Earticle

초록

영어

Okutsu Keiichiro claims that the use of the passive sentence varied by the use of the passive sentence was affected by the writing style and passive sentences frequently appeared . This study evaluated whether passive sentences more frequently appeared in the literary style than in the conversational style, as previously claimed, by analyzing scripts. I classified the description and the conversation section in the script as the literary style and the conversational style, respectively. Afterward, the quantities of them were compared. The results of this study showed that a number of passive sentences in the conversation section were almost twice of that in the description. It was noteworthy that passive sentences consisted approximately 60% of conversation section. Although the script of scenarios tends to have more conversation section than description, the script used in this study had the roughly equal amount of conversation section and description. The results implied that the usage of passive sentences could be affected by another factor in addition to writing style. In other words, it would be possible that the usage of passive sentences is determined by the seriousness of the contents and writing style is a secondary factor. Moreover, many passive sentences in the description were used to describe situations, such as the verb of the Position, the verb of the Adhesion, the verb of Petting and the verb of the Pattern replacement. Contrarily, passive sentences were frequently used in conversational statements to express the actions and intention of people such as the verb of the Language activities, the verb of the Position, the verb of the Pattern replacement, the verb of the Attitude and the verb of the Intention. I also found that the frequency of passive sentences was approximately 3% of the description sentences and approximately 4% of the conversational sentences. These results were believed as the characteristics of passives sentences in the description and conversation section of scripts. However, further studies are needed to verify the findings.

일본어

奥津敬一郎（1984）は、受動文の使用に影響を与えるのは文体の違いであろうと主張している。そして文章体に受動文が多く現われるとも主張する。本稿では、果たして従来の主張通り受動文が会話体より文章体に多く現われるのかをシナリオという資料を利用して調べることを試みた。即ち、シナリオ上の地の文を文章体に、対話文を会話体として区別し、その具体的な量を比較してみた。その結果、対話文における受動文の量が地の文のほぼ倍に当たる数字を見せている。勿論、シナリオという性格上、対話体の量が地の文の量より多いという点(本稿で資料にしたシナリオではほぼその比率が半々だった）を勘案しても大体6対４の比率で対話体において受動文が多数出現したことは注目に値すると思われる。少なくとも受動文の出現は文体という変数と共に他の要素をも必要としているのではないかと思われる。例えば文の内容の軽重、即ち、その内容の重さによって受動文が選択されるのであって、文体は受動文出現のその一つの要素ではないかということである。実際、シナリオの内容が重いものであるほど受動文の出現が頻繁であることが分かった。それから、地の文においては位地動詞、付着動詞、ふれあい動詞、模様がえ動詞など、状況の描写に受動文が多く現われ、対話文においては、言語活動、位置、模様、態度、意志など、人間の活動と意志に関する表現に受動文が多く現われることが分かった。また、シナリオに於ては、受動文の頻度が地の文が全体の３％，対話文が４％ぐらい現われることも分かった。以上の結果は一応、シナリオに於ける地の文と対話文の受動文の特徴とも思われるが、今後、他の資料による深度のある研究が必要だと思われる。

목차

1. 서론
 2. 선행연구의 검토 및 결과
 3. 분석방법 및 내용
  3.1 분석방법
  3.2 분석내용
 4. 결론
 参考文献
 
 <要旨>

키워드

저자

• 金美燕 [ 김미연 | 한국외국어대학교 시간강사, 일본어학 ]

참고문헌

발행기관

간행물

표지보기 관심저널 등록

• 간행물명

  일본언어문화 [Journal of japanese Language and Culture]

• 간기

  계간

• pISSN

  1598-9585

• 수록기간

  2002~2025

• 등재여부

  KCI 등재

• 십진분류

  KDC 730 DDC 495