Earticle

초록

영어

The Public Engagement Commission on Spent Nuclear Fuel Management decided to collect public opinion in order to increase social receptivity of Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Policy. Established in October 2013, the Commission, determined to lead the public opinion from an independent position from the government, and advise the government based on the public opinion. Meanwhile, separate from the Commission, the Special Committee of the Communities that has a nuclear power plant] promoted their project that collects the public opinion by appointing a special institution in each five region. It is quite promising to accomplish its goal of collecting public opinion on Sepnt Nuclear Fuel management as one of the procedures of democracy, “public interest defense,” as shown at public survey result in Gijang-gun. However, if its ultimate goal is self-assessment of the risk, suggesting solutions, and participating in the decision making process, it seems difficult to achieve its goal because the field of nuclear fuel management requires expertise. The survey result shows that although the discussion succeeded in delivering information, it failed to form sympathy, due to the antipathy for collecting public opinion result from the late attempt, misunderstanding of the intension, lack of government’s strong willingness and so on. At the survey and discussion during the procedure of collecting public opinion on spent nuclear fuel management, local residents asked for reliability in nuclear energy policy and responsible attitude of the government. Above all, the most residents claimed that the government and K-water has failed to carry out their promises while speaking out the damage caused by the nuclear faculty in their community over the past forty years. In addition, the residents insisted that the health and safety of the local residents are the top priorities. Lastly, they asked government to establish a plan for permanent disposal of spent nuclear fuel as soon as possible. Both public and the principal agent of collecting public opinion have agreed on the fact that spent nuclear fuel management is a conundrum. It is essential to have such bond of sympathy and seek increasing reliability in government policy.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 공론화의 이론적 이해
  1. 공론화의 배경과 목적
  2. 연구방법
 Ⅲ. 공론화의 수행과정
 Ⅳ. 공론화의 결과
  1. 주민 간담회 결과
  2. 주민 설문조사 결과
 Ⅴ. 공론화의 성과와 한계
 Ⅵ. 결론
 참고문헌
 

저자

• 정해조 [ Chung, Hae-Jo | 부경대 국제지역학부 교수 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  동북아시아문화학회 국제학술대회 [國際學術大會]

• 간기

  반년간

• 수록기간

  ~2022

• 십진분류

  KDC 910 DDC 950