Sino-Indian Border Conflict was spread in the border war in 1962. This war first of all was connected with the linear boundary concept. Since 19th century, British-ruled India and Qing dynasty, and the himalayan states tried to set up or resist the line. Especially British-ruled India had leaded the new trend. The main problem was the question of title to a number of 'no-man's lands' and buffer zone. After Sino-Indian establishment and Independence, there was the western sector(Aksai Chin) and the middle sector and the eastern sector(the McMahon Line) in Sino-Indian Border. The border war of 1962 was the dispute of Aksai Chin region and the McMahon Line region. This war also was connected the game of geopolitics. The grand design of geopolitics in India was derived from British-ruled India' heritage. A case of China, it was derived from the experiences of Qing dynasty. Especially the Tibet perception of Sino-Indian leaders was differant. The complete loss of Tibet was a loss of a buffer zone and friend. Without Tibet, India and Chian was hard to maitain some friendship for many Indians. The "forward" policy of India in 1960s was derived from this background. The linear boundary concept has already been a common sence. On the other hand, the interchange between nation and nation is largely increasing in the era of globalization. Today, the relationship of India and China is improving. But the experience of the conflict and differant Tibet perceptions still exist. And in china the nationalistic Strategy as 'Western Great Development' is going on. This situation means the international interests is important as the national interests.
목차
1. 머리말 2. 중국 인민해방군의 티베트 점령과 중·인 국경 분쟁의 배경 3. 중·인 국경분쟁의 내용과 결과 4. 맺음말 Abstract
동북아시아문화학회 [The Association of North-east Asian Cultures]
설립연도
2000
분야
복합학>학제간연구
소개
동북아시아 문화의 다양성과 정체성을 연구 토론하고, 지역내 문화 교류의 다양한 모습을 연구하고 문화변동의 큰 틀을 집적함으로써 우리 민족 문화 및 상대 민족의 문화적 터전을 이해하여 문화공동체적 특성을 계발하고 상호 관련성의 강화를 유도하는 학술활동을 통해 동북아시아의 문화발전에 이바지함.