Earticle

초록

영어

This paper aims to review the scope ambiguity in English and Logic, to investigate whether the scope ambiguity in logic is definitely ambiguous, whether English sentences as a natural language including both a universal quantifier and an existential quantifier is logically ambiguous, and whether English sentences are properly translated into logic forms, with reference to the sense relations of lexical words such as homonymy and polysemy, and the square of oppositions among the propositions with quantifier scope such as contraries, entails, contradictories and subcontraries. After reviewing the previous studies at first, in terms of syntactic approaches, semantic approaches and lexical approaches, we examined the sense relations of polysemy, homonymy, auto-hyponymy. and the square of proposition oppositions to review the definition of scope ambiguity in English and in logic. As a result, we found that the quantifier scopes in both English and logic are in the entails rather than ambiguous that a universal proposition A entails an existential proposition I, and English sentences do not correspond to Logic precisely.

목차

I. 서론
 II. 양화사 영향권과 관련된 문법 이론들
  1. 양화사 영향권의 번역과 논리적 의미
  2. 통사부에서 영향권 중의성을 분석한 이론
  3. 의미부에서 영향권 중의성을 분석한 이론
 III. 양화사의 영향권 중의성 검토
  1. 함의 관계와 진리치 불확실성 검토
  2. 의의 관계와 영향권 중의성 검토
  3. 양화명제 논리의 중의성 검토
 IV. 결론
 Works Cited
 Abstract

키워드

동음이의어 다의어 양화사 영향권 영향권 중의성 의의 관계 대립 사각도 homonymy polysemy quantifier scope scope ambiguity sense relations square of oppositions

저자

• 윤흥섭 [ Yoon, Heungseob | 충북대학교 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물