Earticle

초록

영어

The economic value and socio-cultural value of specialized buildings have a great impact. The value of aesthetic architectural design led to the creation of added value such as an increase in the value of assets and an increase in the number of foreign tourists and visitors. Therefore, many countries and cities have made great efforts to make urban image making through specialized buildings. But exceptional architecture starts with designers with creative and technically superior competencies. If the designer's competence and the legal system and regulations to support it do not have the triple digits, excellent architecture will not be able to see the light of the world. If you do not have all the details such as purpose of construction design, specialization plan, space plan, and related regulations and technical review to be presented to the participants for the design competition, you should not select ‘work’, select ‘person’. The purpose of this study is to find out the problems and find alternatives through the case of Nakdong River Eco Center. In the case of the Nakdong River Eco Center, the design process based on the elected design was not able to be constructed according to the design of the wooden material according to the law. The problems at the Nakdong River Eco Center International Design Competition can be summarized as follows. First of all, it is a problem in the operation process such as making design guidelines by non-experts. If the relevant laws and regulations were thoroughly reviewed and the design guidelines for the public offering were made and presented after the technical review was completed, the design using wood would not have been submitted in the first place. Next is the unilateral process of design change. If design changes were inevitable due to the restriction of related laws, designers need to be actively involved in the design change so as not to undermine the design philosophy and concept of the designer. If public buildings built with enormous cost can not match the original philosophy and function, it can also be a social loss. In this study, the following three alternatives were proposed for a more efficient and high-level operation plan of the international architectural design contest. First, it is necessary to secure the public power by including the regulations on the drafting of the guidelines for the international architectural design competition, which is based on actual construction, in the ‘Building Service Industry Promotion Act’. Second, the level of awareness of stakeholders is enhanced through education. Third, it is necessary to build an integrated database for the international architectural design competition and to build a system that manages already completed projects, present and planned projects as a whole. In accordance with the WTO opening principle of architectural design market, the domestic architectural design market is also in need of in-depth discussion and research on the planning and operation of architectural competition in accordance with global standards and guidelines.

목차

Abstract
 1. 서론
  1.1. 연구의 배경과 목적
  1.2 연구의 대상과 방법
 2. 선행연구 검토
  2.1 건축설계공모전에 관한 선행연구
  2.2 설계공모의 활성화를 위한 법과 제도
 3. 낙동강 에코센터 국제건축설계공모전의 문제점
  3.1 UIA승인 국제건축공모전의 현황과 문제점
  3.2 낙동강 에코센터 국제건축설계공모전
 4. 국제건축설계공모전 운영의 개선방향
 5. 결론
 REFERENCES

키워드

저자

• 강병준 [ Kang, Byeong-Joon | 인제대학교 건축학과 부교수, 건축학석사 ] Corresponding author

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  대한건축학회연합논문집 [Journal of the Regional Association of Architectural Institute of Korea]

• 간기

  격월간

• pISSN

  1229-5752

• 수록기간

  1999~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 540 DDC 690