Earticle

초록

영어

Recently, there have been debates to whom the premium based on the management right of a corporation must be vested in. In other words, the main focus of this study is that only a dominant stockholder who exerts the management right can have a control of the corporation, or the affiliate parties, who assisted the dominant stockholder in stably acquiring the management right, are also allowed to enjoy the premium of the management right. With regard to the topic, recent judicial precedents exhibited two conflicting perspectives. For instance, the Seoul High Court(SHC2016Noo40490, 2017.03.08.) and the Supreme Court(SC2017Doo40228, 2017.07.27.) have taken a position that only a dominant stockholder can enjoy the premium of the management right, whereas the National Tax Tribunal(NTI 2014 Seo 288, 2014.10.29.) and the Seoul Administrative Court(SAC2015GooHab52302, 2016.03.18.) have presented that not only a dominant stockholder but also the affiliate parties could be a beneficiary of the premium of the management right. As such, this study aims to investigate the logical grounds of each party based on the precedents mentioned above and to analyze which opinion is theoretically or logically more relevant than others. The premium of the management right is inevitably derived from the process of various mergers and acquisitions(M&A) recently occurred among corporations. In considering these realities, it would be definitely worth to organize and analyze the legal issues with regard to the premium of the management right. Meanwhile, the results of this study would be used as useful ground data for the authorities, which have many concerns on the tax issues associated with the premium of the management right, to regulate or revise the tax policies or regulations.

목차

Abstract
I. Introduction
II. Details of Court Decrees
1. Case Overview
2. Controversial Issues of the Case
3. Court Decrees of Seoul Administrative Court(The First Trial)
4. Court Decrees by the Seoul High Court(the Second Trial)
5. Court Decrees by the Supreme Court(The Third Trial)
III. Annotation of Precedents
1. Nature of Management Right
2. Premium of the Management Right in Capital Market
3. Assessment on Stocks of a dominant stockholder and its affiliates in terms of the Inheritance and Gift Tax Act
4. Ownership of a Premium of the Managemeπt Right
IV. Conclusion
References
요약

키워드

저자

• Park, Sung-Jin [ 박성진 | Assistant Professor, Department of Business Administration, Sungshin Women's University ] First Author
• Sun, Eun Jung [ 선은정 | Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Hannam University ] Corresponding Author

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  경영컨설팅연구 [Korean Management Consulting Review]

• 간기

  격월간

• pISSN

  1598-172X

• eISSN

  3059-0469

• 수록기간

  2001~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 325 DDC 658