원효의 『涅槃宗要』에 나타난 보신의 상주론과 무상론의 화쟁방식 - <和諍門>의 분석을 중심으로
The Way of Harmonizing the Disputes between the Discourses of Permanence and Impermanence of Saṃbhogakya Shown in the Essentials of the Nirvana Sutra - Focusing on the Analysis of <The Gate of Harmonizing the Disputes> 원효의 『열반종요』에 나타난 보신의 상주론과 무상론의 화쟁방식 - <화쟁문>의 분석을 중심으로
Wonhyo(元曉, 617-686) is harmonizing the disputes between the permanence and impermanence of the Body of Bliss(Saṃbhogakya) in an epistemological way, such as ‘being called as permanent because it is ultimately serene’, and ‘being called as impermanent because it can act anything with its dynamic movement.’ It is an inclusive theory of harmony corresponding to the middle, without sticking to one’s position, as the opposite method of Anaikntika-viruddhâvyabhicrin or Reductio ad absurdum which deduces ‘the two propositions and reasons being mutually conflicting whatever position one may follow.’ Yet, not only the method of ‘synthesizing or harmonizing the opposing perspectives’, but the logic of ‘deducing affirmation through negation’ which encompasses prasaṅga, dilemma or a fait accompli are also employed. Adversely, it comprehensively synthesizes all views from the aspects of non-duality of dharmata(性) and characteristics of all things(相) after co-relating the theory of permanence in the line of dharmat with the theory of impermanence in the line of all characteristics. It manifests bi-directional structure of open logic whether it places dharmat or characteristics as its subject. Further, it also analyzes the way of harmonizing with Buddhavacana, which was understood in the context of the true nature of things(dharmat) and logical principle (yukti). Seen from the aspects of the secret mark of Buddha, it is expressed as the 4th koṭi, in that it transcends both of the characteristics and dharmat. Meanwhile, from the aspects of the negation of both, it is expressed as the 3rd koṭi in the sense that these two positions are not different. Likewise, it manifests a theory of circulation of meaning in its way of harmonizing the disputes. Through this method, it reduces dharmat and characteristics to the non-dual middle way while creating the infinite meaning through intersecting affirmation and negation.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 Ⅱ. 보신 상주론과 무상론 제1장. 보신 상주론의 입장 제2장. 보신 무상론의 입장 Ⅲ. 보신 상주론과 무상론의 화쟁 제1장. 제4구를 통한 화쟁 방식 제2장. 보신 무상론에 대한 원효의 문답 제3장. 상주론에 대한 원효의 문답 Ⅳ. 결론 참고문헌 논문초록
키워드
원효화쟁방식보신상주론보신무상론성상불이(性相不異)WonhyoMethod of harmonizing the disputesDiscourse of ‘permanence of the body of Bliss’(Saṃbhogakya)Discourse of ‘impermanence of the body of Bliss’Non-duality of dharmat and characteristics of all things
동북아시아문화학회 [The Association of North-east Asian Cultures]
설립연도
2000
분야
복합학>학제간연구
소개
동북아시아 문화의 다양성과 정체성을 연구 토론하고, 지역내 문화 교류의 다양한 모습을 연구하고 문화변동의 큰 틀을 집적함으로써 우리 민족 문화 및 상대 민족의 문화적 터전을 이해하여 문화공동체적 특성을 계발하고 상호 관련성의 강화를 유도하는 학술활동을 통해 동북아시아의 문화발전에 이바지함.