The point of state-oriented research on labor policy is as follows ; First, labor law system is diverse in accordance with the degree of capitalist states' development. Second, every individuals or states must not share the same values. Third, labor related strife is not about a fact, but about a thought. Fourth, interpretation of legal system changes depending on the position of individuals or states. Therefore to understand the labor policy requires more than mere numerating chronology of accidents, or stating who did what to whom. It requires the answer to following questions ; First, historical background. Second, societal and practical demand that the relation between capital and labor be settled rationally. Third, progressionists' demand that legal system revise the order of capitalism. Fourth, the character of autonomous law that capital and labor should be based on the equal principle. And interpretation of above all should be followed. However it is impossible to interpret sufficiently. It is because we need to get interested in theory. Of course theory has different forms, but it's purpose is to fit into a logical frame a series of ideas connected each other in order to state, explain and predict the phenomena. The theoretical frame also organizes our thoughts about accidents. Keeping the above importance of theory in mind, this study is to point out the problems of previous interpretation on the Japanese system of labor law before World War II and to analyze new theories objectively.
목차
1. 서론 2. 노동통제법제 평가의 문제와 새로운 이론도입 2.1 노동통제법제 평가의 문제점 2.2 새로운 이론의 도입 3. 전전 노동법제의 분화와 통합 4. 결론 참고문헌 Abstract
키워드
법 체제역사적 배경연속분화통합Legal systemHistorical backgroundContinuationSpecialization Unify
동북아시아문화학회 [The Association of North-east Asian Cultures]
설립연도
2000
분야
복합학>학제간연구
소개
동북아시아 문화의 다양성과 정체성을 연구 토론하고, 지역내 문화 교류의 다양한 모습을 연구하고 문화변동의 큰 틀을 집적함으로써 우리 민족 문화 및 상대 민족의 문화적 터전을 이해하여 문화공동체적 특성을 계발하고 상호 관련성의 강화를 유도하는 학술활동을 통해 동북아시아의 문화발전에 이바지함.