The official position of the Japanese government on Dokdo, Korea's indigenous territory, is that Takeshima (Dokdo) is Japan's inherent territory even in international law and international law. It is an illegal occupation and there is no legal justification for any action taken on Dokdo. On the other hand, the Korean government counters that 'the beautiful island of Korea, Dokdo is historically, geographically and international law, and is a unique territory of Korea. Summarizing the arguments for Korea's and Japan's claim to Dokdo, there are three different views. It is a matter of correct interpretation of historical ancient documents. It is a matter of legality of territorial incorporation by Japanese government in 1905. This is a matter of validity against the Peace Treaty and a series of measures. Because Japan's logic on the Dokdo issue is very sophisticated and detailed, Dokdo is likely to be interpreted in the international community as Japan's territory unless it systematically contradicts Japan's logic of ownership of Dokdo. Therefore, it is necessary to review historical rights and relevant facts and international legal debates on Dokdo between Korea and Japan. We should consider how to solve the Dokdo issue in reality. What means exist for resolving the Dokdo dispute between Korea and Japan? The Korean side considers the Dokdo dispute a political one and will not appeal the Japanese's ICJ complaint. How can we solve this problem by identifying Japanese lies and Korean truths? It is clear that this is our national task.
목차
1. 독도영유권은 누구에 있는가 1) 역사적 고문헌 자료의 올바른 해석문제이다. 2) 1905년 일본정부에 의한 영토편입 조치의 합법성 문제이다. 3) 대일강화조약 및 일련의 조치에 대한 효력문제이다. 2. 독도문제의 해결수단은 있는가 Abstract
동북아시아문화학회 [The Association of North-east Asian Cultures]
설립연도
2000
분야
복합학>학제간연구
소개
동북아시아 문화의 다양성과 정체성을 연구 토론하고, 지역내 문화 교류의 다양한 모습을 연구하고 문화변동의 큰 틀을 집적함으로써 우리 민족 문화 및 상대 민족의 문화적 터전을 이해하여 문화공동체적 특성을 계발하고 상호 관련성의 강화를 유도하는 학술활동을 통해 동북아시아의 문화발전에 이바지함.