Earticle

현재 위치 Home

스토파드 극에 나타난 영화적 기법
The Cinematic Techniques in Stoppard’s Plays

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    21세기영어영문학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    영어영문학21 KCI 등재 바로가기
  • 통권
    제31권 1호 (2018.03)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.1-30
  • 저자
    윤정용
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A326935

원문정보

초록

영어
Tom Stoppard’s interest in cinema started long before he began writing plays, and has exercised a far-reaching influence on his playwriting. Therefore, it is very important to study the cinematic elements in his plays to examine the world of Stoppard’s works. On one hand, he brought an exact sense of sophisticated dialogue from theater into film. On the other hand, he brought an exact sense of structuring scenes from film into theater. In other words, he took good advantage of cinematic techniques to enhance his plays. Likewise, he instilled theatrical elements into his films. In short, to Stoppard, theater and film are not separate and different, but interdependent and coexistent. In Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, Stoppard made the minor roles Rosencrantz and Guildenstern into main characters and reproduced dramatic events which are not enacted in Hamlet. Ultimately, he opposed the conventional world of Hamlet by reading and understanding the play from a different angle, and thereby questioned unquestionable universal truth. In Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead, Stoppard did not subvert Hamlet so as to destroy the dramatic narrative and point out the unjustifiable sacrifice of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. As stated earlier, what he intended to subvert is not so much Shakespeare himself as the unquestioned cultural and political authority granted tests such as Shakespeare’s. Stoppard’s textual revisions from a different viewpoint are consistent themes of Stoppard’s works. He makes good use of cinematic techniques to represent those alternative viewpoints effectively. Arcadia, which is hailed as Stoppard’s most brilliant and fascinating play, is not only a story of two contemporary researchers who try to find out what really happened in Sidley Park, but also an intellectual discourse about a variety of scientific, mathematical, and philosophical arguments. In Arcadia, Stoppard uses two different historical periods to elaborate plots and demonstrate that it is impossible to know what happened using fragments of the past. Arcadia abounds in contrasting or symmetrical characters. Through the symmetrical characters, he does not overtly show his own opinion of “who is right” or “who is wrong.” Instead, he metaphorically describes the modern world where there exist various ideas. He not only fosters audiences’ or readers’ dramatic interest but also stimulates their intellectual curiosity through contrasting, versatile ideas. The real intention of Stoppard’s writing is not to intentionally lead audiences or readers to disorder but to show them the diversity of our world where versatile theories are mixed with confusing human relations.

목차

I. 스토파드와 영화
 II. 로 젠크렌츠와 길덴스턴은 죽었다 : 공간의 병치
 III. 아 카디아 : 과거와 현재의 대칭
 IV. 결론
 인용문헌
 Abstract

키워드

Tom Stoppard Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead Arcadia creative transformation symmetry cinematic techniques

저자

  • 윤정용 [ Jeongyong Yoon | 고려대학교 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    21세기영어영문학회 [The 21st Century Association of English Language and Literature]
  • 설립연도
    1967
  • 분야
    인문학>영어와문학
  • 소개
    영어영문학과 관련된 학술지의 발간, 학술발표회의 개최 및 강좌 개설, 영어영문학 관련 도서 및 자료의 출판, 해외 학술교류 등의 학술연구활동을 수행할 목적으로 설립되었다.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    영어영문학21 [English21]
  • 간기
    계간
  • pISSN
    1738-4052
  • 수록기간
    1967~2025
  • 등재여부
    KCI 등재
  • 십진분류
    KDC 840 DDC 820

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 영어영문학21 제31권 1호

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장