참여의식 산문 비판 일상성 자본주의 비판. KimSu-young Bei Dao Consciousness of Participation Prose Criticism everydayness criticism of capitalism

저자

  • 이미옥 [ Lee, Mi-Ock | 명지대학교 방목기초교육대학 객원교수 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    동북아시아문화학회 [The Association of North-east Asian Cultures]
  • 설립연도
    2000
  • 분야
    복합학>학제간연구
  • 소개
    동북아시아 문화의 다양성과 정체성을 연구 토론하고, 지역내 문화 교류의 다양한 모습을 연구하고 문화변동의 큰 틀을 집적함으로써 우리 민족 문화 및 상대 민족의 문화적 터전을 이해하여 문화공동체적 특성을 계발하고 상호 관련성의 강화를 유도하는 학술활동을 통해 동북아시아의 문화발전에 이바지함.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    동북아 문화연구 [Journal of North-east Asian Cultures]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1598-3692
  • 수록기간
    2001~2026
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 910 DDC 950

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 동북아 문화연구 제61집

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장