The link of government procurement services of public officials into private or public companies is very vulnerable to causing bureaucratic corruption. Therefore many countries are constantly revising and perfecting the procurement law so as to prevent corruption. This paper compares the government procurement laws and related ordinances between China and South Korea. In order to achieve this goal, we investigate the differences between the two countries based on the five aspects: basic theory divided into purpose, definitions and scope; incentives to encouragement and bonus; procurement details in the area of quality management, statistics, derivatives trading, contract, price payment, and fines for negligence, etc.; stockpile commodities; and supervision link composed of questions and complaints, and legal liability instructions. Through a comparative analysis, we found four major differences in the aspects of incentives, procurement ways, legal description or specific implementation details, stockpile commodities, and supervision link, except for the basic theory. Therefore this paper have made four policy suggestions: improving incentive system; making obvious legal instructions; introducing derivatives trading including diversified procurement methods; and improving the system of fees and fines. The aim of this article is to absorb the advantages of the Korean government procurement law so as to make useful suggestions for the Chinese government, and therefore revise the government procurement law of China.
목차
Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Literature Review and Analytic Framework 2.1 Literature Review 2.2 Framework for Analysis of this paper 3. A Comparison on the Procurement Policies between two Countries 3.1 Basic Theory 3.2 Related incentives 3.3 Procurement details 3.4 Stockpile commodities 3.5 Supervision link 4. Differences between the Two Countries 4.1 Incentives 4.2 Procuring ways 4.3 legal description or implementation details 4.4 Procurement staff 5. Suggestions for the Revision of Chinese Government Procurement Law 5.1 Incentives 5.2 Making a legal scope clear 5.3 Improvement on the fees 5.4 Considering about derivatives trading 6. Conclusion Reference
부산대학교 중국전략연구소(구 부산대학교 중국연구소) [Institute of China Strategy]
설립연도
2006
분야
사회과학>사회복지학
소개
본 연구소의 설립을 통해 우선 한중 양국 국민의 상호이해와 교류증진을 위한 인문, 사회과학적인 연구는 물론이고, 이를 통해 기업(인)이 중국에 안정적인 정착과 교류를 할 수 있는 각종 환경을 조성하고자 한다.
게다가 본 연구소는 기존의 연구소의 기능과는 달리 단순한 학술 교류에 머물지 않고 인적 교류를 통해 양국관계의 이해를 증진하고 나아가 한국과 중국의 각종 프로젝트를 적극 유치, 개발함으로써 지속적으로 재원의 창출을 도모하고자 한다.