Earticle

초록

영어

There were no cases of re-certification of school facilities until G-SEED ver.2016 because there were no separate criteria for re-certification of school facilities and no institutional guidelines. Therefore, it did not meet the purpose of the certification system, known as the sustainable development throughout buildings life cycle. The most important feature of the G-SEED ver.2016 is that the criteria are divided into those for new and existing buildings. Therefore, buildings assessed on new certificates can be recertified in accordance with the ‘G-SEED for Existing Buildings’ when their five-year certification expires. In this study, the users and managers of school facilities that acquired green building certification were investigated for a post-occupancy evaluation and on-site verification was conducted to verify the performance of eco-friendly buildings. The contents of the survey examined the perception of G-SEED and issues of satisfaction and maintenance in seven professional accreditation categories. This study aims to suggest improvements in the criteria for certification of the G-SEED for School Facility.

목차

Abstract
 Ⅰ. 서론
  1. 연구 배경 및 목적
  2. 연구 범위 및 절차
 Ⅱ. G-SEED ver.2016
  1. 녹색건축인증제도 개정
  2. 학교시설의 녹색건축인증 현황
 Ⅲ. 학교시설의 사후평가
  1. 사후평가 대상 학교 건물의 개요
  2. 학교시설 현황 조사 및 사후평가
 Ⅳ. 결론
 연구의 한계 및 제언
 참고문헌

키워드

저자

• 박정란 [ Park, Joung-lan | 동양미래대학교 건축과 조교수 ] 주저자(교신저자)

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  청소년시설환경 [YOUTH FACILITY AND ENVIRONMENT ; Journal of the Korea Institute of Youth Facility and Environment]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1738-0170

• 수록기간

  2003~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 334 DDC 361