Earticle

초록

영어

The purpose of this study is to examine the realities around workplace innovations and to find policy goals needed to raise firms' productivity, throughout examining the distribution of work organizations in the Korean manufacturing firms. Based on the classification method in the previous studies, work organizations in manufacturing firms are classified as one of three types(and seven types in detail), non-systemic, Taylorist(Tayloristic, hybrid Tayloristic, and work organizations with a low functional flexibility) and high- performance work organization(Lean, hybrid Lean, and discretionary learning work organization). Two hundred manufacturing firms hiring 100 or more employees in 2009 are the samples of the survey done in 2009. The results show that the portion of firms with a non-systemic work organizations is 16.5% of the sample firms and the portion of firms with high-performance work organizations is 19% of the total firms, while 64.5% of the samples are firms with Taylorist work organizations. It means that almost 2/3 of the Korean manufacturing firms belong to Taylorist work organizations and the level of work organizations in the Korean firms should be developed to high-performance work organizations. The European data equivalent to the realities in Korea imply that the portion of firms with Taylorist work organizations in Europe 15 countries is only 13.6%. The results show that the Korean manufacturing firms should move from non-systemic or Taylorist work organizations to high-performance work organizations and policy regarding workplace innovations should support fully the transformations of work organizations.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
 Ⅱ. 설문 및 표본
 Ⅲ. 작업조직의 측정과 분류
 Ⅳ. 유럽 15개국 작업조직과의 비교
 Ⅴ. 결론
 참고문헌
 부록
 Abstract

키워드

저자

• 이정현 [ Jeong-Hyun Lee | 명지대학교 경영학과 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  생산성연구: 국제융합학술지 [Productivity Research: An International Interdisciplinary Journal]

• 간기

  격월간

• pISSN

  1225-3553

• 수록기간

  1987~2025

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 325 DDC 330