Earticle

초록

영어

This paper argues, contrary to what is widely accepted in the literature, that shika ‘only’ in Japanese has two different features based on the syntactic positions. In other words, shika in the argument positions syntactically behaves different from shika in the non-argument positions. This can be seen from the fact that the former is able to co-occur with other Negative Polarity Items (NPIs) such as Indeterminate-mo (dare-mo/nani-mo/dokoni-mo ‘anyone/anything/anywhere’) or kessite ‘never’ in the same clause, whereas the latter is not able to do. It is well known that shika is one of Toritate focalizers such as mo ‘also’, sae ‘even’ or dake ‘only’ etc and it can be followed by noun phrases such as nominative or accusative, inherent case markers such as kara ‘from’, de ‘in’ or to ‘with’ etc, adverbs, sentential verbs, te form, quotational clause and koto clause. In past studies, it has been widely observed that shika is categorized into a single type regardless of whether or not it is followed by. Assuming that their analyses were correct, they cannot explain that why shika which is followed by a nominative/accusative noun cannot occur with other NPIs in the same clause, whereas shika which is followed by inherent case markers, adverbs, sentential verbs, te form, quotational clause and koto clause can. This shows us that (i) shika in the argument positions is different from one in the non-argument positions and that (ii) shika should be categorized into at least two types in terms of the syntactic positions.

목차

ABSTRACT
 0. はじめに
 1. 先行研究と問題の所在
 2. 二種類の「しか」
  2.1 多重NPI構文
 3. まとめ
 參考文献

키워드

저자

• 朴江訓 [ 박강훈 | 筑波大学 博士課程 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  일본학보 [The Korean Journal of Japanology]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1225-1453

• 수록기간

  1973~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 913 DDC 952