Earticle

초록

영어

The civil execution is based on the co-acting force and emphasizes the struggle thinking in the process of implementation. However, simply relying on coercion can not solve the various difficulties encountered in the implementation of the work. Therefore, the implementation of conciliation system arises at the historic moment, which not only alleviated the severity of the effective legal documents, but also helped safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of the litigants and enhance the credibility of the judiciary. However, there are five deficiencies in the implementation of conciliation system in the process of operation, such as the unclear position of judges, the absence of relief mode, the ineffectiveness of the comprised agreement, the non-standard procedures of reconciliation procedures, and the imperfection of disciplinary system in violation of the agreement, which needs further improvement.

중국어

民事执行工作以强制力为基础，在实施过程中强调斗争性思维。然而，单纯依靠强制无法解决执行工作中遇到的各类难题。由此，执行和解制度应运而生，不仅缓和了生效法律文书的严苛性，还有利于维护当事人合法权益、增强司法公信力。不过，执行和解制度在运行过程中却存在法官定位不明、救济模式缺位、和解协议效力不确定、和解程序操作不规范、违反协议的惩戒制度不完善等五个层面的制度缺陷，有待进一步完善。

목차

摘要
 一、问题的缘起
 二、对J区法院民事执行和解案件的统计分析
 三、制度运行中存在的问题
 四、执行和解制度的完善路径
 참고문헌
 ABSTRACT

키워드

저자

• 武翠丹 [ 무취단 | 西南政法大学民商法学院讲师 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  원광법학 [Journal of Law research]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-429X

• eISSN

  2508-4526

• 수록기간

  1962~2026

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 360 DDC 340