This paper argues, contrary to what is widely observed in the literature, that (i) shika ‘only’ in adjunct position, Indeterminate-mo (dare-mo/nani-mo/dokoni-mo 'anyone/anything/anywhere'), 1-Classifiermo( hitori-mo/hitotsu-mo, etc ‘even a person/ even a thing’)’, kessite ‘never’ in Japanese must be categorized as an Negative Concord Item (NCI) and that (ii) a diagnostic test to distinguish an NCI should be added to 5 diagnostic tests, that is, ‘ability to co-occur with other NCIs in the same negative clause’. In past studies, it has been widely accepted that shika, Indeterminate-mo, 1-Classifier-mo, kessite should be categorized as an NPI based on Klima(1964)’s analysis on English NPI anyone/anything/any-where. Assuming that their analyses were correct, they cannot explain that why dare-mo/nani-mo/dokoni-mo in Japanese syntactically behave quite differently from anyone/anything/ anywhere in English in the following 5 properties : a. Ability to appear in non negative contexts, b. Ability to appear in pre-verbal position, c. Ability to be modified by expressions like almost, d. Ability to be used as an elliptical answer, e. Clause-boundedness. In fact, according to Watanabe(2004), an NCI must have the above 5 properties and this fact shows that Indeterminate-mo, 1-Classifier-mo should be categorized as not an NPI but an NCI. This paper aruges that besides Indeterminate-mo, 1-Classifier-mo, shika in adjunct position and kessite have properties as an NCI. Furthermore, this paper argues that an NCI should co-occur with other NCIs in the same clause.
본 한국일본학회는 일본관련 학회로는 1973년에 한국 최초로 성립되어 2015년 3월 현재 가입회원수 기준 1000여명에 달하는 방대한 학회로 발전하였다. 본 학회는 일본어학 및 일본학은 물론,일본의교육,사상,역사,민속 등 일본학 전반에 걸친 연구와 한일간의 일본학 전반에 걸친 비교 연구를 대상으로 하는 학회로서 회원들의 연구기회 제공과 정보의 교류를 주된 목표로 하고 있다. 분회 발표를 포함하여 매년 20회 가까운 학술발표회와 국제학술대회를 개최 함으로서 발표 기회의 제공과 함께 회원 상호간의 친목 도모의 장으로도 활용하며 건전한 학회발전을 지향하고 있다.