Earticle

현재 위치 Home

保险判例解决路径及方法研究 - 以一则被保险人醉驾死亡赔付争议案件为例
A study on the solution path and method of insurance precedents - taking a case of the insured drunk driving death compensation dispute as an example

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    원광대학교 법학연구소 바로가기
  • 간행물
    원광법학 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제35집 제3호 (2019.09)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.299-319
  • 저자
    潘红艳
  • 언어
    중국어(CHI)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A363339

원문정보

초록

영어
The motor vehicle driver (the insured) because of drunk driving accident and cause their own death, the insured's heirs and insurance company between the litigation dispute. In case analysis, insurance practice, insurance judicial dispute and insurance legal interpretation are interwoven, and the judicial function is the guide. The process of analysis forms four logical planes of multi-dimensional thinking: the logical plane of academic theory advancing, the logical plane of judicature advancing, the logical plane of evidence facts advancing and the logical plane of thinking connecting three logical planes. The specific process is as follows: extracting the core facts of the case and obtaining the preferred solution; interpreting article 45 of the insurance law and its judicial interpretation; examining the promotion process of the theory based on judicial functions; conducting judicial big data analysis; exploring other solutions to the case. Of intentional crime "the insured" two levels of judgment in the judicial process is succeeded and results in common: the judge's judgment is derived from the parties (including the attorney) of the parties to the case facts and evidence reveals that the judge based on the judgment of referees and through the verdict of the cognitive degree and be able to confirm or deny.
중국어
机动车驾驶员(被保险人)由于醉酒驾车肇事而导致自己死亡,被保险人的继承人与保险公司之间发生的诉讼纠纷。案件分析时将保险实践、保险司法争议、保险法律解释交织,并以司法功能为导向进行。分析过程形成多维立体思维的四个逻辑面:学理推进逻辑面,司法推进逻辑面,证据事实推进逻辑面及三个逻辑面的思维连接逻辑面。具体过程为:萃取本案核心事实并获得首选方案、解读《保险法》第45条及其司法解释、以司法功能为导向检视学理推进过程、进行司法大数据分析、探查本案的其他解决路径。对“被保险人故意犯罪”的两个层次的论断在司法审判过程中是接续进行和结果共通的:法官的判断源自于当事人(包括当事人的代理律师)对案件事实、证据的揭示,法官在判断基础上进行的裁判又通过判决结果的当事人认知程度而得以确认或否定。

목차

摘要
引言
案情简介
一、保险判例的多维立体思维方式
二、本案核心事实的萃取及首选方案
三、《保险法》第45条及其司法解释的解读及司法适用
三、司法功能导向对学理推进过程的推进
四、本案的司法大数据分析
参考文献
ABSTRACT

키워드

judicial function orientation highly probable insured intentional crime 司法功能导向 高度概然 被保险人故意犯罪

저자

  • 潘红艳 [ 반홍염 | 吉林大学法学院 副教授 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    원광대학교 법학연구소 [THE LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE WONKWANG UNIVERSTIY]
  • 설립연도
    1961
  • 분야
    사회과학>법학
  • 소개
    법에 대한 이론적 · 실제적 연구를 수행하고 그 결과를 발표하여 한국과 지역사회의 법률문화의 발전에 기여함을 목적으로 설립되었으며 법학일반이론과 법학교육방법 등의 연구와 법률구조안내 및 상담을 한다

간행물

  • 간행물명
    원광법학 [Journal of Law research]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1598-429X
  • eISSN
    2508-4526
  • 수록기간
    1962~2026
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 360 DDC 340

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 원광법학 제35집 제3호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장