Earticle

초록

영어

Not until the late 1980s`, governments began to formulate evaluation scheme of national R&D programs. In this study, the comparative analysis of four nations` evaluation scheme for government-supported R&D programs was carried out in order to practically applicate to real R&D programs. This study aims at the procedure and assessment of the mode of project selection and its R&D agency. This study deals with national R&D programs such as G7 project (Korean), ATP & SBIR (American), Large scale project (Japanese), and ANVAR (French). Summing up, this paper suggested that mixing approach between Top-down and Button-up is adequate to select and develop future oriented R&D project, that the capability of R&D agency is more important than R&D project itself, and that practical utility is more required as an evaluation philosophy of the national R&D program.

목차

I. 序論
 II. 評價體系의 變遷
 III. 先導技術 開發事業의 評價體系
  1. 事業의 槪要
  2. 課題導出 節次및 方法
  3. 事業推進方式의 特徵
 IV. 美國의 R&D 몇 技術革新 支援專業(制度)의 評價體系
  1. 尖端技術 프로그램 (ATP ; Advanced Technology Program)
  2. 中小企業 革新硏究(SBIR ; Small Business Innovation Research)
 V. 日本의 大型 프로젝트(事業)
  1. 課題選定節次
  2. 事業推進方式의 特徵
 VI. 프랑스 國立工業化機關(ANVAR)의 技術革新 增進事業
  1. 課題選定節次
  2. 事業推進方式의 特徵
 VII. 結論
 參考文獻
 ABSTRACT

키워드

저자

• 李在河 [ 이재하 | 남서울대학교 경영학과 조교수 ]
• 朴商敏 [ 박상민 | 인천대학교 산업공학과 교수 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  생산성연구: 국제융합학술지 [Productivity Research: An International Interdisciplinary Journal]

• 간기

  격월간

• pISSN

  1225-3553

• 수록기간

  1987~2025

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 325 DDC 330