Earticle

현재 위치 Home

第 12 分科

日本 海軍의 해도와 『한국수산지』의 海圖와의 비교
Comparison between Nautical Charts of the Japanese Navy and those on Korean Fishery Chronicle
일본 해군의 해도와 『한국수산지』의 해도와의 비교

첫 페이지 보기
  • 발행기관
    동북아시아문화학회 바로가기
  • 간행물
    동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 바로가기
  • 통권
    제33차 동아시아일본학회・동북아시아문학학회 2016년 추계연합국제학술대회 (2016.10)바로가기
  • 페이지
    pp.456-461
  • 저자
    서경순
  • 언어
    한국어(KOR)
  • URL
    https://www.earticle.net/Article/A322242

※ 원문제공기관과의 협약기간이 종료되어 열람이 제한될 수 있습니다.

원문정보

초록

영어
In the mid-19th century, Japan became the target of survey for its coast by the Western powers, and the Shogunate regime strongly resisted it but in vain. Japan's Meiji government, recognizing the importance of coastal survey, established Eoyonggwae at the Ministry of the Military in 1869 (Meiji 2nd year) to promote waterway survey project. At the time, Japan was not able to prepare nautical charts even for its own coasts and near seas by itself and so began the survey in collaboration with British destroyer HMS Sylvia in 1870. In 1871, Department of Navy was established at the Ministry of the Military together with Office of Waterways. The following year, the Ministry of Navy was established, while Office of Waterways was renamed Department of Waterways in 1886. This Department played a key role in making maps and charts for foreign countries called Oebangdo. In 1875, Japan's gunboat Unyo, approaching Ganghwa Island in Joseon, provoked Joseon's firing, eventually leading to the country's opening. And this time, the ostensible purpose of the boat's sailing was to survey Joseon's coasts. As Japan accepted the demand for survey by Britain and the United States, which was based on public law of all nations, Japan likewise approached Joseon's coast following the logic of the Western powers and conducted survey arbitrarily. And some nautical charts were inserted in several parts of Korean Fishery Chronicle(Hankuk Susanji). Comparing nautical charts inserted in Volume 3 of this Chronicle with nautical chart No. 320 of the Japanese navy, this study found that while there was no difference in borderlines of coast, the latter described the landform of coasts - observable from the seashore - in details whereas the former described the related landform very simply. Perhaps, it's because as nautical charts were principally related with military information, the producer of the nautical charts might have judged it was not proper to contain such information in Korean Fishery Chronicle read by ordinary people.

목차

1. 머리말
 2. 조선 바다의 측량
 3. 『한국수산지』의 해도
 4. 맺음말
 

저자

  • 서경순 [ 부경대 박사과정 ]

참고문헌

자료제공 : 네이버학술정보

간행물 정보

발행기관

  • 발행기관명
    동북아시아문화학회 [The Association of North-east Asian Cultures]
  • 설립연도
    2000
  • 분야
    복합학>학제간연구
  • 소개
    동북아시아 문화의 다양성과 정체성을 연구 토론하고, 지역내 문화 교류의 다양한 모습을 연구하고 문화변동의 큰 틀을 집적함으로써 우리 민족 문화 및 상대 민족의 문화적 터전을 이해하여 문화공동체적 특성을 계발하고 상호 관련성의 강화를 유도하는 학술활동을 통해 동북아시아의 문화발전에 이바지함.

간행물

  • 간행물명
    동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 [國際學術大會]
  • 간기
    반년간
  • 수록기간
    ~2022
  • 십진분류
    KDC 910 DDC 950

이 권호 내 다른 논문 / 동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 제33차 동아시아일본학회・동북아시아문학학회 2016년 추계연합국제학술대회

    피인용수 : 0(자료제공 : 네이버학술정보)

    함께 이용한 논문 이 논문을 다운로드한 분들이 이용한 다른 논문입니다.

      페이지 저장