Earticle

초록

영어

South Korean government has taken Asymmetric development strategy focusing on ‘selection and concentration’. Unbalanced growth theory (Hirschman & Nurkse, 1953) has been taken due to the lack of financial resources for economic development in 1960s and 70s. Focused investments were made in specific regions, which had development potential, in order to maximize national economic growth. In other word, economic growth was prioritized rather than distribution. South Korean government expected ‘spill-over effect’, which means that profits of economic development in a region will flow into other backward regions. However, current data supports a hypothesis that economic divide in South Korea has been deepened during external currency crisis in 1997 and international financial crisis in 2008. Spill-over effect might hardly happen, even though the most of economic policies in South Korea are designed expecting it. On the contrary, it has been noticed that disparity in economic power between regions are growing worse due to the absorption of capital and human resources. First, this research identifies problems of the polarized and overcrowded capital region. Also, it makes alternative proposals in order to the competitiveness of the capital region and win-win situation with non-capital regions.

목차

< Abstract >
 Ⅰ. 서론
  1. 균형발전에 대한 연구범위
  2. 지역개발에 관한 선행연구
 Ⅱ. 우리나라 수도권 정비 시책 변천 현황
  1. 우리나라 수도권시책 도입현황
  2. 수도권 과밀개선 규제정책 도입
  3. 정부의 수도권정책의 목표와 수단
  4. 우리나라 수도권 과밀 규제의 현행제도
  5. 정부의 과밀 해소 대책
 Ⅲ. 주요국의 수도권 규제관련 동향
  1. 일본의 수도권 정책
  2. 영국의 수도권 정책
  3. 프랑스의 수도권정책
  4. 각국 수도권정책 시사점
 Ⅳ. 현 우리나라 수도권 규제에 따른 문제점
  1. 수도권 규제로 파생된 문제
  2. 수도권 인구집중 문제
  3. 수도권 30년 규제 후 누적문제
 Ⅴ. 결론 : 수도권 경쟁력 향상을 위한 정책 대안
 <참고문헌>

키워드

저자

• 정태식 [ Jyoung, Tae- Shik | 부동산학박사/부동산 글로벌연구소장 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  부동산경영 [Journal of the Korea Real Estate Management Review]

• 간기

  반년간

• pISSN

  2288-7393

• eISSN

  2713-8984

• 수록기간

  2010~2025

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 321 DDC 330